All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs
Date: Tue,  4 Dec 2018 15:00:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204230032.6352-2-jose.souza@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204230032.6352-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

The old debugfs fields was not following a naming partern and it was
a bit confusing.

So it went from:
~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
Sink_Support: yes
PSR mode: PSR1
Enabled: yes
Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x000
Main link in standby mode: no
HW Enabled & Active bit: yes
Source PSR status: 0x24050006 [SRDONACK]

To:
~$ sudo more /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
Sink support: yes [0x00000003]
Status: PSR1 enabled
Source PSR ctl: enabled [0x81f00e26]
Source PSR status: SRDENT [0x40040006]
Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x00000000

The 'Main link in standby mode' was removed as it is not useful but
if needed by someone the information is still in the register value
of 'Source PSR ctl' inside of the brackets, PSR mode and Enabled was
squashed into Status, some renames and reorders and we have this
cleaner version. This will also make easy to parse debugfs for IGT
tests.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 96 +++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 38dcee1ca062..86303ba02666 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2665,7 +2665,8 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_sink_status);
 static void
 psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
 {
-	u32 val, psr_status;
+	u32 val, status_val;
+	const char *status = "unknown";
 
 	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
 		static const char * const live_status[] = {
@@ -2681,14 +2682,11 @@ psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
 			"BUF_ON",
 			"TG_ON"
 		};
-		psr_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
-		val = (psr_status & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
-			EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
-		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status)) {
-			seq_printf(m, "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n",
-				   psr_status, live_status[val]);
-			return;
-		}
+		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
+		status_val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
+			      EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
+		if (status_val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
+			status = live_status[status_val];
 	} else {
 		static const char * const live_status[] = {
 			"IDLE",
@@ -2700,74 +2698,78 @@ psr_source_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct seq_file *m)
 			"SRDOFFACK",
 			"SRDENT_ON",
 		};
-		psr_status = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS);
-		val = (psr_status & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
-			EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
-		if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status)) {
-			seq_printf(m, "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n",
-				   psr_status, live_status[val]);
-			return;
-		}
+		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS);
+		status_val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
+			      EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
+		if (status_val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
+			status = live_status[status_val];
 	}
 
-	seq_printf(m, "Source PSR status: 0x%x [%s]\n", psr_status, "unknown");
+	seq_printf(m, "Source PSR status: %s [0x%08x]\n", status, val);
 }
 
 static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
-	u32 psrperf = 0;
-	bool enabled = false;
-	bool sink_support;
+	struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
+	const char *status;
+	bool enabled;
+	u32 val;
 
 	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	sink_support = dev_priv->psr.sink_support;
-	seq_printf(m, "Sink_Support: %s\n", yesno(sink_support));
-	if (!sink_support)
+	seq_printf(m, "Sink support: %s", yesno(psr->sink_support));
+	if (!psr->sink_support) {
+		seq_puts(m, "\n");
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
+	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
-	seq_printf(m, "PSR mode: %s\n",
-		   dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled ? "PSR2" : "PSR1");
-	seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->psr.enabled));
-	seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%03x\n",
-		   dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
+	seq_printf(m, " [0x%08x]\n", psr->dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
 
-	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled)
-		enabled = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
+	if (psr->enabled)
+		status = psr->psr2_enabled ? "PSR2 enabled" : "PSR1 enabled";
 	else
-		enabled = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+		status = "disabled";
+	seq_printf(m, "Status: %s\n", status);
 
-	seq_printf(m, "Main link in standby mode: %s\n",
-		   yesno(dev_priv->psr.link_standby));
+	if (!psr->enabled)
+		goto unlock;
 
-	seq_printf(m, "HW Enabled & Active bit: %s\n", yesno(enabled));
+	if (psr->psr2_enabled) {
+		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
+		enabled = val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
+	} else {
+		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
+		enabled = val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+	}
+	seq_printf(m, "Source PSR ctl: %s [0x%08x]\n",
+		   enableddisabled(enabled), val);
+	psr_source_status(dev_priv, m);
+	seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%08x\n",
+		   psr->busy_frontbuffer_bits);
 
 	/*
 	 * SKL+ Perf counter is reset to 0 everytime DC state is entered
 	 */
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
-		psrperf = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT) &
-			EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK;
-
-		seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
+		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT) & EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK;
+		seq_printf(m, "Performance counter: %u\n", val);
 	}
 
-	psr_source_status(dev_priv, m);
-	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
-
-	if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->psr.debug) & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ) {
+	if (psr->debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ) {
 		seq_printf(m, "Last attempted entry at: %lld\n",
-			   dev_priv->psr.last_entry_attempt);
-		seq_printf(m, "Last exit at: %lld\n",
-			   dev_priv->psr.last_exit);
+			   psr->last_entry_attempt);
+		seq_printf(m, "Last exit at: %lld\n", psr->last_exit);
 	}
 
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-04 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 23:00 [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Allow PSR2 to be enabled when debugfs asks José Roberto de Souza
2018-12-04 23:00 ` José Roberto de Souza [this message]
2018-12-11  6:51   ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Refactor PSR status debugfs Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 12:44     ` Souza, Jose
2018-12-11 18:32       ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 18:54         ` Souza, Jose
2019-01-02 17:09           ` Souza, Jose
2019-01-02 19:02             ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-04 23:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/psr: Do not print last attempted entry or exit in PSR debugfs while in PSR2 José Roberto de Souza
2018-12-11  7:03   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 14:01     ` Souza, Jose
2018-12-04 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Add PSR2 selective update status registers and bits definitions José Roberto de Souza
2018-12-11  7:51   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 14:20     ` Souza, Jose
2018-12-04 23:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/debugfs: Print PSR selective update status register values José Roberto de Souza
2018-12-11 22:20   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-13 18:06     ` Souza, Jose
2018-12-04 23:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/psr: Allow PSR2 to be enabled when debugfs asks Patchwork
2018-12-04 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-12-05 11:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-12-11  3:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-11 12:29   ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181204230032.6352-2-jose.souza@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.