All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: armada: fix broken temperature sensor in 4.19
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:54:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181125005453.GV30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1811241838180.7275@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The patch 8c0e64ac4075b7ca870098ed2ad6089868f5fa7b ("thermal: armada: get
> rid of the ->is_valid() pointer") breaks temperature readings on the
> MacchiatoBIN board. Reading the temperature with
> 	cat /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp
> results in errors:
> 
> armada_thermal f06f808c.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> armada_thermal f2400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> armada_thermal f4400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> 
> The patch was meant as simple refactoring, but unfortunatelly, it reverses
> the condition in armada_get_temp_legacy, so that the error is reported if
> armada_is_valid returns true.

I sent a patch for exactly this issue on 9th November... it doesn't
seem to have made it into mainline yet.

> 
> Fixes: 8c0e64ac4075 ("thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# 4.19
> 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-4.19.4/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-4.19.4.orig/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c	2018-11-25 00:19:20.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-4.19.4/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c	2018-11-25 00:39:49.000000000 +0100
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int armada_get_temp_legacy(struct
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Valid check */
> -	if (armada_is_valid(priv)) {
> +	if (!armada_is_valid(priv)) {
>  		dev_err(priv->dev,
>  			"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n");
>  		return -EIO;

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] thermal: armada: fix broken temperature sensor in 4.19
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:54:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181125005453.GV30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1811241838180.7275@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:45:00PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The patch 8c0e64ac4075b7ca870098ed2ad6089868f5fa7b ("thermal: armada: get
> rid of the ->is_valid() pointer") breaks temperature readings on the
> MacchiatoBIN board. Reading the temperature with
> 	cat /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp
> results in errors:
> 
> armada_thermal f06f808c.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> armada_thermal f2400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> armada_thermal f4400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
> 
> The patch was meant as simple refactoring, but unfortunatelly, it reverses
> the condition in armada_get_temp_legacy, so that the error is reported if
> armada_is_valid returns true.

I sent a patch for exactly this issue on 9th November... it doesn't
seem to have made it into mainline yet.

> 
> Fixes: 8c0e64ac4075 ("thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org	# 4.19
> 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-4.19.4/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-4.19.4.orig/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c	2018-11-25 00:19:20.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-4.19.4/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c	2018-11-25 00:39:49.000000000 +0100
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int armada_get_temp_legacy(struct
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Valid check */
> -	if (armada_is_valid(priv)) {
> +	if (!armada_is_valid(priv)) {
>  		dev_err(priv->dev,
>  			"Temperature sensor reading not valid\n");
>  		return -EIO;

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-25  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-24 23:45 [PATCH] thermal: armada: fix broken temperature sensor in 4.19 Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-24 23:45 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-24 23:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-24 23:53   ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-25  0:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-11-25  0:54   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-05  5:38   ` Eduardo Valentin
2018-12-05  5:38     ` Eduardo Valentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181125005453.GV30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.