All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, holger@applied-asynchrony.com,
	"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	"Benjamin Gordon" <bmgordon@chromium.org>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] loop: properly observe rotational flag of underlying device
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:54:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212225424.139232-1-bmgordon@chromium.org> (raw)

From: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>

The loop driver always declares the rotational flag of its device as
rotational, even when the device of the mapped file is nonrotational,
as is the case with SSDs or on tmpfs. This can confuse filesystem tools
which are SSD-aware; in my case I frequently forget to tell mkfs.btrfs
that my loop device on tmpfs is nonrotational, and that I really don't
need any automatic metadata redundancy.

The attached patch fixes this by introspecting the rotational flag of the
mapped file's underlying block device, if it exists. If the mapped file's
filesystem has no associated block device - as is the case on e.g. tmpfs -
we assume nonrotational storage. If there is a better way to identify such
non-devices I'd love to hear them.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: holger@applied-asynchrony.com
Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
---
 This is a resend of Holger's original patch from
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/11/288 with the _unlocked functions
 updated.  We keep running into the same problem on Chrome OS that this
 originally solved; any chance it can go in?

 drivers/block/loop.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index cf5538942834..6c0fc0d49dc0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -900,6 +900,24 @@ static int loop_prepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void loop_update_rotational(struct loop_device *lo)
+{
+	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+	struct inode *file_inode = file->f_mapping->host;
+	struct block_device *file_bdev = file_inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
+	struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
+	bool nonrot = true;
+
+	/* not all filesystems (e.g. tmpfs) have a sb->s_bdev */
+	if (file_bdev)
+		nonrot = blk_queue_nonrot(bdev_get_queue(file_bdev));
+
+	if (nonrot)
+		blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
+	else
+		blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
+}
+
 static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
 		       struct block_device *bdev, unsigned int arg)
 {
@@ -963,6 +981,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
 	if (!(lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY) && file->f_op->fsync)
 		blk_queue_write_cache(lo->lo_queue, true, false);
 
+	loop_update_rotational(lo);
 	loop_update_dio(lo);
 	set_capacity(lo->lo_disk, size);
 	bd_set_size(bdev, size << 9);
-- 
2.20.1.791.gb4d0f1c61a-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12 22:54 Benjamin Gordon [this message]
2019-03-26 16:55 ` [PATCH] loop: properly observe rotational flag of underlying device Holger Hoffstätte
     [not found]   ` <CADaYBq32aM4QpHmOmevFWSkjYqWmBWdhgd7CDWh+Se6q_2byHg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-26 17:57     ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-11 15:21 Holger Hoffstätte
2015-11-11 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-11 22:08   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-01-11 23:20     ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-05-12 20:28       ` gwendal grignou
2016-05-12 22:30         ` Holger Hoffstätte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190212225424.139232-1-bmgordon@chromium.org \
    --to=bmgordon@chromium.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.