All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<julien.thierry@arm.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
	<lious.lilei@hisilicon.com>, <lishuo1@hisilicon.com>,
	<zhengxiang9@huawei.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	<christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: arm: Fix handling of stage2 huge mappings
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320172417.6e769373@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c27d5828-3924-e209-82b6-c9168007867b@arm.com>

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:12:47 +0000
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:

> Marc,
> 
> On 20/03/2019 10:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:23:39 +0000
> > Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Suzuki,
> >   
> >> Marc,
> >>
> >> On 20/03/2019 10:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:44:38 +0000
> >>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> >>>    >>>> Hi Marc,  
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20/03/2019 08:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>>>> Hi Suzuki,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:11:08 +0000,
> >>>>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> >>>>>> +		if (!pmd_thp_or_huge(old_pmd)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PMD_MASK, S2_PMD_SIZE);
> >>>>>> +			goto retry;  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>>>> +		if (!stage2_pud_huge(kvm, old_pud)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PUD_MASK, S2_PUD_SIZE);  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>> We should really get rid of the S2_P{U/M}D_* definitions, as they are
> >>>> always the same as the host. The only thing that changes is the PGD size
> >>>> which varies according to the IPA and the concatenation.  
> >>>>   >>  
> >> Also what do you think about using  P{M,U}D_* instead of S2_P{M,U}D_*
> >> above ? I could make that change with the respin.  
> > 
> > Given that this is a fix, I'd like it to be as small as obvious as
> > possible, making it easier to backport.
> > 
> > I'm happy to take another patch for 5.2 that will drop the whole S2_P*
> > if we still think that this should be the case (though what I'd really
> > like is to have architectural levels instead of these arbitrary
> > definitions).  
> 
> I only meant the two new instances added above in the patch. Of course, I
> could send something to fix the existing ones.

I'd rather be consistent, and use the same names all over the code.
Once we decide to change, we do it all in one go.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	julien.thierry@arm.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
	lious.lilei@hisilicon.com, lishuo1@hisilicon.com,
	zhengxiang9@huawei.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: arm: Fix handling of stage2 huge mappings
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320172417.6e769373@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c27d5828-3924-e209-82b6-c9168007867b@arm.com>

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:12:47 +0000
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:

> Marc,
> 
> On 20/03/2019 10:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:23:39 +0000
> > Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Suzuki,
> >   
> >> Marc,
> >>
> >> On 20/03/2019 10:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:44:38 +0000
> >>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> >>>    >>>> Hi Marc,  
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20/03/2019 08:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>>>> Hi Suzuki,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:11:08 +0000,
> >>>>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> >>>>>> +		if (!pmd_thp_or_huge(old_pmd)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PMD_MASK, S2_PMD_SIZE);
> >>>>>> +			goto retry;  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>>>> +		if (!stage2_pud_huge(kvm, old_pud)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PUD_MASK, S2_PUD_SIZE);  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>> We should really get rid of the S2_P{U/M}D_* definitions, as they are
> >>>> always the same as the host. The only thing that changes is the PGD size
> >>>> which varies according to the IPA and the concatenation.  
> >>>>   >>  
> >> Also what do you think about using  P{M,U}D_* instead of S2_P{M,U}D_*
> >> above ? I could make that change with the respin.  
> > 
> > Given that this is a fix, I'd like it to be as small as obvious as
> > possible, making it easier to backport.
> > 
> > I'm happy to take another patch for 5.2 that will drop the whole S2_P*
> > if we still think that this should be the case (though what I'd really
> > like is to have architectural levels instead of these arbitrary
> > definitions).  
> 
> I only meant the two new instances added above in the patch. Of course, I
> could send something to fix the existing ones.

I'd rather be consistent, and use the same names all over the code.
Once we decide to change, we do it all in one go.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, julien.thierry@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
	zhengxiang9@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	lishuo1@hisilicon.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lious.lilei@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: arm: Fix handling of stage2 huge mappings
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:24:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320172417.6e769373@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c27d5828-3924-e209-82b6-c9168007867b@arm.com>

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:12:47 +0000
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:

> Marc,
> 
> On 20/03/2019 10:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:23:39 +0000
> > Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Suzuki,
> >   
> >> Marc,
> >>
> >> On 20/03/2019 10:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:44:38 +0000
> >>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> >>>    >>>> Hi Marc,  
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20/03/2019 08:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:  
> >>>>> Hi Suzuki,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:11:08 +0000,
> >>>>> Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> >>>>>> +		if (!pmd_thp_or_huge(old_pmd)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PMD_MASK, S2_PMD_SIZE);
> >>>>>> +			goto retry;  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>>>> +		if (!stage2_pud_huge(kvm, old_pud)) {
> >>>>>> +			unmap_stage2_range(kvm, addr & S2_PUD_MASK, S2_PUD_SIZE);  
> >>>>>   >>  
> >>>> We should really get rid of the S2_P{U/M}D_* definitions, as they are
> >>>> always the same as the host. The only thing that changes is the PGD size
> >>>> which varies according to the IPA and the concatenation.  
> >>>>   >>  
> >> Also what do you think about using  P{M,U}D_* instead of S2_P{M,U}D_*
> >> above ? I could make that change with the respin.  
> > 
> > Given that this is a fix, I'd like it to be as small as obvious as
> > possible, making it easier to backport.
> > 
> > I'm happy to take another patch for 5.2 that will drop the whole S2_P*
> > if we still think that this should be the case (though what I'd really
> > like is to have architectural levels instead of these arbitrary
> > definitions).  
> 
> I only meant the two new instances added above in the patch. Of course, I
> could send something to fix the existing ones.

I'd rather be consistent, and use the same names all over the code.
Once we decide to change, we do it all in one go.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-20 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11 16:31 [RFC] Question about TLB flush while set Stage-2 huge pages Zheng Xiang
2019-03-11 16:31 ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-11 16:31 ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-12 11:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-12 11:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-12 15:30   ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-12 15:30     ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-12 15:30     ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-12 18:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-12 18:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-13  9:45       ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-13  9:45         ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-13  9:45         ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-14 10:55         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-14 10:55           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-14 15:50           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-14 15:50             ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-14 15:50             ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-15  8:21             ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-15  8:21               ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-15  8:21               ` Zheng Xiang
2019-03-15 14:56               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-15 14:56                 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-17 13:34                 ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-17 13:34                   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-17 13:34                   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-18 17:34                   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-18 17:34                     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-19  9:05                     ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-19  9:05                       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-19  9:05                       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-19 14:11                       ` [PATCH] kvm: arm: Fix handling of stage2 huge mappings Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-19 14:11                         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-19 16:02                         ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-19 16:02                           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-19 16:02                           ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-20  8:15                         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20  8:15                           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20  8:15                           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20  9:44                           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20  9:44                             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20  9:44                             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20 10:11                             ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 10:11                               ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 10:11                               ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 10:23                               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20 10:23                                 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20 10:35                                 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 10:35                                   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 10:35                                   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 11:12                                   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20 11:12                                     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-20 17:24                                     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-03-20 17:24                                       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-20 17:24                                       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-17 13:55                 ` [RFC] Question about TLB flush while set Stage-2 huge pages Zenghui Yu
2019-03-17 13:55                   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-03-17 13:55                   ` Zenghui Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190320172417.6e769373@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lious.lilei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=lishuo1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengxiang9@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.