All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/perf: lock powergating configuration to default when active
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:06:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181231160636.13880-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181231160636.13880-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>

If some of the contexts submitting workloads to the GPU have been
configured to shutdown slices/subslices, we might loose the NOA
configurations written in the NOA muxes.

One possible solution to this problem is to reprogram the NOA muxes
when we switch to a new context. We initially tried this in the
workaround batchbuffer but some concerns where raised about the cost
of reprogramming at every context switch. This solution is also not
without consequences from the userspace point of view. Reprogramming
of the muxes can only happen once the powergating configuration has
changed (which happens after context switch). This means for a window
of time during the recording, counters recorded by the OA unit might
be invalid. This requires userspace dealing with OA reports to discard
the invalid values.

Minimizing the reprogramming could be implemented by tracking of the
last programmed configuration somewhere in GGTT and use MI_PREDICATE
to discard some of the programming commands, but the command streamer
would still have to parse all the MI_LRI instructions in the
workaround batchbuffer.

Another solution, which this change implements, is to simply disregard
the user requested configuration for the period of time when i915/perf
is active. There is no known issue with this apart from a performance
penality for some media workloads that benefit from running on a
partially powergated GPU. We already prevent RC6 from affecting the
programming so it doesn't sound completely unreasonable to hold on
powergating for the same reason.

v2: Leave RPCS programming in intel_lrc.c (Lionel)

v3: Update for s/union intel_sseu/struct intel_sseu/ (Lionel)
    More to_intel_context() (Tvrtko)
    s/dev_priv/i915/ (Tvrtko)

Tvrtko Ursulin:

v4:
 * Rebase for make_rpcs changes.

v5:
 * Apply OA restriction from make_rpcs directly.

v6:
 * Rebase for context image setup changes.

v7:
 * Move stream assignment before metric enable.

v8-9:
 * Rebase.

Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 13 +++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 4288c0e02f0c..7ac76c7aa4bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ static void gen8_update_reg_state_unlocked(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 
 		CTX_REG(reg_state, state_offset, flex_regs[i], value);
 	}
+
+	CTX_REG(reg_state, CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE,
+		gen8_make_rpcs(dev_priv,
+			       &to_intel_context(ctx,
+						 dev_priv->engine[RCS])->sseu));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2098,21 +2103,21 @@ static int i915_oa_stream_init(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_lock;
 
+	stream->ops = &i915_oa_stream_ops;
+	dev_priv->perf.oa.exclusive_stream = stream;
+
 	ret = dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.enable_metric_set(stream);
 	if (ret) {
 		DRM_DEBUG("Unable to enable metric set\n");
 		goto err_enable;
 	}
 
-	stream->ops = &i915_oa_stream_ops;
-
-	dev_priv->perf.oa.exclusive_stream = stream;
-
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 
 err_enable:
+	dev_priv->perf.oa.exclusive_stream = NULL;
 	dev_priv->perf.oa.ops.disable_metric_set(dev_priv);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index bf90df64c4a9..092a28b583f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1170,9 +1170,6 @@ static int __context_pin(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, struct i915_vma *vma)
 	return i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, flags);
 }
 
-static u32
-make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *ctx_sseu);
-
 static void
 __execlists_update_reg_state(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 			     struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -1186,8 +1183,8 @@ __execlists_update_reg_state(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 
 	/* RPCS */
 	if (engine->class == RENDER_CLASS)
-		regs[CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE + 1] = make_rpcs(engine->i915,
-							  &ce->sseu);
+		regs[CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE + 1] = gen8_make_rpcs(engine->i915,
+							       &ce->sseu);
 }
 
 static struct intel_context *
@@ -2327,13 +2324,12 @@ int logical_xcs_ring_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	return logical_ring_init(engine);
 }
 
-static u32
-make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *ctx_sseu)
+u32 gen8_make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *req_sseu)
 {
 	const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu = &INTEL_INFO(i915)->sseu;
 	bool subslice_pg = sseu->has_subslice_pg;
-	u8 slices = hweight8(ctx_sseu->slice_mask);
-	u8 subslices = hweight8(ctx_sseu->subslice_mask);
+	struct intel_sseu ctx_sseu;
+	u8 slices, subslices;
 	u32 rpcs = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -2343,6 +2339,19 @@ make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *ctx_sseu)
 	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 9)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * If i915/perf is active, we want a stable powergating configuration
+	 * on the system. The most natural configuration to take in that case
+	 * is the default (i.e maximum the hardware can do).
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(i915->perf.oa.exclusive_stream))
+		ctx_sseu = intel_device_default_sseu(i915);
+	else
+		ctx_sseu = *req_sseu;
+
+	slices = hweight8(ctx_sseu.slice_mask);
+	subslices = hweight8(ctx_sseu.subslice_mask);
+
 	/*
 	 * Since the SScount bitfield in GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE is only three bits
 	 * wide and Icelake has up to eight subslices, specfial programming is
@@ -2412,13 +2421,13 @@ make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *ctx_sseu)
 	if (sseu->has_eu_pg) {
 		u32 val;
 
-		val = ctx_sseu->min_eus_per_subslice << GEN8_RPCS_EU_MIN_SHIFT;
+		val = ctx_sseu.min_eus_per_subslice << GEN8_RPCS_EU_MIN_SHIFT;
 		GEM_BUG_ON(val & ~GEN8_RPCS_EU_MIN_MASK);
 		val &= GEN8_RPCS_EU_MIN_MASK;
 
 		rpcs |= val;
 
-		val = ctx_sseu->max_eus_per_subslice << GEN8_RPCS_EU_MAX_SHIFT;
+		val = ctx_sseu.max_eus_per_subslice << GEN8_RPCS_EU_MAX_SHIFT;
 		GEM_BUG_ON(val & ~GEN8_RPCS_EU_MAX_MASK);
 		val &= GEN8_RPCS_EU_MAX_MASK;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index f5a5502ecf70..a4e28cc55fda 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -104,4 +104,6 @@ void intel_lr_context_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 
 void intel_execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
 
+u32 gen8_make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_sseu *ctx_sseu);
+
 #endif /* _INTEL_LRC_H_ */
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-31 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-31 16:06 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Record the sseu configuration per-context & engine Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Add timeline barrier support Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to userspace (Gen11 only) Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/icl: Support co-existence between per-context SSEU and OA Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: Context SSEU reconfiguration tests Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating (rev9) Patchwork
2018-12-31 16:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-12-31 16:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-12-31 20:34 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-08 11:22 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/perf: lock powergating configuration to default when active Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:40   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-12-14 12:34 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-14 12:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/perf: lock powergating configuration to default when active Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181231160636.13880-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.