From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: hch@lst.de, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, vgupta@synopsys.com, matwey@sai.msu.ru,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, ezequiel@collabora.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ezequiel-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org,
vgupta-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
matwey-TTlVxmypnbovJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
openrisc-cunTk1MwBs9a3B2Vnqf2dGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org,
sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-snps-arc-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:22:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018@10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ezequiel-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org,
vgupta-HKixBCOQz3hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
matwey-TTlVxmypnbovJsYlp49lxw@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
openrisc-cunTk1MwBs9a3B2Vnqf2dGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org,
sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-snps-arc-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, ezequiel@collabora.com,
vgupta@synopsys.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, matwey@sai.msu.ru,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
hch@lst.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210.101039.1882227517259366533.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing. So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 221+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-08 17:41 make the non-consistent DMA allocator more userful (resend) Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] sparc: remove no needed sbus_dma_ops methods Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] sparc: factor the dma coherent mapping into helper Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] sparc: remove the sparc32_dma_ops indirection Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-15 6:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 6:30 ` [OpenRISC] " Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 6:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 6:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 6:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 6:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 10:47 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 10:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-15 14:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 14:57 ` [OpenRISC] " Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 14:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 14:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 14:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-15 14:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] sparc: remove not required includes from dma-mapping.h Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:57 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] sparc: move the leon PCI memory space comment to <asm/leon.h> Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 16:32 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 16:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 18:10 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 18:10 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-10 18:10 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 18:10 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 18:10 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 18:10 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-12-10 19:22 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 19:33 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-10 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-12-10 19:33 ` David Miller
2018-12-11 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-11 13:46 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-11 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-11 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-11 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-11 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-08 17:36 make the non-consistent DMA allocator more userful Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] dma-direct: provide a generic implementation of DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64/iommu: don't remap contiguous allocations for coherent devices Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-10 19:19 ` [OpenRISC] " Robin Murphy
2018-12-10 19:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-10 19:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-10 19:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-12-10 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64/iommu: implement support for DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm: implement DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 22:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-08 22:52 ` [OpenRISC] " Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-08 22:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-08 22:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-08 22:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-10 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:16 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-10 19:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/10] sparc64/iommu: move code around a bit Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/10] sparc64/iommu: implement DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/10] sparc64/pci_sun4v: move code around a bit Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] sparc64/pci_sun4v: implement DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` [OpenRISC] " David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-09 4:58 ` David Miller
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] dma-mapping: skip declared coherent memory for DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] Documentation: update the description " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-08 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181210192228.GB31178@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matwey@sai.msu.ru \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.