All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
@ 2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-24 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel

In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
the same.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 01ec04bf91b5..ca4e61c864d5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
 
 static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
 
+static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
+
 static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
 	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
 	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
 
+	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
+				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
 	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
 }
@@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
+	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
 		goto err;
 	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 	return nfit_res->buf;
  err:
+	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
 	if (buf)
 		vfree(buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
@@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
 {
+	struct genpool_data_align data = {
+		.align = SZ_128M,
+	};
 	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
 
-	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
+	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
+				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
+	else
+		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
 	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
 }
 
@@ -2839,6 +2854,18 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 		goto err_register;
 	}
 
+	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!nfit_pool) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
+	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, VMALLOC_START,
+				VMALLOC_END + 1 - VMALLOC_START, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
 		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
 		struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -2894,6 +2921,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 	return 0;
 
  err_register:
+	if (nfit_pool)
+		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		if (instances[i])
@@ -2917,6 +2947,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
 	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
 	nfit_test_teardown();
 
+	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
 	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
@ 2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-24 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel, vishal.l.verma, dave.jiang

In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
the same.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 01ec04bf91b5..ca4e61c864d5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
 
 static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
 
+static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
+
 static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
 	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
 	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
 
+	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
+				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
 	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
 }
@@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
+	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
 		goto err;
 	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 	return nfit_res->buf;
  err:
+	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
 	if (buf)
 		vfree(buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
@@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
 {
+	struct genpool_data_align data = {
+		.align = SZ_128M,
+	};
 	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
 
-	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
+	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
+				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
+	else
+		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
 	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
 }
 
@@ -2839,6 +2854,18 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 		goto err_register;
 	}
 
+	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!nfit_pool) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
+	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, VMALLOC_START,
+				VMALLOC_END + 1 - VMALLOC_START, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
 		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
 		struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -2894,6 +2921,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 	return 0;
 
  err_register:
+	if (nfit_pool)
+		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		if (instances[i])
@@ -2917,6 +2947,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
 	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
 	nfit_test_teardown();
 
+	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
 	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
  2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
@ 2018-11-24 18:47   ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-24 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable

Commit cfe30b872058 "libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with
'System RAM'" enabled Linux to workaround occasions where platform
firmware arranges for "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory" to collide
within a single section boundary. Unfortunately, as reported in this
issue [1], platform firmware can inflict the same collision between
persistent memory regions.

The approach of interrogating iomem_resource does not work in this
case because platform firmware may merge multiple regions into a single
iomem_resource range. Instead provide a method to interrogate regions
that share the same parent bus.

This is a stop-gap until the core-MM can grow support for hotplug on
sub-section boundaries.

[1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/76

Fixes: cfe30b872058 ("libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with...")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h     |    2 +
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c    |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
index 182258f64417..d0c621b32f72 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ resource_size_t nd_pmem_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region,
 		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, resource_size_t *overlap);
 resource_size_t nd_blk_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
 resource_size_t nd_region_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
+int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
+		resource_size_t size);
 resource_size_t nvdimm_allocated_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
 		struct nd_label_id *label_id);
 int alias_dpa_busy(struct device *dev, void *data);
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
index 24c64090169e..6f22272e8d80 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
@@ -649,14 +649,47 @@ static u64 phys_pmem_align_down(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u64 phys)
 			ALIGN_DOWN(phys, nd_pfn->align));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM', or other regions when
+ * section aligned.  Trim it accordingly.
+ */
+static void trim_pfn_device(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u32 *start_pad, u32 *end_trunc)
+{
+	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
+	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
+	struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(nd_pfn->dev.parent);
+	const resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
+	const resource_size_t end = start + resource_size(&nsio->res);
+	resource_size_t adjust, size;
+
+	*start_pad = 0;
+	*end_trunc = 0;
+
+	adjust = start - PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(start);
+	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
+	if (region_intersects(start - adjust, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
+			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start - adjust, size))
+		*start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
+
+	/* Now check that end of the range does not collide. */
+	adjust = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(end) - end;
+	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
+	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
+			|| !IS_ALIGNED(end, nd_pfn->align)
+			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start, size + adjust))
+		*end_trunc = end - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn, end);
+}
+
 static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 {
 	u32 dax_label_reserve = is_nd_dax(&nd_pfn->dev) ? SZ_128K : 0;
 	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
-	u32 start_pad = 0, end_trunc = 0;
+	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
 	resource_size_t start, size;
-	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
 	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	u32 start_pad, end_trunc;
 	struct nd_pfn_sb *pfn_sb;
 	unsigned long npfns;
 	phys_addr_t offset;
@@ -688,30 +721,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 
 	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
 
