All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: nft_compat: don't use refcount_inc on newly allocated entry
Date: Tue,  5 Feb 2019 20:04:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190205190415.25041-7-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205190415.25041-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

When I moved the refcount to refcount_t type I missed the fact that
refcount_inc() will result in use-after-free warning with
CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL=y builds.

The correct fix would be to init the reference count to 1 at allocation
time, but, unfortunately we cannot do this, as we can't undo that
in case something else fails later in the batch.

So only solution I see is to special-case the 'new entry' condition
and replace refcount_inc() with a "delayed" refcount_set(1) in this case,
as done here.

The .activate callback can be removed to simplify things, we only
need to make sure that deactivate() decrements/unlinks the entry
from the list at end of transaction phase (commit or abort).

Fixes: 12c44aba6618 ("netfilter: nft_compat: use refcnt_t type for nft_xt reference count")
Reported-by: Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
index 0732a2fc697c..fe64df848365 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
@@ -61,6 +61,21 @@ static struct nft_compat_net *nft_compat_pernet(struct net *net)
 	return net_generic(net, nft_compat_net_id);
 }
 
+static void nft_xt_get(struct nft_xt *xt)
+{
+	/* refcount_inc() warns on 0 -> 1 transition, but we can't
+	 * init the reference count to 1 in .select_ops -- we can't
+	 * undo such an increase when another expression inside the same
+	 * rule fails afterwards.
+	 */
+	if (xt->listcnt == 0)
+		refcount_set(&xt->refcnt, 1);
+	else
+		refcount_inc(&xt->refcnt);
+
+	xt->listcnt++;
+}
+
 static bool nft_xt_put(struct nft_xt *xt)
 {
 	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&xt->refcnt)) {
@@ -291,7 +306,7 @@ nft_target_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	nft_xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
-	refcount_inc(&nft_xt->refcnt);
+	nft_xt_get(nft_xt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -504,7 +519,7 @@ __nft_match_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
 		return ret;
 
 	nft_xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
-	refcount_inc(&nft_xt->refcnt);
+	nft_xt_get(nft_xt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -558,45 +573,16 @@ nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
 	__nft_match_destroy(ctx, expr, nft_expr_priv(expr));
 }
 
-static void nft_compat_activate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
-				const struct nft_expr *expr,
-				struct list_head *h)
-{
-	struct nft_xt *xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
-
-	if (xt->listcnt == 0)
-		list_add(&xt->head, h);
-
-	xt->listcnt++;
-}
-
-static void nft_compat_activate_mt(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
-				   const struct nft_expr *expr)
-{
-	struct nft_compat_net *cn = nft_compat_pernet(ctx->net);
-
-	nft_compat_activate(ctx, expr, &cn->nft_match_list);
-}
-
-static void nft_compat_activate_tg(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
-				   const struct nft_expr *expr)
-{
-	struct nft_compat_net *cn = nft_compat_pernet(ctx->net);
-
-	nft_compat_activate(ctx, expr, &cn->nft_target_list);
-}
-
 static void nft_compat_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 				  const struct nft_expr *expr,
 				  enum nft_trans_phase phase)
 {
 	struct nft_xt *xt = container_of(expr->ops, struct nft_xt, ops);
 
-	if (phase == NFT_TRANS_COMMIT)
-		return;
-
-	if (--xt->listcnt == 0)
-		list_del_init(&xt->head);
+	if (phase == NFT_TRANS_ABORT || phase == NFT_TRANS_COMMIT) {
+		if (--xt->listcnt == 0)
+			list_del_init(&xt->head);
+	}
 }
 
 static void
@@ -852,7 +838,6 @@ nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	nft_match->ops.eval = nft_match_eval;
 	nft_match->ops.init = nft_match_init;
 	nft_match->ops.destroy = nft_match_destroy;
-	nft_match->ops.activate = nft_compat_activate_mt;
 	nft_match->ops.deactivate = nft_compat_deactivate;
 	nft_match->ops.dump = nft_match_dump;
 	nft_match->ops.validate = nft_match_validate;
@@ -870,7 +855,7 @@ nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 
 	nft_match->ops.size = matchsize;
 
-	nft_match->listcnt = 1;
+	nft_match->listcnt = 0;
 	list_add(&nft_match->head, &cn->nft_match_list);
 
 	return &nft_match->ops;
@@ -957,7 +942,6 @@ nft_target_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	nft_target->ops.size = NFT_EXPR_SIZE(XT_ALIGN(target->targetsize));
 	nft_target->ops.init = nft_target_init;
 	nft_target->ops.destroy = nft_target_destroy;
-	nft_target->ops.activate = nft_compat_activate_tg;
 	nft_target->ops.deactivate = nft_compat_deactivate;
 	nft_target->ops.dump = nft_target_dump;
 	nft_target->ops.validate = nft_target_validate;
@@ -968,7 +952,7 @@ nft_target_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 	else
 		nft_target->ops.eval = nft_target_eval_xt;
 
-	nft_target->listcnt = 1;
+	nft_target->listcnt = 0;
 	list_add(&nft_target->head, &cn->nft_target_list);
 
 	return &nft_target->ops;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-05 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-05 19:04 [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] selftests: netfilter: fix config fragment CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftests: netfilter: add simple masq/redirect test cases Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] netfilter: nf_nat: skip nat clash resolution for same-origin entries Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: nf_tables: unbind set in rule from commit path Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: ipv6: Don't preserve original oif for loopback address Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-02-05 19:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2019-02-05 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] Netfilter fixes for net David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190205190415.25041-7-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.