From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v12 1/8] arm64: arm_pmu: remove unnecessary isb instruction Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:37:24 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190328103731.27264-2-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190328103731.27264-1-andrew.murray@arm.com> The armv8pmu_enable_event_counter function issues an isb instruction after enabling a pair of counters - this doesn't provide any value and is inconsistent with the armv8pmu_disable_event_counter. In any case armv8pmu_enable_event_counter is always called with the PMU stopped. Starting the PMU with armv8pmu_start results in an isb instruction being issued prior to writing to PMCR_EL0. Let's remove the unnecessary isb instruction. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index 4addb38bc250..cccf4fc86d67 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ static inline void armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(struct perf_event *event) armv8pmu_enable_counter(idx); if (armv8pmu_event_is_chained(event)) armv8pmu_enable_counter(idx - 1); - isb(); } static inline int armv8pmu_disable_counter(int idx) -- 2.21.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Subject: [PATCH v12 1/8] arm64: arm_pmu: remove unnecessary isb instruction Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:37:24 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190328103731.27264-2-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190328103731.27264-1-andrew.murray@arm.com> The armv8pmu_enable_event_counter function issues an isb instruction after enabling a pair of counters - this doesn't provide any value and is inconsistent with the armv8pmu_disable_event_counter. In any case armv8pmu_enable_event_counter is always called with the PMU stopped. Starting the PMU with armv8pmu_start results in an isb instruction being issued prior to writing to PMCR_EL0. Let's remove the unnecessary isb instruction. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c index 4addb38bc250..cccf4fc86d67 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ static inline void armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(struct perf_event *event) armv8pmu_enable_counter(idx); if (armv8pmu_event_is_chained(event)) armv8pmu_enable_counter(idx - 1); - isb(); } static inline int armv8pmu_disable_counter(int idx) -- 2.21.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 10:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-03-28 10:37 [PATCH v12 0/8] arm64: Support perf event modifiers :G and :H Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray [this message] 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] arm64: arm_pmu: remove unnecessary isb instruction Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] arm64: KVM: encapsulate kvm_cpu_context in kvm_host_data Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 15:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-03-28 15:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-09 10:52 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 10:52 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 10:52 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 16:09 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 16:09 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 16:14 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 16:14 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 19:34 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 19:34 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] arm64: KVM: add accessors to track guest/host only counters Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] arm64: arm_pmu: Add !VHE support for exclude_host/exclude_guest attributes Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 16:34 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 16:34 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 19:48 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 19:48 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] arm64: KVM: Enable !VHE support for :G/:H perf event modifiers Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] arm64: KVM: Enable VHE " Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 17:52 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-09 17:52 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-09 17:52 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-09 19:13 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 19:13 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 19:13 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] arm64: KVM: avoid isb's by using direct pmxevtyper sysreg Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] arm64: docs: document perf event attributes Andrew Murray 2019-03-28 10:37 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 16:21 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 16:21 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-04 19:33 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-04 19:33 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-05 12:43 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-05 12:43 ` Will Deacon 2019-04-09 11:00 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 11:00 ` Andrew Murray 2019-04-09 11:00 ` Andrew Murray
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190328103731.27264-2-andrew.murray@arm.com \ --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.