-	/*
-	 * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM' when section aligned and
-	 * trim it accordingly
-	 */
-	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
-	start = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(nsio->res.start);
-	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
-		start = nsio->res.start;
-		start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
-	}
-
-	start = nsio->res.start;
-	size = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start + size) - start;
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
-			|| !IS_ALIGNED(start + resource_size(&nsio->res),
-				nd_pfn->align)) {
-		size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-		end_trunc = start + size - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn,
-				start + size);
-	}
-
+	trim_pfn_device(nd_pfn, &start_pad, &end_trunc);
 	if (start_pad + end_trunc)
 		dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s alignment collision, truncate %d bytes\n",
 				dev_name(&ndns->dev), start_pad + end_trunc);
@@ -722,7 +732,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 	 * implementation will limit the pfns advertised through
 	 * ->direct_access() to those that are included in the memmap.
 	 */
-	start += start_pad;
+	start = nsio->res.start + start_pad;
 	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
 	npfns = PFN_SECTION_ALIGN_UP((size - start_pad - end_trunc - SZ_8K)
 			/ PAGE_SIZE);
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
index 174a418cb171..e7377f1028ef 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,47 @@ int nvdimm_has_cache(struct nd_region *nd_region)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvdimm_has_cache);
 
+struct conflict_context {
+	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	resource_size_t start, size;
+};
+
+static int region_conflict(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	struct conflict_context *ctx = data;
+	resource_size_t res_end, region_end, region_start;
+
+	if (!is_memory(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	nd_region = to_nd_region(dev);
+	if (nd_region == ctx->nd_region)
+		return 0;
+
+	res_end = ctx->start + ctx->size;
+	region_start = nd_region->ndr_start;
+	region_end = region_start + nd_region->ndr_size;
+	if (ctx->start >= region_start && ctx->start < region_end)
+		return -EBUSY;
+	if (res_end > region_start && res_end <= region_end)
+		return -EBUSY;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
+		resource_size_t size)
+{
+	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = walk_to_nvdimm_bus(&nd_region->dev);
+	struct conflict_context ctx = {
+		.nd_region = nd_region,
+		.start = start,
+		.size = size,
+	};
+
+	return device_for_each_child(&nvdimm_bus->dev, &ctx, region_conflict);
+}
+
 void __exit nd_region_devs_exit(void)
 {
 	ida_destroy(&region_ida);

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
@ 2018-11-24 18:47   ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-24 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: stable, linux-kernel, vishal.l.verma, dave.jiang

Commit cfe30b872058 "libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with
'System RAM'" enabled Linux to workaround occasions where platform
firmware arranges for "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory" to collide
within a single section boundary. Unfortunately, as reported in this
issue [1], platform firmware can inflict the same collision between
persistent memory regions.

The approach of interrogating iomem_resource does not work in this
case because platform firmware may merge multiple regions into a single
iomem_resource range. Instead provide a method to interrogate regions
that share the same parent bus.

This is a stop-gap until the core-MM can grow support for hotplug on
sub-section boundaries.

