* [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
@ 2019-02-11 15:45 Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 15:48 ` Chris Wilson
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-02-11 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
we do not use a stale pointer.
[ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
[ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
[ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
[ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
[ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
[ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
[ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
[ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
[ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
[ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
[ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[ 593.241158] Call Trace:
[ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
[ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
[ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
[ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
[ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
[ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
[ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
[ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
[ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
[ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
[ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
[ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
[ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
[ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
[ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
[ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index d01683167c77..177505b9c509 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
+ if (last != engine) /* if we drop the lock, refetch priolist */
+ last = NULL;
/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 15:48 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-02-11 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-02-11 15:45:30)
> If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
> the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
> engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
> we do not use a stale pointer.
>
> [ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
> [ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
> [ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
> [ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
> [ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
> [ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
> [ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
> [ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
> [ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
> [ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
> [ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> [ 593.241158] Call Trace:
> [ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
> [ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
> [ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
> [ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
> [ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
> [ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
> [ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
> [ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
> [ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
> [ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
> [ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
> [ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
> [ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
> [ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
> [ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
> [ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
> [ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> [ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> [ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
> [ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
> [ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
> [ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
> [ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
>
> Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
> Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index d01683167c77..177505b9c509 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
>
> engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
> + if (last != engine) /* if we drop the lock, refetch priolist */
> + last = NULL;
Alternatively (or perhaps future tweaking) would be to pass in a
cache_struct that we memset inside sched_lock_engine(0.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 15:48 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 16:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 17:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 18:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev2) Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-02-11 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
we do not use a stale pointer.
[ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
[ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
[ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
[ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
[ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
[ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
[ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
[ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
[ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
[ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
[ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[ 593.241158] Call Trace:
[ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
[ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
[ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
[ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
[ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
[ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
[ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
[ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
[ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
[ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
[ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
[ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
[ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
[ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
[ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
[ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
engine locks.
Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index d01683167c77..8bc042551692 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -223,8 +223,14 @@ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
return &p->requests[idx];
}
+struct sched_cache {
+ struct list_head *priolist;
+};
+
static struct intel_engine_cs *
-sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
+sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *locked,
+ struct sched_cache *cache)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine = node_to_request(node)->engine;
@@ -232,6 +238,7 @@ sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
if (engine != locked) {
spin_unlock(&locked->timeline.lock);
+ memset(cache, 0, sizeof(*cache));
spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
}
@@ -253,11 +260,11 @@ static bool inflight(const struct i915_request *rq,
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
{
- struct list_head *uninitialized_var(pl);
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine, *last;
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
struct i915_dependency stack;
const int prio = attr->priority;
+ struct sched_cache cache;
LIST_HEAD(dfs);
/* Needed in order to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
@@ -328,7 +335,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
__list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
}
- last = NULL;
+ memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
engine = rq->engine;
spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
@@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
- engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
+ engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
@@ -347,11 +354,11 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
node->attr.priority = prio;
if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
- if (last != engine) {
- pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
- last = engine;
- }
- list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
+ if (!cache.priolist)
+ cache.priolist =
+ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,
+ prio);
+ list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
} else {
/*
* If the request is not in the priolist queue because
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 17:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 17:44 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2019-02-11 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On 11/02/2019 16:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
> the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
> engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
> we do not use a stale pointer.
On first look one would observe current code is trying to re-acquire the prio list on changing the engine, so I guess the problem is this check is hidden under an additional conditional.
So a simpler approach of:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index d01683167c77..74896e7dbfa7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -341,16 +341,17 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
+ if (last != engine) {
+ pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
+ last = engine;
+ }
+
/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
continue;
node->attr.priority = prio;
if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
- if (last != engine) {
- pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
- last = engine;
- }
list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
} else {
/*
Would not be acceptable?
>
> [ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
> [ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
> [ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
> [ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
> [ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
> [ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
> [ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
> [ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
> [ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
> [ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
> [ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> [ 593.241158] Call Trace:
> [ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
> [ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
> [ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
> [ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
> [ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
> [ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
> [ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
> [ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
> [ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
> [ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> [ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
> [ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
> [ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
> [ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
> [ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
> [ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
> [ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
> [ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> [ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> [ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
> [ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
> [ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
> [ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
> [ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
>
> v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
> engine locks.
>
> Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
> Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index d01683167c77..8bc042551692 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,14 @@ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
> return &p->requests[idx];
> }
>
> +struct sched_cache {
> + struct list_head *priolist;
> +};
Do you plan to add more stuff since you decided to wrap into a struct
and use memset?
