* usb-serial: fix mos_parport refcount imbalance on error path
@ 2019-03-20 2:29 Lin Yi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lin Yi @ 2019-03-20 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-usb; +Cc: gregkh, zhiyunq, csong, ljian236, yiqiuping
write_parport_ref_nonblock increase mos_parport refcount without
decrease it when return -ENOMEM code, so need a decrement before function
return -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Lin Yi <teroincn@163.com>
---
drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
index fc52ac7..6abb335 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
@@ -371,12 +371,14 @@ static int write_parport_reg_nonblock(struct mos7715_parport *mos_parport,
urbtrack->urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!urbtrack->urb) {
kfree(urbtrack);
+ kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
return -ENOMEM;
}
urbtrack->setup = kmalloc(sizeof(*urbtrack->setup), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!urbtrack->setup) {
usb_free_urb(urbtrack->urb);
kfree(urbtrack);
+ kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
return -ENOMEM;
}
urbtrack->setup->bRequestType = (__u8)0x40;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* usb-serial: fix mos_parport refcount imbalance on error path
@ 2019-03-20 9:05 Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2019-03-20 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jian Liu/Gmail; +Cc: linux-usb, zhiyunq, csong, yiqiuping, teroincn
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:59:02PM +0800, Jian Liu/Gmail wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We might find a security issue in function
> 'write_parport_reg_nonbloc'(for source codes, please refer to
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c),
> which is logically an unbalanced reference count vulnerability.
>
> Let us check ref_count 'mos_parport->ref_count' of kernel object
> 'mos_parport' in the function. In 'Line 369:
> kref_get(&mos_parport->ref_count)' and 'Line 370:
> urbtrack->mos_parport = mos_parport', the ref_count has been increased
> because of a new variable 'urbtrack->mos_parport' pointing to
> 'mos_parport', that make sense to balance ref_count. However, at 'Line
> 373 and Line 379: kfree(urbtrack)', variable 'urbtrack' has been freed
> before a return, which will make 'urbtrack->mos_parport' freed, too.
> But, a decreasing of 'mos_parport->ref_count' is missing in the
> current kernel version, which will bring an unbalanced reference
> count.
>
> We have wrote a patch showed in Lin's email. The idea is simple. We
> added a calling of 'kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count,
> destroy_mos_parport)' below Line 373 and Line 379. Currently, we are
> not sure if this is really a vulnerability. If you are familiar with
> codes, please help to verify it.
Yes, this is a bugfix, but not really a "vulnerability" as it is almost
impossible to keep hitting a memory allocation failure enough times to
cause any problems here.
The most that can happen is that the reference really is not dropped,
and memory leaks. Not a big deal, if memory is failing to be allocated,
your system has bigger issues at the moment :)
So it's just a nice bugfix, for a failure mode that is pretty much
impossible to ever hit in the "wild".
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* usb-serial: fix mos_parport refcount imbalance on error path
@ 2019-03-20 9:04 Johan Hovold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johan Hovold @ 2019-03-20 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lin Yi; +Cc: linux-usb, gregkh, zhiyunq, csong, ljian236, yiqiuping
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:29:16AM +0800, Lin Yi wrote:
> write_parport_ref_nonblock increase mos_parport refcount without
> decrease it when return -ENOMEM code, so need a decrement before function
> return -ENOMEM.
Good catch!
Your patch looks good, but wouldn't it be better to move the kref_get()
(and mos_parport assignment) to the end of the urbtrack initialisation
instead?
That way you wouldn't have to add any kref_puts() at all.
> Signed-off-by: Lin Yi <teroincn@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> index fc52ac7..6abb335 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> @@ -371,12 +371,14 @@ static int write_parport_reg_nonblock(struct mos7715_parport *mos_parport,
> urbtrack->urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!urbtrack->urb) {
> kfree(urbtrack);
> + kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> urbtrack->setup = kmalloc(sizeof(*urbtrack->setup), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!urbtrack->setup) {
> usb_free_urb(urbtrack->urb);
> kfree(urbtrack);
> + kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> urbtrack->setup->bRequestType = (__u8)0x40;
Thanks,
Johan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* usb-serial: fix mos_parport refcount imbalance on error path
@ 2019-03-20 8:59 Jian Liu/Gmail
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jian Liu/Gmail @ 2019-03-20 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-usb, gregkh; +Cc: zhiyunq, csong, yiqiuping, teroincn, ljian236
Hi all,
We might find a security issue in function
'write_parport_reg_nonbloc'(for source codes, please refer to
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c),
which is logically an unbalanced reference count vulnerability.
Let us check ref_count 'mos_parport->ref_count' of kernel object
'mos_parport' in the function. In 'Line 369:
kref_get(&mos_parport->ref_count)' and 'Line 370:
urbtrack->mos_parport = mos_parport', the ref_count has been increased
because of a new variable 'urbtrack->mos_parport' pointing to
'mos_parport', that make sense to balance ref_count. However, at 'Line
373 and Line 379: kfree(urbtrack)', variable 'urbtrack' has been freed
before a return, which will make 'urbtrack->mos_parport' freed, too.
But, a decreasing of 'mos_parport->ref_count' is missing in the
current kernel version, which will bring an unbalanced reference
count.
We have wrote a patch showed in Lin's email. The idea is simple. We
added a calling of 'kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count,
destroy_mos_parport)' below Line 373 and Line 379. Currently, we are
not sure if this is really a vulnerability. If you are familiar with
codes, please help to verify it.
Thanks.
Jian
2019-03-20 10:29 GMT+08:00, Lin Yi <teroincn@163.com>:
> write_parport_ref_nonblock increase mos_parport refcount without
> decrease it when return -ENOMEM code, so need a decrement before function
> return -ENOMEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Yi <teroincn@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> index fc52ac7..6abb335 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c
> @@ -371,12 +371,14 @@ static int write_parport_reg_nonblock(struct
> mos7715_parport *mos_parport,
> urbtrack->urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!urbtrack->urb) {
> kfree(urbtrack);
> + kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> urbtrack->setup = kmalloc(sizeof(*urbtrack->setup), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!urbtrack->setup) {
> usb_free_urb(urbtrack->urb);
> kfree(urbtrack);
> + kref_put(&mos_parport->ref_count, destroy_mos_parport);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> urbtrack->setup->bRequestType = (__u8)0x40;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-20 9:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-20 2:29 usb-serial: fix mos_parport refcount imbalance on error path Lin Yi
2019-03-20 8:59 Jian Liu/Gmail
2019-03-20 9:04 Johan Hovold
2019-03-20 9:05 Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.