[1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/76

Fixes: cfe30b872058 ("libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with...")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h     |    2 +
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c    |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
index 182258f64417..d0c621b32f72 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ resource_size_t nd_pmem_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region,
 		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, resource_size_t *overlap);
 resource_size_t nd_blk_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
 resource_size_t nd_region_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
+int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
+		resource_size_t size);
 resource_size_t nvdimm_allocated_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
 		struct nd_label_id *label_id);
 int alias_dpa_busy(struct device *dev, void *data);
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
index 24c64090169e..6f22272e8d80 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
@@ -649,14 +649,47 @@ static u64 phys_pmem_align_down(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u64 phys)
 			ALIGN_DOWN(phys, nd_pfn->align));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM', or other regions when
+ * section aligned.  Trim it accordingly.
+ */
+static void trim_pfn_device(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u32 *start_pad, u32 *end_trunc)
+{
+	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
+	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
+	struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(nd_pfn->dev.parent);
+	const resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
+	const resource_size_t end = start + resource_size(&nsio->res);
+	resource_size_t adjust, size;
+
+	*start_pad = 0;
+	*end_trunc = 0;
+
+	adjust = start - PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(start);
+	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
+	if (region_intersects(start - adjust, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
+			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start - adjust, size))
+		*start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
+
+	/* Now check that end of the range does not collide. */
+	adjust = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(end) - end;
+	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
+	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
+			|| !IS_ALIGNED(end, nd_pfn->align)
+			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start, size + adjust))
+		*end_trunc = end - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn, end);
+}
+
 static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 {
 	u32 dax_label_reserve = is_nd_dax(&nd_pfn->dev) ? SZ_128K : 0;
 	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
-	u32 start_pad = 0, end_trunc = 0;
+	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
 	resource_size_t start, size;
-	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
 	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	u32 start_pad, end_trunc;
 	struct nd_pfn_sb *pfn_sb;
 	unsigned long npfns;
 	phys_addr_t offset;
@@ -688,30 +721,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 
 	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
 
-	/*
-	 * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM' when section aligned and
-	 * trim it accordingly
-	 */
-	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
-	start = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(nsio->res.start);
-	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
-		start = nsio->res.start;
-		start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
-	}
-
-	start = nsio->res.start;
-	size = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start + size) - start;
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
-			|| !IS_ALIGNED(start + resource_size(&nsio->res),
-				nd_pfn->align)) {
-		size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-		end_trunc = start + size - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn,
-				start + size);
-	}
-
+	trim_pfn_device(nd_pfn, &start_pad, &end_trunc);
 	if (start_pad + end_trunc)
 		dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s alignment collision, truncate %d bytes\n",
 				dev_name(&ndns->dev), start_pad + end_trunc);
@@ -722,7 +732,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 	 * implementation will limit the pfns advertised through
 	 * ->direct_access() to those that are included in the memmap.
 	 */
-	start += start_pad;
+	start = nsio->res.start + start_pad;
 	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
 	npfns = PFN_SECTION_ALIGN_UP((size - start_pad - end_trunc - SZ_8K)
 			/ PAGE_SIZE);
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
index 174a418cb171..e7377f1028ef 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,47 @@ int nvdimm_has_cache(struct nd_region *nd_region)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvdimm_has_cache);
 
+struct conflict_context {
+	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	resource_size_t start, size;
+};
+
+static int region_conflict(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct nd_region *nd_region;
+	struct conflict_context *ctx = data;
+	resource_size_t res_end, region_end, region_start;
+
+	if (!is_memory(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	nd_region = to_nd_region(dev);
+	if (nd_region == ctx->nd_region)
+		return 0;
+
+	res_end = ctx->start + ctx->size;
+	region_start = nd_region->ndr_start;
+	region_end = region_start + nd_region->ndr_size;
+	if (ctx->start >= region_start && ctx->start < region_end)
+		return -EBUSY;
+	if (res_end > region_start && res_end <= region_end)
+		return -EBUSY;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
+		resource_size_t size)
+{
+	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = walk_to_nvdimm_bus(&nd_region->dev);
+	struct conflict_context ctx = {
+		.nd_region = nd_region,
+		.start = start,
+		.size = size,
+	};
+
+	return device_for_each_child(&nvdimm_bus->dev, &ctx, region_conflict);
+}
+
 void __exit nd_region_devs_exit(void)
 {
 	ida_destroy(&region_ida);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
  2018-11-24 18:47   ` Dan Williams
@ 2018-11-25  7:54       ` Sasha Levin
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-11-25  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw
  Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: cfe30b872058 libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with 'System RAM'.

