All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pakki001@umn.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: pcie-xilinx: fix a missing-check bug for __get_free_pages
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:51:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325215105.GB24180@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190325213113.24705-1-kjlu@umn.edu>

Hi Kangjie,

Thanks for the patch!

Please update the subject line like this:

  PCI: xilinx: Check for __get_free_pages() failure

You can always get a good idea of the style for subject lines by doing
something like this:

  git log --oneline --follow drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:31:13PM -0500, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> In case __get_free_pages fail, the fix returns -ENOMEMto avoid
> NULL pointer dereference.

s/In case/If/
s/__get_free_pages/__get_free_pages()/
s/fail/fails/
s/the fix returns/return/
s/-ENOMEMto/-ENOMEM to/

> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

I didn't see Steven's reviewed-by on the mailing list.  I did see his
*review*, but his "Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>"
implies that he reviewed it *and* believes it to ready for merging
(see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for all the
details).

So we should only add the Reviewed-by tag after Steven himself posts
it.

> ---
> v2: caller is redefined to accept the error code, as suggested by
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> index 9bd1a35cd5d8..abc214e94f7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -336,14 +336,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>   * xilinx_pcie_enable_msi - Enable MSI support
>   * @port: PCIe port information
>   */
> -static void xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> +static int xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
>  
>  	port->msi_pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> +	if (unlikely(!port->msi_pages))
> +		return -ENOMEM;

No need to use "unlikely()" here.  It *is* unlikely that
__get_free_pages() will fail, but the annotation clutters the code a
bit, so I prefer to avoid it except for performance paths.

This should probably be documented somewhere in
Documentation/process/, but regrettably, it isn't (yet).

>  	msg_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)port->msi_pages);
>  	pcie_write(port, 0x0, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
>  	pcie_write(port, msg_addr, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* INTx Functions */
> @@ -498,6 +503,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  	struct device *dev = port->dev;
>  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>  	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Setup INTx */
>  	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
> @@ -526,7 +532,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
>  
> -		xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> +		ret = xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pakki001@umn.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: pcie-xilinx: fix a missing-check bug for __get_free_pages
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:51:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190325215105.GB24180@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190325213113.24705-1-kjlu@umn.edu>

Hi Kangjie,

Thanks for the patch!

Please update the subject line like this:

  PCI: xilinx: Check for __get_free_pages() failure

You can always get a good idea of the style for subject lines by doing
something like this:

  git log --oneline --follow drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:31:13PM -0500, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> In case __get_free_pages fail, the fix returns -ENOMEMto avoid
> NULL pointer dereference.

s/In case/If/
s/__get_free_pages/__get_free_pages()/
s/fail/fails/
s/the fix returns/return/
s/-ENOMEMto/-ENOMEM to/

> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

I didn't see Steven's reviewed-by on the mailing list.  I did see his
*review*, but his "Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>"
implies that he reviewed it *and* believes it to ready for merging
(see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for all the
details).

So we should only add the Reviewed-by tag after Steven himself posts
it.

> ---
> v2: caller is redefined to accept the error code, as suggested by
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> index 9bd1a35cd5d8..abc214e94f7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -336,14 +336,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>   * xilinx_pcie_enable_msi - Enable MSI support
>   * @port: PCIe port information
>   */
> -static void xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> +static int xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  {
>  	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
>  
>  	port->msi_pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> +	if (unlikely(!port->msi_pages))
> +		return -ENOMEM;

No need to use "unlikely()" here.  It *is* unlikely that
__get_free_pages() will fail, but the annotation clutters the code a
bit, so I prefer to avoid it except for performance paths.

This should probably be documented somewhere in
Documentation/process/, but regrettably, it isn't (yet).

>  	msg_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)port->msi_pages);
>  	pcie_write(port, 0x0, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
>  	pcie_write(port, msg_addr, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* INTx Functions */
> @@ -498,6 +503,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  	struct device *dev = port->dev;
>  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>  	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Setup INTx */
>  	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
> @@ -526,7 +532,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
>  
> -		xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> +		ret = xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-25 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-14  5:58 [PATCH] pci: pcie-xilinx: fix a missing-check bug for __get_free_pages Kangjie Lu
2019-03-14  5:58 ` Kangjie Lu
2019-03-22 16:26 ` Steven Price
2019-03-22 16:26   ` Steven Price
2019-03-25 21:31   ` [PATCH v2] " Kangjie Lu
2019-03-25 21:31     ` Kangjie Lu
2019-03-25 21:51     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-03-25 21:51       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-25 22:19       ` [PATCH v3] PCI: xilinx: Check for __get_free_pages() failure Kangjie Lu
2019-03-25 22:19         ` Kangjie Lu
2019-03-26 11:40         ` Steven Price
2019-03-26 11:40           ` Steven Price
2019-03-27 13:36         ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-27 13:36           ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-29 16:36         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-29 16:36           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-23 21:04 [PATCH v2] pci: pcie-xilinx: fix a missing-check bug for __get_free_pages Aditya Pakki
2019-03-23 21:04 ` Aditya Pakki
2019-03-25 12:08 ` Steven Price
2019-03-25 12:08   ` Steven Price
2019-03-26 13:01 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-26 13:01   ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190325215105.GB24180@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=pakki001@umn.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.