Regards,
Tvrtko
> +
> static struct intel_engine_cs *
> -sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
> +sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *locked,
> + struct sched_cache *cache)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = node_to_request(node)->engine;
>
> @@ -232,6 +238,7 @@ sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
>
> if (engine != locked) {
> spin_unlock(&locked->timeline.lock);
> + memset(cache, 0, sizeof(*cache));
> spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
> }
>
> @@ -253,11 +260,11 @@ static bool inflight(const struct i915_request *rq,
> static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
> const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
> {
> - struct list_head *uninitialized_var(pl);
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine, *last;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
> struct i915_dependency stack;
> const int prio = attr->priority;
> + struct sched_cache cache;
> LIST_HEAD(dfs);
>
> /* Needed in order to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
> @@ -328,7 +335,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
> __list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
> }
>
> - last = NULL;
> + memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
> engine = rq->engine;
> spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
>
> @@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
>
> - engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
> + engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
>
> /* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
> @@ -347,11 +354,11 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
>
> node->attr.priority = prio;
> if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
> - if (last != engine) {
> - pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
> - last = engine;
> - }
> - list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
> + if (!cache.priolist)
> + cache.priolist =
> + i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,
> + prio);
> + list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
> } else {
> /*
> * If the request is not in the priolist queue because
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 17:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
@ 2019-02-11 17:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 17:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-02-11 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin, intel-gfx
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-02-11 17:33:37)
>
> On 11/02/2019 16:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
> > the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
> > engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
> > we do not use a stale pointer.
>
> On first look one would observe current code is trying to re-acquire the prio list on changing the engine, so I guess the problem is this check is hidden under an additional conditional.
>
> So a simpler approach of:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index d01683167c77..74896e7dbfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -341,16 +341,17 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
> engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
>
> + if (last != engine) {
> + pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
> + last = engine;
> + }
> +
> /* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
> if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
> continue;
>
> node->attr.priority = prio;
> if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
> - if (last != engine) {
> - pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
> - last = engine;
> - }
> list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
> } else {
> /*
> Would not be acceptable?
It marks the priolist as used even though we may not populate it. That
extra conditional biting again, and it defeats the purpose of not having
to look up the priolist as often (for engines where we don't need to
touch the priority queue itself).
> > [ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
> > [ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > [ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
> > [ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
> > [ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
> > [ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
> > [ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
> > [ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
> > [ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
> > [ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
> > [ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
> > [ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
> > [ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> > [ 593.241158] Call Trace:
> > [ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
> > [ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
> > [ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
> > [ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
> > [ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
> > [ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
> > [ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> > [ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
> > [ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> > [ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
> > [ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
> > [ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
> > [ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
> > [ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
> > [ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
> > [ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
> > [ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
> > [ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
> > [ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > [ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
> > [ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > [ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> > [ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
> > [ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
> > [ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
> > [ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
> > [ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > [ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
> >
> > v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
> > engine locks.
> >
> > Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
> > Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > index d01683167c77..8bc042551692 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > @@ -223,8 +223,14 @@ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
> > return &p->requests[idx];
> > }
> >
> > +struct sched_cache {
> > + struct list_head *priolist;
> > +};
>
> Do you plan to add more stuff since you decided to wrap into a struct
> and use memset?
Not right now, but I preferred the approach of being having the switch
of engines also clearing the associated state.
I've thought about sticking something else in there, but I can't
remember what -- it's the iterative DFS that gets highlighted in profiles
(not too unsurprisingly). Oh, I remember it was about trying to fiddle
with per-engine queue priority before inflight().
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 17:44 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 17:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2019-02-11 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On 11/02/2019 17:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-02-11 17:33:37)
>>
>> On 11/02/2019 16:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
>>> the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
>>> engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
>>> we do not use a stale pointer.
>>
>> On first look one would observe current code is trying to re-acquire the prio list on changing the engine, so I guess the problem is this check is hidden under an additional conditional.