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.4, v4.14.83, v4.9.140.

v4.19.4: Build OK!
v4.14.83: Build OK!
v4.9.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    Unable to calculate


How should we proceed with this patch?

--
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
@ 2018-11-25  7:54       ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-11-25  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm
  Cc: stable, linux-kernel, , stable, stable

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: cfe30b872058 libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with 'System RAM'.

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.4, v4.14.83, v4.9.140.

v4.19.4: Build OK!
v4.14.83: Build OK!
v4.9.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    Unable to calculate


How should we proceed with this patch?

--
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
  2018-11-25  7:54       ` Sasha Levin
@ 2018-11-25 16:37         ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-25 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sashal; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, stable, linux-nvdimm

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:54 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: cfe30b872058 libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with 'System RAM'.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.4, v4.14.83, v4.9.140.
>
> v4.19.4: Build OK!
> v4.14.83: Build OK!
> v4.9.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     Unable to calculate
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?

4.9-stable will need a manual backport since this code was refactored
in the intervening kernel releases.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
@ 2018-11-25 16:37         ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-11-25 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sashal; +Cc: linux-nvdimm, stable, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:54 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: cfe30b872058 libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with 'System RAM'.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.4, v4.14.83, v4.9.140.
>
> v4.19.4: Build OK!
> v4.14.83: Build OK!
> v4.9.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     Unable to calculate
>
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?

4.9-stable will need a manual backport since this code was refactored
in the intervening kernel releases.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
  2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
@ 2018-12-03 18:33   ` Verma, Vishal L
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Vishal L @ 2018-12-03 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Williams, Dan J, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel


On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 10:46 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
> conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
> allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
> resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
> the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

This looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> index 01ec04bf91b5..ca4e61c864d5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
>  
>  static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
>  
> +static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
> +
>  static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> @@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
>  	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
>  	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
>  
> +	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
> +				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
>  	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
>  	kfree(nfit_res);
>  }
> @@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
> +	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
>  		goto err;
>  	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
>  	if (rc)
> @@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  
>  	return nfit_res->buf;
>   err:
> +	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
>  	if (buf)
>  		vfree(buf);
>  	kfree(nfit_res);
> @@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  
>  static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
>  {
> +	struct genpool_data_align data = {
> +		.align = SZ_128M,
> +	};
>  	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
>  
> -	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
> +	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
> +				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
> +	else
> +		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
>  	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2839,6 +2854,18 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
>  		goto err_register;
>  	}
>  
> +	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +	if (!nfit_pool) {
> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, VMALLOC_START,
> +				VMALLOC_END + 1 - VMALLOC_START, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_register;
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
>  		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
>  		struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -2894,6 +2921,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  
>   err_register:
> +	if (nfit_pool)
> +		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
> +
>  	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
>  		if (instances[i])
> @@ -2917,6 +2947,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
>  	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
>  	nfit_test_teardown();
>  
> +	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
>  		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
>  	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
@ 2018-12-03 18:33   ` Verma, Vishal L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Vishal L @ 2018-12-03 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Williams, Dan J, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jiang, Dave


On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 10:46 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
> conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
> allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
> resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
> the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

This looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> index 01ec04bf91b5..ca4e61c864d5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
>  
>  static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
>  
> +static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
> +
>  static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> @@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
>  	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
>  	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
>  
> +	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
> +				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
>  	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
>  	kfree(nfit_res);
>  }
> @@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  			GFP_KERNEL);
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
> +	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
>  		goto err;
>  	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
>  	if (rc)
> @@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  
>  	return nfit_res->buf;
>   err:
> +	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
>  	if (buf)
>  		vfree(buf);
>  	kfree(nfit_res);
> @@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
>  
>  static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
>  {
> +	struct genpool_data_align data = {
> +		.align = SZ_128M,
> +	};
>  	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
>  
> -	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
> +	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
> +		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
> +				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
> +	else
> +		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
>  	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2839,6 +2854,18 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
>  		goto err_register;
>  	}
>  
> +	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +	if (!nfit_pool) {
> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, VMALLOC_START,
> +				VMALLOC_END + 1 - VMALLOC_START, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_register;
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
>  		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
>  		struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -2894,6 +2921,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
>  	return 0;
>  
>   err_register:
> +	if (nfit_pool)
> +		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
> +
>  	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
>  		if (instances[i])
> @@ -2917,6 +2947,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
>  	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
>  	nfit_test_teardown();
>  
> +	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
>  		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
>  	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
  2018-11-24 18:47   ` Dan Williams
@ 2018-12-03 18:37     ` Verma, Vishal L
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Vishal L @ 2018-12-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Williams, Dan J, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable


