[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] CODING_STYLE: trivial update

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2] CODING_STYLE: trivial update

[Wei Yang]

The first one is suggested by Igor Mammedov to provide rule for multiline
code.

The second is a trivial fix to make example code all indented with 4 spaces.

v4:
  * one exception case for function
v3:
  * fix typo in both changelog and example
v2:
  * adjust Patch 1 as suggested by Eric


Wei Yang (2):
  CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code
  CODING_STYLE: indent example code as all others

 CODING_STYLE | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.19.1

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code

[Wei Yang]

We didn't specify the indent rule for multiline code here, which may
mislead users. And in current code, the code use different rules.

Add this rule in CODING_STYLE to make sure this is clear to every one.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

---
v4:
   * widths -> width
   * add an exception example for function
v3:
   * misleading -> mislead
   * add comma after arg2 in example
v2:
   * rephrase changelog suggested by Eric Blake
     - remove one redundant line
     - fix some awkward grammar
     - add { ; at the end of example
---
 CODING_STYLE | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index ec075dedc4..1bccf4f865 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
 
 Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
 
+1.1 Multiline Indent
+
+There are several places where indent is necessary:
+
+ - struct definition
+ - if/else
+ - while/for
+ - function definition & call
+
+When breaking up a long line to fit within line width, align the secondary
+lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first.
+
+For example:
+
+    if (a == 1 &&
+        b == 2) {
+
+    while (a == 1 &&
+           b == 2) {
+
+    do_something(arg1, arg2,
+                 arg3);
+
+One exception for function is indenting following lines relative to function
+name start:
+
+    do_something(arg1, arg2,
+        arg3);
+
 2. Line width
 
 Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.
-- 
2.19.1

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] CODING_STYLE: indent example code as all others

[Wei Yang]

All the example code are indented with four spaces except this one.

Fix this by adding four spaces here.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 CODING_STYLE | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index 1bccf4f865..e6d21dcd67 100644
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ block to a separate function altogether.
 When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
 constant on the right, as in:
 
-if (a == 1) {
-    /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
-    do_something();
-}
+    if (a == 1) {
+        /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
+        do_something();
+    }
 
 Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
 Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
-- 
2.19.1

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:25:29 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> We didn't specify the indent rule for multiline code here, which may
> mislead users. And in current code, the code use different rules.
diffrent from what? I'd use "various styles"

> 
> Add this rule in CODING_STYLE to make sure this is clear to every one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v4:
>    * widths -> width
>    * add an exception example for function
> v3:
>    * misleading -> mislead
>    * add comma after arg2 in example
> v2:
>    * rephrase changelog suggested by Eric Blake
>      - remove one redundant line
>      - fix some awkward grammar
>      - add { ; at the end of example
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> index ec075dedc4..1bccf4f865 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
>  
>  Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
>  
> +1.1 Multiline Indent
> +
> +There are several places where indent is necessary:
> +
> + - struct definition
> + - if/else
> + - while/for
> + - function definition & call
> +
> +When breaking up a long line to fit within line width, align the secondary
> +lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first.
 Probably it's not true for struct/function, they could use 4 spaces indent
 relative to previous line. I'd drop struct as it just follow generic block
 4 spaces rule. And describe possible function variants separately


> +
> +For example:
> +
> +    if (a == 1 &&
> +        b == 2) {
> +
> +    while (a == 1 &&
> +           b == 2) {
> +
> +    do_something(arg1, arg2,
> +                 arg3);
> +
> +One exception for function is indenting following lines relative to function
> +name start:
it's not really exception and used not only with functions, it's basically
generic 4 spaces indent. Another variant I've seen used is
    foo(x, y(z,
             h);
and variations of that


> +
> +    do_something(arg1, arg2,
> +        arg3);
> +
>  2. Line width
>  
>  Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] CODING_STYLE: indent example code as all others

[Igor Mammedov]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:25:30 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> All the example code are indented with four spaces except this one.
> 
> Fix this by adding four spaces here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  CODING_STYLE | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> index 1bccf4f865..e6d21dcd67 100644
> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> @@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ block to a separate function altogether.
>  When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
>  constant on the right, as in:
>  
> -if (a == 1) {
> -    /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
> -    do_something();
> -}
> +    if (a == 1) {
> +        /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
> +        do_something();
> +    }
>  
>  Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
>  Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code

[Wei Yang]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 03:36:14PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:25:29 +0800
>Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> We didn't specify the indent rule for multiline code here, which may
>> mislead users. And in current code, the code use different rules.
>diffrent from what? I'd use "various styles"
>
>> 
>> Add this rule in CODING_STYLE to make sure this is clear to every one.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> 
>> ---
>> v4:
>>    * widths -> width
>>    * add an exception example for function
>> v3:
>>    * misleading -> mislead
>>    * add comma after arg2 in example
>> v2:
>>    * rephrase changelog suggested by Eric Blake
>>      - remove one redundant line
>>      - fix some awkward grammar
>>      - add { ; at the end of example
>> ---
>>  CODING_STYLE | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
>> index ec075dedc4..1bccf4f865 100644
>> --- a/CODING_STYLE
>> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
>> @@ -29,6 +29,35 @@ Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
>>  
>>  Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
>>  
>> +1.1 Multiline Indent
>> +
>> +There are several places where indent is necessary:
>> +
>> + - struct definition
>> + - if/else
>> + - while/for
>> + - function definition & call
>> +
>> +When breaking up a long line to fit within line width, align the secondary
>> +lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first.
> Probably it's not true for struct/function, they could use 4 spaces indent
> relative to previous line. I'd drop struct as it just follow generic block
> 4 spaces rule. And describe possible function variants separately
>

That sounds reasonable. Let me adjust this.

>
>> +
>> +For example:
>> +
>> +    if (a == 1 &&
>> +        b == 2) {
>> +
>> +    while (a == 1 &&
>> +           b == 2) {
>> +
>> +    do_something(arg1, arg2,
>> +                 arg3);
>> +
>> +One exception for function is indenting following lines relative to function
>> +name start:
>it's not really exception and used not only with functions, it's basically
>generic 4 spaces indent. Another variant I've seen used is
>    foo(x, y(z,
>             h);
>and variations of that
>
>
>> +
>> +    do_something(arg1, arg2,
>> +        arg3);
>> +
>>  2. Line width
>>  
>>  Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me