All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	marcandre.lureau@redhat.com,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 16:47:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181125004736.GA3065@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181124164229.89c670b6e7a3530ef7b0a40c@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> earlier versions?

Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway?  We have
tools/testing/selftests/vm/ already, perhaps they should go there?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: willy at infradead.org (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 16:47:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181125004736.GA3065@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181124164229.89c670b6e7a3530ef7b0a40c@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> earlier versions?

Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway?  We have
tools/testing/selftests/vm/ already, perhaps they should go there?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: willy@infradead.org (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 16:47:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181125004736.GA3065@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181125004736.uKqraRo4stqD5f9MzS9Q-rs41hhVTHKZj3vfWpVXIDk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181124164229.89c670b6e7a3530ef7b0a40c@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018@04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> earlier versions?

Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway?  We have
tools/testing/selftests/vm/ already, perhaps they should go there?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-25  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20  5:21 [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-20  5:21 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-20  5:21 ` joel
2018-11-20  5:21 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] selftests/memfd: modify tests for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-20  5:21   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-11-20  5:21   ` joel
2018-11-22 23:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-22 23:21     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-22 23:21     ` joel
2018-11-20 15:13 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] mm/memfd: make F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal more robust Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 15:13   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 15:13   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 15:13   ` luto
2018-11-20 18:39   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 18:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 18:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 18:39     ` joel
2018-11-20 20:07     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20 20:07       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20 20:07       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-20 20:07       ` sfr
2018-11-20 20:33       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 20:33         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 20:33         ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 20:33         ` luto
2018-11-20 20:47         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 20:47           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 20:47           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 20:47           ` joel
2018-11-20 21:02           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 21:02             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 21:02             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20 21:02             ` luto
2018-11-20 21:13             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 21:13               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 21:13               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 21:13               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 21:13               ` joel
2018-11-22  2:27               ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22  2:27                 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22  2:27                 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22  2:27                 ` akpm
2018-11-22  3:25                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22  3:25                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22  3:25                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22  3:25                   ` luto
2018-11-22 23:09                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-22 23:09                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-22 23:09                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-22 23:09                     ` joel
2018-11-25  0:42                     ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-25  0:42                       ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-25  0:42                       ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-25  0:42                       ` akpm
2018-11-25  0:47                       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-11-25  0:47                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-25  0:47                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-25  0:47                         ` willy
2018-11-26 13:35                         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-26 13:35                           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-26 13:35                           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-26 13:35                           ` joel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181125004736.GA3065@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.