On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 10:47 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Commit cfe30b872058 "libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with
> 'System RAM'" enabled Linux to workaround occasions where platform
> firmware arranges for "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory" to collide
> within a single section boundary. Unfortunately, as reported in this
> issue [1], platform firmware can inflict the same collision between
> persistent memory regions.
> 
> The approach of interrogating iomem_resource does not work in this
> case because platform firmware may merge multiple regions into a single
> iomem_resource range. Instead provide a method to interrogate regions
> that share the same parent bus.
> 
> This is a stop-gap until the core-MM can grow support for hotplug on
> sub-section boundaries.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/76
> 
> Fixes: cfe30b872058 ("libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with...")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h     |    2 +
>  drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c    |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> index 182258f64417..d0c621b32f72 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ resource_size_t nd_pmem_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>  		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, resource_size_t *overlap);
>  resource_size_t nd_blk_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  resource_size_t nd_region_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
> +int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
> +		resource_size_t size);
>  resource_size_t nvdimm_allocated_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  		struct nd_label_id *label_id);
>  int alias_dpa_busy(struct device *dev, void *data);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> index 24c64090169e..6f22272e8d80 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> @@ -649,14 +649,47 @@ static u64 phys_pmem_align_down(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u64 phys)
>  			ALIGN_DOWN(phys, nd_pfn->align));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM', or other regions when
> + * section aligned.  Trim it accordingly.
> + */
> +static void trim_pfn_device(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u32 *start_pad, u32 *end_trunc)
> +{
> +	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
> +	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(nd_pfn->dev.parent);
> +	const resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
> +	const resource_size_t end = start + resource_size(&nsio->res);
> +	resource_size_t adjust, size;
> +
> +	*start_pad = 0;
> +	*end_trunc = 0;
> +
> +	adjust = start - PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(start);
> +	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
> +	if (region_intersects(start - adjust, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> +				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> +			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start - adjust, size))
> +		*start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
> +
> +	/* Now check that end of the range does not collide. */
> +	adjust = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(end) - end;
> +	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
> +	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> +				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> +			|| !IS_ALIGNED(end, nd_pfn->align)
> +			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start, size + adjust))
> +		*end_trunc = end - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn, end);
> +}
> +
>  static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  {
>  	u32 dax_label_reserve = is_nd_dax(&nd_pfn->dev) ? SZ_128K : 0;
>  	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
> -	u32 start_pad = 0, end_trunc = 0;
> +	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
>  	resource_size_t start, size;
> -	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
>  	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	u32 start_pad, end_trunc;
>  	struct nd_pfn_sb *pfn_sb;
>  	unsigned long npfns;
>  	phys_addr_t offset;
> @@ -688,30 +721,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  
>  	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM' when section aligned and
> -	 * trim it accordingly
> -	 */
> -	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> -	start = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(nsio->res.start);
> -	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
> -	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> -				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
> -		start = nsio->res.start;
> -		start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
> -	}
> -
> -	start = nsio->res.start;
> -	size = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start + size) - start;
> -	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> -				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> -			|| !IS_ALIGNED(start + resource_size(&nsio->res),
> -				nd_pfn->align)) {
> -		size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
> -		end_trunc = start + size - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn,
> -				start + size);
> -	}
> -
> +	trim_pfn_device(nd_pfn, &start_pad, &end_trunc);
>  	if (start_pad + end_trunc)
>  		dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s alignment collision, truncate %d bytes\n",
>  				dev_name(&ndns->dev), start_pad + end_trunc);
> @@ -722,7 +732,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  	 * implementation will limit the pfns advertised through
>  	 * ->direct_access() to those that are included in the memmap.
>  	 */
> -	start += start_pad;
> +	start = nsio->res.start + start_pad;
>  	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
>  	npfns = PFN_SECTION_ALIGN_UP((size - start_pad - end_trunc - SZ_8K)
>  			/ PAGE_SIZE);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> index 174a418cb171..e7377f1028ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> @@ -1184,6 +1184,47 @@ int nvdimm_has_cache(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvdimm_has_cache);
>  
> +struct conflict_context {
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	resource_size_t start, size;
> +};
> +
> +static int region_conflict(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	struct conflict_context *ctx = data;
> +	resource_size_t res_end, region_end, region_start;
> +
> +	if (!is_memory(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	nd_region = to_nd_region(dev);
> +	if (nd_region == ctx->nd_region)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	res_end = ctx->start + ctx->size;
> +	region_start = nd_region->ndr_start;
> +	region_end = region_start + nd_region->ndr_size;
> +	if (ctx->start >= region_start && ctx->start < region_end)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	if (res_end > region_start && res_end <= region_end)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
> +		resource_size_t size)
> +{
> +	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = walk_to_nvdimm_bus(&nd_region->dev);
> +	struct conflict_context ctx = {
> +		.nd_region = nd_region,
> +		.start = start,
> +		.size = size,
> +	};
> +
> +	return device_for_each_child(&nvdimm_bus->dev, &ctx, region_conflict);
> +}
> +
>  void __exit nd_region_devs_exit(void)
>  {
>  	ida_destroy(&region_ida);
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions
@ 2018-12-03 18:37     ` Verma, Vishal L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Verma, Vishal L @ 2018-12-03 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Williams, Dan J, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jiang, Dave, stable


