All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-03-07 10:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2019-03-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmsley, Tony Lindgren
  Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Arnd Bergmann, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel

omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
we get a warning with clang-8:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.

When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
inlined, so we never noticed in the past.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
  * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
  * No return value.
  */
-static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
+static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
 {
 	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
 		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-- 
2.20.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-03-07 10:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2019-03-07 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmsley, Tony Lindgren
  Cc: linux-omap, Nick Desaulniers, linux-arm-kernel, Arnd Bergmann,
	linux-kernel

omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
we get a warning with clang-8:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.

When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
inlined, so we never noticed in the past.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
  * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
  * No return value.
  */
-static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
+static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
 {
 	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
 		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-- 
2.20.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
  2019-03-07 10:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
  (?)
@ 2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2019-03-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmsley, Tony Lindgren, Nick Desaulniers,
	linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 
> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>  	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>  		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2019-03-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Tony Lindgren, Nick Desaulniers,
	linux-kernel, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 
> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>  	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>  		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2019-03-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Tony Lindgren, Nick Desaulniers,
	linux-kernel, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 
> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>  	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>  		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
  2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2019-03-14 15:07     ` Tony Lindgren
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2019-03-14 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nathan Chancellor
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Rajendra Nayak, Paul Walmsley, Nick Desaulniers,
	linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

* Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> [190307 15:36]:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> > we get a warning with clang-8:
> > 
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> > The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> > the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> > This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> > annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> > 
> > When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> > inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

Arnd please just apply this directly, this should not cause
merge conflicts:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-03-14 15:07     ` Tony Lindgren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2019-03-14 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nathan Chancellor
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Arnd Bergmann, Nick Desaulniers,
	linux-kernel, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

* Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> [190307 15:36]:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:35:50AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> > we get a warning with clang-8:
> > 
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> > The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> > the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> > This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> > annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> > 
> > When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> > inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

Arnd please just apply this directly, this should not cause
merge conflicts:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
  2019-06-19 13:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2019-06-19 14:27   ` Olof Johansson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2019-06-19 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: arm, Nathan Chancellor, Tony Lindgren, Rajendra Nayak,
	Paul Walmsley, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 
> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Applied to fixes. Thanks!


-Olof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-06-19 14:27   ` Olof Johansson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2019-06-19 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Tony Lindgren, linux-kernel, arm,
	Nathan Chancellor, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 
> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Applied to fixes. Thanks!


-Olof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
  2019-06-19 13:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2019-06-19 13:32   ` Andrew Murray
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Murray @ 2019-06-19 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: arm, Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Tony Lindgren, linux-kernel,
	Nathan Chancellor, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 

That's unfortunate, both omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup and
omap3xxx_prm_late_init are only ever called at init time (by prm_late_init
which is also __init annotated). However the omap3xxx_prm_ll_data
structure containing the late_init has a life beyond init. Otherwise I
would have suggested annotating omap3xxx_prm_late_init.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>

> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>  	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>  		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-06-19 13:32   ` Andrew Murray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Murray @ 2019-06-19 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Tony Lindgren, linux-kernel, arm,
	Nathan Chancellor, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
> we get a warning with clang-8:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
> The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
> the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
> This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
> 

That's unfortunate, both omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup and
omap3xxx_prm_late_init are only ever called at init time (by prm_late_init
which is also __init annotated). However the omap3xxx_prm_ll_data
structure containing the late_init has a life beyond init. Otherwise I
would have suggested annotating omap3xxx_prm_late_init.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>

> When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
> inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
>   * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
>   * No return value.
>   */
> -static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
> +static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
>  {
>  	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
>  		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
> -- 
> 2.20.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-06-19 13:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2019-06-19 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: arm
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Nathan Chancellor, Tony Lindgren, Rajendra Nayak,
	Paul Walmsley, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
we get a warning with clang-8:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.

When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
inlined, so we never noticed in the past.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
  * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
  * No return value.
  */
-static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
+static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
 {
 	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
 		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-- 
2.20.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
@ 2019-06-19 13:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2019-06-19 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: arm
  Cc: Paul Walmsley, Rajendra Nayak, Arnd Bergmann, Tony Lindgren,
	linux-kernel, Nathan Chancellor, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel

omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
we get a warning with clang-8:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.

When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
inlined, so we never noticed in the past.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
  * registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
  * No return value.
  */
-static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
+static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
 {
 	if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
 		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-- 
2.20.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-19 15:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-07 10:35 [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-07 10:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-07 15:36 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-03-07 15:36   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-03-14 15:07   ` Tony Lindgren
2019-03-14 15:07     ` Tony Lindgren
2019-06-19 13:04 Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-19 13:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-19 13:32 ` Andrew Murray
2019-06-19 13:32   ` Andrew Murray
2019-06-19 14:27 ` Olof Johansson
2019-06-19 14:27   ` Olof Johansson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.