From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190326135557.GD9224@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326133947.pbniwkvszlahw3dr@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:39:47PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:17:46PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > The patch series by Petr I mentioned takes care about OF case. But it doesn't
> > have covered yours by obvious reasons.
>
> Do you happen to have a pointer to it?
Petr, can you share what is the state of affairs with that series?
> The behaviour on others is different indeed, you're generally printing a
> single item at a time. The question rather is, whether we want to be
> compatible with %pOF going forward or not. I'd prefer that, so using the
> fwnode API would be easier.
I would prefer to mimic %pOF and actually to deprecate it in favour of %pfw.
But it's just mine opinion. I'm skeptical about getting support on it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 15:29 [PATCH 0/5] Device property improvements, add %pfw format specifier Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] device property: Add functions for accessing node's parents Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] device property: Add fwnode_get_name for returning the name of a node Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 17:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-03-24 18:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] device property: Add a function to obtain a node's prefix Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators Sakari Ailus
2019-03-27 12:53 ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-27 13:49 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 17:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 18:17 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 13:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-26 13:39 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2019-03-26 14:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 15:21 ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-26 14:06 ` Heikki Krogerus
2019-03-26 14:12 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 14:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-26 15:50 ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-26 14:30 ` Heikki Krogerus
2019-03-26 15:13 ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-27 14:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-28 14:35 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190326135557.GD9224@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.