All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/14] arm64: KVM: Allow for direct call of HYP functions when using VHE
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:00:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190124140032.8588-3-christoffer.dall@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124140032.8588-1-christoffer.dall@arm.com>

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

When running VHE, there is no need to jump via some stub to perform
a "HYP" function call, as there is a single address space.

Let's thus change kvm_call_hyp() and co to perform a direct call
in this case. Although this results in a bit of code expansion,
it allows the compiler to check for type compatibility, something
that we are missing so far.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index e54cb7c88a4e..8b7702bdb219 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -370,8 +370,36 @@ void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
-#define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__)
-#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+/*
+ * The couple of isb() below are there to guarantee the same behaviour
+ * on VHE as on !VHE, where the eret to EL1 acts as a context
+ * synchronization event.
+ */
+#define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...)						\
+	do {								\
+		if (has_vhe()) {					\
+			f(__VA_ARGS__);					\
+			isb();						\
+		} else {						\
+			__kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+		}							\
+	} while(0)
+
+#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...)					\
+	({								\
+		typeof(f(__VA_ARGS__)) ret;				\
+									\
+		if (has_vhe()) {					\
+			ret = f(__VA_ARGS__);				\
+			isb();						\
+		} else {						\
+			ret = __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f),		\
+					     ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
+		}							\
+									\
+		ret;							\
+	})
 
 void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask);
 void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
-- 
2.18.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/14] arm64: KVM: Allow for direct call of HYP functions when using VHE
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:00:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190124140032.8588-3-christoffer.dall@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124140032.8588-1-christoffer.dall@arm.com>

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

When running VHE, there is no need to jump via some stub to perform
a "HYP" function call, as there is a single address space.

Let's thus change kvm_call_hyp() and co to perform a direct call
in this case. Although this results in a bit of code expansion,
it allows the compiler to check for type compatibility, something
that we are missing so far.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index e54cb7c88a4e..8b7702bdb219 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -370,8 +370,36 @@ void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
 
 u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
-#define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__)
-#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...) kvm_call_hyp(f, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+/*
+ * The couple of isb() below are there to guarantee the same behaviour
+ * on VHE as on !VHE, where the eret to EL1 acts as a context
+ * synchronization event.
+ */
+#define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...)						\
+	do {								\
+		if (has_vhe()) {					\
+			f(__VA_ARGS__);					\
+			isb();						\
+		} else {						\
+			__kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+		}							\
+	} while(0)
+
+#define kvm_call_hyp_ret(f, ...)					\
+	({								\
+		typeof(f(__VA_ARGS__)) ret;				\
+									\
+		if (has_vhe()) {					\
+			ret = f(__VA_ARGS__);				\
+			isb();						\
+		} else {						\
+			ret = __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f),		\
+					     ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
+		}							\
+									\
+		ret;							\
+	})
 
 void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask);
 void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-24 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-24 14:00 [PATCH 00/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Various rework in preparation of nested virt support Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 01/14] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce kvm_call_hyp_ret() Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2019-01-24 14:00   ` [PATCH 02/14] arm64: KVM: Allow for direct call of HYP functions when using VHE Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 03/14] arm64: KVM: Drop VHE-specific HYP call stub Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: KVM: Teach some form of type-safety to kvm_call_hyp Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 05/14] arm/arm64: KVM: Statically configure the host's view of MPIDR Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out VMID into struct kvm_vmid Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 19:01   ` James Morse
2019-01-24 19:01     ` James Morse
2019-01-25 10:09     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-25 10:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-25 11:05   ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-25 11:05     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-31 13:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-31 13:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-21 11:02   ` Julien Grall
2019-02-21 11:02     ` Julien Grall
2019-02-22  9:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-22  9:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-22 11:42       ` Julien Grall
2019-02-22 11:42         ` Julien Grall
2019-02-22 12:14         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-22 12:14           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Simplify bg_timer programming Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: arm64: Fix ICH_ELRSR_EL2 sysreg naming Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64: Reuse sys_reg() macro when searching the trap table Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-30  8:57   ` André Przywara
2019-01-30  8:57     ` André Przywara
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm/arm64: consolidate arch timer trap handlers Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-25 12:33   ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-25 12:33     ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-30 17:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-30 17:38       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: arm/arm64: timer: Rework data structures for multiple timers Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-18 15:10   ` André Przywara
2019-02-18 15:10     ` André Przywara
2019-02-19 12:27     ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-19 12:27       ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: arm/arm64: arch_timer: Assign the phys timer on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-18 15:10   ` André Przywara
2019-02-18 15:10     ` André Przywara
2019-02-19 12:43     ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-19 12:43       ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-20 17:58       ` Andre Przywara
2019-02-19 11:39   ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-02-19 11:39     ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-02-19 13:03     ` Christoffer Dall
2019-02-19 13:03       ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Rework the timer code to use a timer_map Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: arm/arm64: Move kvm_is_write_fault to header file Christoffer Dall
2019-01-24 14:00   ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190124140032.8588-3-christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --to=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.