On Sat, 2018-11-24 at 10:47 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Commit cfe30b872058 "libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with
> 'System RAM'" enabled Linux to workaround occasions where platform
> firmware arranges for "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory" to collide
> within a single section boundary. Unfortunately, as reported in this
> issue [1], platform firmware can inflict the same collision between
> persistent memory regions.
> 
> The approach of interrogating iomem_resource does not work in this
> case because platform firmware may merge multiple regions into a single
> iomem_resource range. Instead provide a method to interrogate regions
> that share the same parent bus.
> 
> This is a stop-gap until the core-MM can grow support for hotplug on
> sub-section boundaries.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/issues/76
> 
> Fixes: cfe30b872058 ("libnvdimm, pmem: adjust for section collisions with...")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h     |    2 +
>  drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c    |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> index 182258f64417..d0c621b32f72 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ resource_size_t nd_pmem_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>  		struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, resource_size_t *overlap);
>  resource_size_t nd_blk_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
>  resource_size_t nd_region_available_dpa(struct nd_region *nd_region);
> +int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
> +		resource_size_t size);
>  resource_size_t nvdimm_allocated_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  		struct nd_label_id *label_id);
>  int alias_dpa_busy(struct device *dev, void *data);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> index 24c64090169e..6f22272e8d80 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> @@ -649,14 +649,47 @@ static u64 phys_pmem_align_down(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u64 phys)
>  			ALIGN_DOWN(phys, nd_pfn->align));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM', or other regions when
> + * section aligned.  Trim it accordingly.
> + */
> +static void trim_pfn_device(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, u32 *start_pad, u32 *end_trunc)
> +{
> +	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
> +	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region = to_nd_region(nd_pfn->dev.parent);
> +	const resource_size_t start = nsio->res.start;
> +	const resource_size_t end = start + resource_size(&nsio->res);
> +	resource_size_t adjust, size;
> +
> +	*start_pad = 0;
> +	*end_trunc = 0;
> +
> +	adjust = start - PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(start);
> +	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
> +	if (region_intersects(start - adjust, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> +				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> +			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start - adjust, size))
> +		*start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
> +
> +	/* Now check that end of the range does not collide. */
> +	adjust = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(end) - end;
> +	size = resource_size(&nsio->res) + adjust;
> +	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> +				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> +			|| !IS_ALIGNED(end, nd_pfn->align)
> +			|| nd_region_conflict(nd_region, start, size + adjust))
> +		*end_trunc = end - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn, end);
> +}
> +
>  static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  {
>  	u32 dax_label_reserve = is_nd_dax(&nd_pfn->dev) ? SZ_128K : 0;
>  	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
> -	u32 start_pad = 0, end_trunc = 0;
