All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: nf_nat: skip nat clash resolution for same-origin entries
Date: Tue,  5 Feb 2019 20:04:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205190415.25041-4-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205190415.25041-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: Martynas Pumputis <martynas@weave.works>

It is possible that two concurrent packets originating from the same
socket of a connection-less protocol (e.g. UDP) can end up having
different IP_CT_DIR_REPLY tuples which results in one of the packets
being dropped.

To illustrate this, consider the following simplified scenario:

1. Packet A and B are sent at the same time from two different threads
   by same UDP socket.  No matching conntrack entry exists yet.
   Both packets cause allocation of a new conntrack entry.
2. get_unique_tuple gets called for A.  No clashing entry found.
   conntrack entry for A is added to main conntrack table.
3. get_unique_tuple is called for B and will find that the reply
   tuple of B is already taken by A.
   It will allocate a new UDP source port for B to resolve the clash.
4. conntrack entry for B cannot be added to main conntrack table
   because its ORIGINAL direction is clashing with A and the REPLY
   directions of A and B are not the same anymore due to UDP source
   port reallocation done in step 3.

This patch modifies nf_conntrack_tuple_taken so it doesn't consider
colliding reply tuples if the IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL tuples are equal.

[ Florian: simplify patch to not use .allow_clash setting
  and always ignore identical flows ]

Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <martynas@weave.works>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 741b533148ba..db4d46332e86 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1007,6 +1007,22 @@ nf_conntrack_tuple_taken(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
 		}
 
 		if (nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone, net)) {
+			/* Tuple is taken already, so caller will need to find
+			 * a new source port to use.
+			 *
+			 * Only exception:
+			 * If the *original tuples* are identical, then both
+			 * conntracks refer to the same flow.
+			 * This is a rare situation, it can occur e.g. when
+			 * more than one UDP packet is sent from same socket
+			 * in different threads.
+			 *
+			 * Let nf_ct_resolve_clash() deal with this later.
+			 */
+			if (nf_ct_tuple_equal(&ignored_conntrack->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
+					      &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple))
+				continue;
+
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, found);
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			return 1;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-05 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 19:04 [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] selftests: netfilter: fix config fragment CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftests: netfilter: add simple masq/redirect test cases Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: nf_tables: unbind set in rule from commit path Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: ipv6: Don't preserve original oif for loopback address Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: nft_compat: don't use refcount_inc on newly allocated entry Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190205190415.25041-4-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.