All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3] /net: memory interface (memif)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:07:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181213100709.2df8f718@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213133051.18779-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com>

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:30:51 +0100
Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com> wrote:

> +
> +typedef uint16_t memif_region_index_t;
> +typedef uint32_t memif_region_offset_t;
> +typedef uint64_t memif_region_size_t;
> +typedef uint16_t memif_ring_index_t;
> +typedef uint32_t memif_interface_id_t;
> +typedef uint16_t memif_version_t;
> +typedef uint8_t memif_log2_ring_size_t;
> +

Seems very typedef heavy to me. Having more typedefs
does not improve the readability.


> +typedef struct __attribute__ ((packed)) {

Use __rte_packed rather than attributes directly.

> +typedef struct __attribute__ ((packed)) {
> +	uint8_t if_name[32];
> +} memif_msg_connect_t;
> +

Why magic constant 32? Better to use something like

#define MEMIF_NAMESZ 32

Also, I am confused about how this relates
to DPDK device names and Linux network device names (if at all).

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-13 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-13 13:30 [RFC v3] /net: memory interface (memif) Jakub Grajciar
2018-12-13 18:07 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-12-14  9:39   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-12-14 16:12     ` Wiles, Keith
2019-01-04 17:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-04 19:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-04 19:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-04 19:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-20 11:52 ` [RFC v4] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-02-20 15:46   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-20 16:17   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-21 10:50   ` Rami Rosen
2019-02-27 17:04   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-22 11:57   ` [RFC v5] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-03-25 20:58     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-02 12:35       ` [dpdk-dev] " Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-05-03  4:27         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-06 11:00           ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-05-06 11:04             ` Damjan Marion (damarion)
2019-05-07 11:29               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-07 11:37                 ` Damjan Marion (damarion)
2019-05-08  7:53                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-09  8:30     ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v6] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-05-13 10:45       ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v7] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-05-16 11:46         ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v8] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-05-16 15:18           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-16 15:19           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-16 15:21           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-20  9:22             ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-05-16 15:25           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-16 15:28           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-20 10:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v9] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-05-29 17:29             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-30 12:38               ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-05-31  6:22             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface (memif) PMD Jakub Grajciar
2019-05-31  7:43               ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-06-03 11:28                 ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-06-03 14:25                   ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-06-05 12:01                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-03 13:37               ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-05 11:55               ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-06  9:24                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-06 10:25                   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-06-06 11:18                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-06-06  8:24               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-06-06 11:38                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-06-06 14:07                   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181213100709.2df8f718@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.