All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:19:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228121901.GA26207@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1551354838-29902-1-git-send-email-clingutla@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 05:23:58PM +0530, Lingutla Chandrasekhar wrote:
> With commit '5bdd2b3f0f8 ("arm64: topology: add support to remove cpu
> topology sibling masks")', when cpu hotplugged out, it resets the cpu
> information in its sibling CPUs. If user changes capacity of any cpu,
> then the new capacity applied to all online cpus in the cluster.
>

Correct but you are now changing to apply the same to all the CPUs
in the package which is wrong.

> If any hot plugged out cpu in the same cluster comes back to online,
> then that would have different/stale capacity value.
>

Why not save the value ?

> Fix it by applying user supplied capacity to all possible cpus in the
> cluster.
>

NACK for the change. It changes for all the CPUs in the package/socket.
Though DT platforms have cluster ids as package ids, that's wrong and
must be fixed. So you need to fix this issuw without depending on the
package id. I have removed all the wrong users of the same and this is
also a wrong usage.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 11:53 [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-02-28 12:19 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-02-28 14:38   ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-02-28 15:25     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-02 13:30       ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-04 18:21         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05  9:23           ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:13             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 11:29               ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:36                 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 15:53                   ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-05 16:12                     ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 16:54                     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-06 15:22                       ` Morten Rasmussen
2019-03-06 15:27                         ` [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-06 15:27                           ` Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-07  7:28                           ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07  7:28                             ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07  9:31                             ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07  9:31                               ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07  9:57                               ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07  9:57                                 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 12:14                                 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 12:14                                   ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 15:04                                   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:04                                     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19                           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19                             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-08 11:45                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 11:45                             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 12:38                             ` [PATCH v2] " Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-08 12:38                               ` Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-27 10:56                               ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-27 10:56                                 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-06  9:48                 ` [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190228121901.GA26207@e107155-lin \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.