>>
>> So a simpler approach of:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>> index d01683167c77..74896e7dbfa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>> @@ -341,16 +341,17 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
>> engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
>> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
>>
>> + if (last != engine) {
>> + pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
>> + last = engine;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
>> if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
>> continue;
>>
>> node->attr.priority = prio;
>> if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
>> - if (last != engine) {
>> - pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
>> - last = engine;
>> - }
>> list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
>> } else {
>> /*
>> Would not be acceptable?
>
> It marks the priolist as used even though we may not populate it. That
> extra conditional biting again, and it defeats the purpose of not having
> to look up the priolist as often (for engines where we don't need to
> touch the priority queue itself).
Yep, my bad.
>>> [ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
>>> [ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>> [ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
>>> [ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
>>> [ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
>>> [ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
>>> [ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
>>> [ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
>>> [ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
>>> [ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
>>> [ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
>>> [ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
>>> [ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> [ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> [ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
>>> [ 593.241158] Call Trace:
>>> [ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
>>> [ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
>>> [ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
>>> [ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
>>> [ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
>>> [ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
>>> [ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
>>> [ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
>>> [ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
>>> [ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
>>> [ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
>>> [ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>> [ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
>>> [ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>>> [ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>>> [ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
>>> [ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>> [ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
>>> [ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
>>> [ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
>>>
>>> v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
>>> engine locks.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
>>> Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>>> index d01683167c77..8bc042551692 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
>>> @@ -223,8 +223,14 @@ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
>>> return &p->requests[idx];
>>> }
>>>
>>> +struct sched_cache {
>>> + struct list_head *priolist;
>>> +};
>>
>> Do you plan to add more stuff since you decided to wrap into a struct
>> and use memset?
>
> Not right now, but I preferred the approach of being having the switch
> of engines also clearing the associated state.
>
> I've thought about sticking something else in there, but I can't
> remember what -- it's the iterative DFS that gets highlighted in profiles
> (not too unsurprisingly). Oh, I remember it was about trying to fiddle
> with per-engine queue priority before inflight().
I am not sure about wrapping at this point, but I guess it's passable,
especially since it fixes a bug.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev2)
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 15:48 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 18:26 ` Patchwork
2019-02-11 20:46 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-02-11 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/56501/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Applying: drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
error: patch failed: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c:341
error: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c: patch does not apply
error: Did you hand edit your patch?
It does not apply to blobs recorded in its index.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
Patch failed at 0001 drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-11 18:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2019-02-11 20:46 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 22:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3) Patchwork
2019-02-12 0:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-02-11 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
we do not use a stale pointer.
[ 506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
[ 593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G U 5.0.0-rc6+ #100
[ 593.240879] Hardware name: /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
[ 593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
[ 593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
[ 593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
[ 593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
[ 593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
[ 593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
[ 593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
[ 593.241120] FS: 00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 593.241133] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[ 593.241158] Call Trace:
[ 593.241233] i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
[ 593.241326] i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
[ 593.241393] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
[ 593.241411] ? init_object+0x49/0x80
[ 593.241425] ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
[ 593.241491] ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241563] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241629] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
[ 593.241705] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241724] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
[ 593.241738] drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
[ 593.241803] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[ 593.241819] ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
[ 593.241834] ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
[ 593.241851] do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
[ 593.241880] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[ 593.241894] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[ 593.241907] do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
[ 593.241924] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
[ 593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[ 593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
[ 593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
[ 593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
[ 593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers
v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
engine locks.
