All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "zhengbin (A)" <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	houtao1@huawei.com, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Return EPERM on utime/utimes/lutimes calls instead of EACCESS in some cases
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:49:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205014900.GC6093@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfa4c769-79dd-79fe-c29f-75507719aec0@huawei.com>

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:43:06AM +0800, zhengbin (A) wrote:
>  second parameter of utime/utimes/lutimes is not NULL   -------> maybe lutimes should be removed? I think "second parameter of utime/utimes is not NULL" would be better

Also fixed, thanks.--b.

> 
> On 2018/12/5 9:37, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:04:22AM +0800, zhengbin (A) wrote:
> >> thanks,
> >>>>> As the man(3) page for utime/utimes/lutimes, EPERM is returned
> >>
> >> -------->this should be As the man page for utime/utimes/lutimes, my little mistake. utime/utimes are man(2), lutimes is man(3)
> >>
> >> I send v2 patch?Or when you apply, help modify it?
> > 
> > Does this look OK?
> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> > commit eb6d67589750
> > Author: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> > Date:   Fri Nov 30 16:04:25 2018 +0800
> > 
> >     nfsd: Return EPERM, not EACCES, in some SETATTR cases
> >     
> >     As the man(2) page for utime/utimes states, EPERM is returned when the
> >     second parameter of utime/utimes/lutimes is not NULL, the caller's
> >     effective UID does not match the owner of the file, and the caller is
> >     not privileged.
> >     
> >     However, in a NFS directory mounted from knfsd, it will return EACCES
> >     (from nfsd_setattr-> fh_verify->nfsd_permission).  This patch fixes
> >     that.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index eb67098117b4..9824e32b2f23 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -396,10 +396,23 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap,
> >  	bool		get_write_count;
> >  	bool		size_change = (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE);
> >  
> > -	if (iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_SIZE))
> > +	if (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
> >  		accmode |= NFSD_MAY_WRITE|NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE;
> > -	if (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE)
> >  		ftype = S_IFREG;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If utimes(2) and friends are called with times not NULL, we should
> > +	 * not set NFSD_MAY_WRITE bit. Otherwise fh_verify->nfsd_permission
> > +	 * will return EACCESS, when the caller's effective UID does not match
> > +	 * the owner of the file, and the caller is not privileged. In this
> > +	 * situation, we should return EPERM(notify_change will return this).
> > +	 */
> > +	if (iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME)) {
> > +		accmode |= NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE;
> > +		if (!(iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET)))
> > +			accmode |= NFSD_MAY_WRITE;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* Callers that do fh_verify should do the fh_want_write: */
> >  	get_write_count = !fhp->fh_dentry;
> > 
> > .
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-05  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-30  7:51 [PATCH] nfsd: Return EPERM on utime/utimes/lutimes calls instead of EACCESS in some cases zhengbin
2018-12-03  8:36 ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-04 20:13   ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-05  1:04     ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-05  1:37       ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-05  1:43         ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-05  1:49           ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2018-11-30  8:04 zhengbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181205014900.GC6093@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.