> +	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
>  	resource_size_t start, size;
> -	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
>  	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	u32 start_pad, end_trunc;
>  	struct nd_pfn_sb *pfn_sb;
>  	unsigned long npfns;
>  	phys_addr_t offset;
> @@ -688,30 +721,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  
>  	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM' when section aligned and
> -	 * trim it accordingly
> -	 */
> -	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> -	start = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(nsio->res.start);
> -	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
> -	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> -				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
> -		start = nsio->res.start;
> -		start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
> -	}
> -
> -	start = nsio->res.start;
> -	size = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start + size) - start;
> -	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
> -				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED
> -			|| !IS_ALIGNED(start + resource_size(&nsio->res),
> -				nd_pfn->align)) {
> -		size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
> -		end_trunc = start + size - phys_pmem_align_down(nd_pfn,
> -				start + size);
> -	}
> -
> +	trim_pfn_device(nd_pfn, &start_pad, &end_trunc);
>  	if (start_pad + end_trunc)
>  		dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s alignment collision, truncate %d bytes\n",
>  				dev_name(&ndns->dev), start_pad + end_trunc);
> @@ -722,7 +732,7 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
>  	 * implementation will limit the pfns advertised through
>  	 * ->direct_access() to those that are included in the memmap.
>  	 */
> -	start += start_pad;
> +	start = nsio->res.start + start_pad;
>  	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
>  	npfns = PFN_SECTION_ALIGN_UP((size - start_pad - end_trunc - SZ_8K)
>  			/ PAGE_SIZE);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> index 174a418cb171..e7377f1028ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/region_devs.c
> @@ -1184,6 +1184,47 @@ int nvdimm_has_cache(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvdimm_has_cache);
>  
> +struct conflict_context {
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	resource_size_t start, size;
> +};
> +
> +static int region_conflict(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +	struct conflict_context *ctx = data;
> +	resource_size_t res_end, region_end, region_start;
> +
> +	if (!is_memory(dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	nd_region = to_nd_region(dev);
> +	if (nd_region == ctx->nd_region)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	res_end = ctx->start + ctx->size;
> +	region_start = nd_region->ndr_start;
> +	region_end = region_start + nd_region->ndr_size;
> +	if (ctx->start >= region_start && ctx->start < region_end)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	if (res_end > region_start && res_end <= region_end)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int nd_region_conflict(struct nd_region *nd_region, resource_size_t start,
> +		resource_size_t size)
> +{
> +	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = walk_to_nvdimm_bus(&nd_region->dev);
> +	struct conflict_context ctx = {
> +		.nd_region = nd_region,
> +		.start = start,
> +		.size = size,
> +	};
> +
> +	return device_for_each_child(&nvdimm_bus->dev, &ctx, region_conflict);
> +}
> +
>  void __exit nd_region_devs_exit(void)
>  {
>  	ida_destroy(&region_ida);
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
  2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
@ 2018-12-05 22:15   ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-12-05 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-kernel