Fixes: a02eb975be78 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index d01683167c77..8bc042551692 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -223,8 +223,14 @@ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
return &p->requests[idx];
}
+struct sched_cache {
+ struct list_head *priolist;
+};
+
static struct intel_engine_cs *
-sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
+sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *locked,
+ struct sched_cache *cache)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine = node_to_request(node)->engine;
@@ -232,6 +238,7 @@ sched_lock_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
if (engine != locked) {
spin_unlock(&locked->timeline.lock);
+ memset(cache, 0, sizeof(*cache));
spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
}
@@ -253,11 +260,11 @@ static bool inflight(const struct i915_request *rq,
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
{
- struct list_head *uninitialized_var(pl);
- struct intel_engine_cs *engine, *last;
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
struct i915_dependency stack;
const int prio = attr->priority;
+ struct sched_cache cache;
LIST_HEAD(dfs);
/* Needed in order to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
@@ -328,7 +335,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
__list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
}
- last = NULL;
+ memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
engine = rq->engine;
spin_lock_irq(&engine->timeline.lock);
@@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
- engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine);
+ engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline.lock);
/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
@@ -347,11 +354,11 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
node->attr.priority = prio;
if (!list_empty(&node->link)) {
- if (last != engine) {
- pl = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
- last = engine;
- }
- list_move_tail(&node->link, pl);
+ if (!cache.priolist)
+ cache.priolist =
+ i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,
+ prio);
+ list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
} else {
/*
* If the request is not in the priolist queue because
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3)
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-11 20:46 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
@ 2019-02-11 22:10 ` Patchwork
2019-02-12 0:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-02-11 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/56501/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5590 -> Patchwork_12198
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/56501/revisions/3/mbox/
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_12198 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
- fi-gdg-551: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103182]
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
- fi-apl-guc: INCOMPLETE [fdo#103927] -> PASS
* igt@pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-skl-6770hq: FAIL [fdo#108511] -> PASS
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
- fi-gdg-551: FAIL [fdo#103182] -> PASS
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#103182]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
[fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
[fdo#108511]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108511
[fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569
[fdo#108654]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108654
[fdo#109226]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109226
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
Participating hosts (47 -> 40)
------------------------------
Additional (1): fi-skl-6700hq
Missing (8): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-cfl-guc fi-ctg-p8600 fi-kbl-7560u fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_5590 -> Patchwork_12198
CI_DRM_5590: c853cc6da5214a4b6aca74bb7481cb691126697a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4817: 08cdb644686629dcf968c6cc00e054ed5f5aae6a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_12198: 303076c1c9bc29dac1457c48db1c547d9e383a39 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
303076c1c9bc drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12198/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3)
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-11 22:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2019-02-12 0:55 ` Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-02-12 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/56501/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5590_full -> Patchwork_12198_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_12198_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
- shard-snb: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#107799]
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@hang:
- shard-kbl: PASS -> INCOMPLETE [fdo#103665] / [fdo#109605 ]
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-128x42-onscreen:
- shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103232] +2
* igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible:
- shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#100368]
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-wc:
- shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103167]
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-render:
- shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103167] +1
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-opaque-fb:
- shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#108145]
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparant-fb:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> FAIL [fdo#108145]
* igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-a-tiling-y:
- shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103166] +3
* igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-a-tiling-yf:
- shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL [fdo#103166]
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@hang:
- shard-hsw: INCOMPLETE [fdo#103540] / [fdo#109605 ] -> PASS
* igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-max:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#108147] -> PASS
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-64x21-random:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#103232] -> PASS +5
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-alpha-opaque:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#109350] -> PASS
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
- shard-glk: FAIL [fdo#103167] -> PASS +1
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-mmap-wc:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#103167] -> PASS
* igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-c-planes:
- shard-glk: FAIL [fdo#103166] -> PASS +1
* igt@kms_plane_multiple@atomic-pipe-b-tiling-yf:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#103166] -> PASS +2
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-apl: FAIL [fdo#99912] -> PASS
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-dpms-suspend:
- shard-kbl: INCOMPLETE [fdo#103665] -> PASS
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#100368]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
[fdo#103166]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
[fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
[fdo#103232]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103232
[fdo#103540]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103540
[fdo#103665]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
[fdo#105411]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
[fdo#107799]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107799
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#108147]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108147
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109278]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
[fdo#109350]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109350
[fdo#109605 ]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109605
[fdo#99912]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
Participating hosts (7 -> 5)
------------------------------
Missing (2): shard-skl shard-iclb
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_5590 -> Patchwork_12198
CI_DRM_5590: c853cc6da5214a4b6aca74bb7481cb691126697a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4817: 08cdb644686629dcf968c6cc00e054ed5f5aae6a @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_12198: 303076c1c9bc29dac1457c48db1c547d9e383a39 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_12198/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-12 0:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-11 15:45 [PATCH] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 15:48 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 16:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 17:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 17:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 17:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 18:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev2) Patchwork
2019-02-11 20:46 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 22:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock (rev3) Patchwork
2019-02-12 0:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.