All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: properly observe rotational flag of underlying device
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:29:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5643B341.9010600@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56435D0F.80006@googlemail.com>

On 11/11/2015 08:21 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>
> The loop driver always declares the rotational flag of its device as
> rotational, even when the device of the mapped file is nonrotational,
> as is the case with SSDs or on tmpfs. This can confuse filesystem tools
> which are SSD-aware; in my case I frequently forget to tell mkfs.btrfs
> that my loop device on tmpfs is nonrotational, and that I really don't
> need any automatic metadata redundancy.
>
> The attached patch fixes this by introspecting the rotational flag of the
> mapped file's underlying block device, if it exists. If the mapped file's
> filesystem has no associated block device - as is the case on e.g. tmpfs -
> we assume nonrotational storage. If there is a better way to identify such
> non-devices I'd love to hear them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/block/loop.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 423f4ca..2984aca 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -843,6 +843,24 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
>   	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
>   }
>
> +static void loop_update_rotational(struct loop_device *lo)
> +{
> +	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
> +	struct inode *file_inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> +	struct block_device *file_bdev = file_inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
> +	struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue;
> +	bool nonrot = true;
> +
> +	/* not all filesystems (e.g. tmpfs) have a sb->s_bdev */
> +	if (file_bdev)
> +		nonrot = blk_queue_nonrot(bdev_get_queue(file_bdev));
> +
> +	if (nonrot)
> +		queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
> +	else
> +		queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
> +}

Are we sure we want to change the default from rot to nonrot?

Apart from that, looks good.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-11 15:21 [PATCH] loop: properly observe rotational flag of underlying device Holger Hoffstätte
2015-11-11 21:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-11-11 22:08   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-01-11 23:20     ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-05-12 20:28       ` gwendal grignou
2016-05-12 22:30         ` Holger Hoffstätte
2019-02-12 22:54 Benjamin Gordon
2019-03-26 16:55 ` Holger Hoffstätte
     [not found]   ` <CADaYBq32aM4QpHmOmevFWSkjYqWmBWdhgd7CDWh+Se6q_2byHg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-26 17:57     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5643B341.9010600@fb.com \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.