In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
the same.

Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Fix intermittent crash from stale vmalloc() alias usage (Vishal)

 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 01ec04bf91b5..6c16ac36d482 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
 
 static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
 
+static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
+
 static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
 	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
 	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
 
+	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
+				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
 	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
 }
@@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
+	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
 		goto err;
 	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 	return nfit_res->buf;
  err:
+	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
 	if (buf)
 		vfree(buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
@@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
 {
+	struct genpool_data_align data = {
+		.align = SZ_128M,
+	};
 	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
 
-	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
+	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
+				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
+	else
+		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
 	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
 }
 
@@ -2839,6 +2854,17 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 		goto err_register;
 	}
 
+	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!nfit_pool) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
+	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, SZ_4G, SZ_4G, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
 		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
 		struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -2894,6 +2920,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 	return 0;
 
  err_register:
+	if (nfit_pool)
+		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		if (instances[i])
@@ -2917,6 +2946,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
 	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
 	nfit_test_teardown();
 
+	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
 	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M
@ 2018-12-05 22:15   ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2018-12-05 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: Vishal Verma, Vishal Verma, linux-kernel

In preparation for libnvdimm growing new restrictions to detect section
conflicts between persistent memory regions, enable nfit_test to
allocate aligned resources. Use a gen_pool to allocate nfit_test's fake
resources in a separate address space from the virtual translation of
the same.

Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Fix intermittent crash from stale vmalloc() alias usage (Vishal)

 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 01ec04bf91b5..6c16ac36d482 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
+#include <linux/genalloc.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ struct nfit_test {
 
 static struct workqueue_struct *nfit_wq;
 
+static struct gen_pool *nfit_pool;
+
 static struct nfit_test *to_nfit_test(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -1132,6 +1135,9 @@ static void release_nfit_res(void *data)
 	list_del(&nfit_res->list);
 	spin_unlock(&nfit_test_lock);
 
+	if (resource_size(&nfit_res->res) >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, nfit_res->res.start,
+				resource_size(&nfit_res->res));
 	vfree(nfit_res->buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
 }
@@ -1144,7 +1150,7 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!buf || !nfit_res)
+	if (!buf || !nfit_res || !*dma)
 		goto err;
 	rc = devm_add_action(dev, release_nfit_res, nfit_res);
 	if (rc)
@@ -1164,6 +1170,8 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 	return nfit_res->buf;
  err:
+	if (*dma && size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		gen_pool_free(nfit_pool, *dma, size);
 	if (buf)
 		vfree(buf);
 	kfree(nfit_res);
@@ -1172,9 +1180,16 @@ static void *__test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma,
 
 static void *test_alloc(struct nfit_test *t, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma)
 {
+	struct genpool_data_align data = {
+		.align = SZ_128M,
+	};
 	void *buf = vmalloc(size);
 
-	*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
+	if (size >= DIMM_SIZE)
+		*dma = gen_pool_alloc_algo(nfit_pool, size,
+				gen_pool_first_fit_align, &data);
+	else
+		*dma = (unsigned long) buf;
 	return __test_alloc(t, size, dma, buf);
 }
 
@@ -2839,6 +2854,17 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 		goto err_register;
 	}
 
+	nfit_pool = gen_pool_create(ilog2(SZ_4M), NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!nfit_pool) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
+	if (gen_pool_add(nfit_pool, SZ_4G, SZ_4G, NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_register;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++) {
 		struct nfit_test *nfit_test;
 		struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -2894,6 +2920,9 @@ static __init int nfit_test_init(void)
 	return 0;
 
  err_register:
+	if (nfit_pool)
+		gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	destroy_workqueue(nfit_wq);
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		if (instances[i])
@@ -2917,6 +2946,8 @@ static __exit void nfit_test_exit(void)
 	platform_driver_unregister(&nfit_test_driver);
 	nfit_test_teardown();
 
+	gen_pool_destroy(nfit_pool);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_NFITS; i++)
 		put_device(&instances[i]->pdev.dev);
 	class_destroy(nfit_test_dimm);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-05 22:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-24 18:46 [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M Dan Williams
2018-11-24 18:46 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-24 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] libnvdimm, pfn: Pad pfn namespaces relative to other regions Dan Williams
2018-11-24 18:47   ` Dan Williams
     [not found]   ` <154308522458.237140.16550557898744466932.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-25  7:54     ` Sasha Levin
2018-11-25  7:54       ` Sasha Levin
2018-11-25 16:37       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-25 16:37         ` Dan Williams
2018-12-03 18:37   ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-12-03 18:37     ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-12-03 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/testing/nvdimm: Align test resources to 128M Verma, Vishal L
2018-12-03 18:33   ` Verma, Vishal L
2018-12-05 22:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Williams
2018-12-05 22:15   ` Dan Williams

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.