All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v7] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT
@ 2018-11-27 20:51 Manasi Navare
  2018-11-27 21:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT (rev2) Patchwork
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2018-11-27 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

From: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>

According to DP spec (2.9.3.1 of DP 1.4) if
EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT is set the addresses in DPCD
02200h through 0220Fh shall contain the DPRX's true capability. These
values will match 00000h through 0000Fh, except for DPCD_REV,
MAX_LINK_RATE, DOWN_STREAM_PORT_PRESENT.

Read from DPCD once for all 3 values as this is an expensive operation.
Spec mentions that all of address space 02200h through 0220Fh should
contain the right information however currently only 3 values can
differ.

There is no address space in the intel_dp->dpcd struct for addresses
02200h through 0220Fh, and since so much of the data is a identical,
simply overwrite the values stored in 00000h through 0000Fh with the
values that can be overwritten from addresses 02200h through 0220Fh.

This patch helps with backward compatibility for devices pre DP1.3.

v2: read only dpcd values which can be affected, remove incorrect check,
split into drm include changes into separate patch, commit message,
verbose debugging statements during overwrite.
v3: white space fixes
v4: make path dependent on DPCD revision > 1.2
v5: split into function, removed DPCD rev check
v6: add debugging prints for early exit conditions
v7 (From Manasi):
* Memcpy, memcmp and debig logging based on sizeof(dpcd_ext) (Jani N)
* Exit early (Jani N)

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Acked-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 70ae3d57316b..a9eb14a4ab27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3802,6 +3802,45 @@ intel_dp_link_down(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	}
 }
 
+static void
+intel_dp_extended_receiver_capabilities(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+	u8 dpcd_ext[6];
+
+	/*
+	 * Prior to DP1.3 the bit represented by
+	 * DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT was reserved.
+	 * if it is set DP_DPCD_REV at 0000h could be at a value less than
+	 * the true capability of the panel. The only way to check is to
+	 * then compare 0000h and 2200h.
+	 */
+	if (!(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] &
+	      DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT))
+		return;
+
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: Reading extended receiver capabilities\n");
+
+	if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_DP13_DPCD_REV,
+			     &dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext)) != sizeof(dpcd_ext)) {
+		DRM_ERROR("DPCD failed read at extended capabilities\n");
+		return;
+	}
+	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] > dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV]) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD extended DPCD rev less than base DPCD rev\n");
+		return;
+	}
+	if (!memcmp(intel_dp->dpcd, dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext))) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Extended Receiver Cap DPCD match the base DPCD\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Base DPCD: %*ph\n", (int)sizeof(dpcd_ext), intel_dp->dpcd);
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Extended Receiver Cap DPCD: %*ph\n",
+		      (int)sizeof(dpcd_ext), dpcd_ext);
+	memcpy(intel_dp->dpcd, dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext));
+}
+
+
 bool
 intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 {
@@ -3809,6 +3848,8 @@ intel_dp_read_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 			     sizeof(intel_dp->dpcd)) < 0)
 		return false; /* aux transfer failed */
 
+	intel_dp_extended_receiver_capabilities(intel_dp);
+
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DPCD: %*ph\n", (int) sizeof(intel_dp->dpcd), intel_dp->dpcd);
 
 	return intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] != 0;
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-06 15:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-27 20:51 [PATCH v7] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT Manasi Navare
2018-11-27 21:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-27 22:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-28  9:09 ` [PATCH v7] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT Jani Nikula
2018-11-28 19:18   ` Manasi Navare
2018-11-28 10:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-29 18:34 ` [PATCH v8] drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT Manasi Navare
2018-11-29 19:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-29 19:43     ` Manasi Navare
2018-11-29 20:04       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-11-29 22:00   ` [PATCH v9] " Manasi Navare
2018-11-29 22:54     ` Atwood, Matthew S
2018-11-29 23:37       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-12-03 23:54         ` Atwood, Matthew S
2018-12-06 15:50     ` Manasi Navare
2018-11-29 19:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT (rev3) Patchwork
2018-11-29 23:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: implement EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAPABILITY_FIELD_PRESENT (rev4) Patchwork
2018-11-30 17:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.