All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] vl: Simplify machine_parse()
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:15:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404231526.GA17148@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875zrt69iy.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:26:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>Exploit that argument @name is nerver null.  Check is_help_option()
>>>first, because that's what we do elsewhere.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>>---
>>> vl.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
>>>index 6a31e5bfac..da1af3e10d 100644
>>>--- a/vl.c
>>>+++ b/vl.c
>>>@@ -2573,19 +2573,10 @@ static gint machine_class_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
>>> 
>>> static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>>> {
>>>-    MachineClass *mc = NULL;
>>>+    MachineClass *mc;
>>>     GSList *el;
>>> 
>>>-    if (name) {
>>>-        mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>>>-    }
>>>-    if (mc) {
>>>-        return mc;
>>>-    }
>>>-    if (name && !is_help_option(name)) {
>>>-        error_report("unsupported machine type");
>>>-        error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>>>-    } else {
>>>+    if (is_help_option(name)) {
>>>         printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>>>         machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>>>         for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>>>@@ -2597,9 +2588,16 @@ static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>>>                    mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>>>                    mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>>>         }
>>>+        exit(0);
>>>     }
>>>-
>>>-    exit(!name || !is_help_option(name));
>>>+        
>>>+    mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>>>+    if (!mc) {
>>>+        error_report("unsupported machine type");
>>>+        error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>>>+        exit(1);
>>>+    }
>>>+    return mc;
>>
>> This change looks changed the original behavior.
>>
>> In original logic, if mc is not NULL, there is no message printed. While now
>> it rely on is_help_option(). And no it exit when !is_help_option(), while
>> before this change it exit when is_help_option().
>>
>> I don't understand the reason behind this. My suggestion is you may split this
>> patch into two:
>>
>>   1. remove check on name
>>   2. refine the logic with explanations.
>
>Cases:
>
>(1) User asks for help, i.e. is_help_option(name)
>
>(1a) and no machine named @name exists, i.e.
>     is_help_option(name) && !find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(1b) and a machine named @name exists
>     is_help_option(name) && find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(2) User asks for a machine that doesn't exist, i.e.
>    !is_help_option(name) && !find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(3) User asks for a machine that exists, i.e.
>    !is_help_option(name) && find_machine(name, machines)
>
>Since no machines are called "help" or "?", case (1b) is not actually
>possible.
>
>Old code:
>
>    static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>    {
>        MachineClass *mc = NULL;
>        GSList *el;
>
>        if (name) {
>            mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>        }
>        if (mc) {
>            return mc;
>        }
>        if (name && !is_help_option(name)) {
>            error_report("unsupported machine type");
>            error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>        } else {
>            printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>            machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>            for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>                MachineClass *mc = el->data;
>                if (mc->alias) {
>                    printf("%-20s %s (alias of %s)\n", mc->alias, mc->desc, mc->name);
>                }
>                printf("%-20s %s%s%s\n", mc->name, mc->desc,
>                       mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>                       mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>            }
>        }
>
>        exit(!name || !is_help_option(name));
>    }
>
>Case (1a): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (1b): return find_machine()
>
>Case (2): report error, exit(1)
>
>Case (3): return find_machine()
>
>New code:
>
>    static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>    {
>        MachineClass *mc;
>        GSList *el;
>
>        if (is_help_option(name)) {
>            printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>            machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>            for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>                MachineClass *mc = el->data;
>                if (mc->alias) {
>                    printf("%-20s %s (alias of %s)\n", mc->alias, mc->desc, mc->name);
>                }
>                printf("%-20s %s%s%s\n", mc->name, mc->desc,
>                       mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>                       mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>            }
>            exit(0);
>        }
>
>        mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>        if (!mc) {
>            error_report("unsupported machine type");
>            error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>            exit(1);
>        }
>        return mc;
>    }
>
>Case (1a): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (1b): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (2): report error, exit(1)
>
>Case (3): return find_machine()
>
>The patch changes "impossible" case (1b).  That's intentional (but my
>commit message could explain it better).

This looks better. Would you mind refine it so that I could send all these
patches in v2.

Or you prefer send it out by our self?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] vl: Simplify machine_parse()
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 07:15:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404231526.GA17148@richard> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190404231526.k28iSUB_vW1qls0gTrcOQQXj71WCJRX2_zzkmRoImTY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875zrt69iy.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:26:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>Exploit that argument @name is nerver null.  Check is_help_option()
>>>first, because that's what we do elsewhere.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>>---
>>> vl.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
>>>index 6a31e5bfac..da1af3e10d 100644
>>>--- a/vl.c
>>>+++ b/vl.c
>>>@@ -2573,19 +2573,10 @@ static gint machine_class_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
>>> 
>>> static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>>> {
>>>-    MachineClass *mc = NULL;
>>>+    MachineClass *mc;
>>>     GSList *el;
>>> 
>>>-    if (name) {
>>>-        mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>>>-    }
>>>-    if (mc) {
>>>-        return mc;
>>>-    }
>>>-    if (name && !is_help_option(name)) {
>>>-        error_report("unsupported machine type");
>>>-        error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>>>-    } else {
>>>+    if (is_help_option(name)) {
>>>         printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>>>         machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>>>         for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>>>@@ -2597,9 +2588,16 @@ static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>>>                    mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>>>                    mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>>>         }
>>>+        exit(0);
>>>     }
>>>-
>>>-    exit(!name || !is_help_option(name));
>>>+        
>>>+    mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>>>+    if (!mc) {
>>>+        error_report("unsupported machine type");
>>>+        error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>>>+        exit(1);
>>>+    }
>>>+    return mc;
>>
>> This change looks changed the original behavior.
>>
>> In original logic, if mc is not NULL, there is no message printed. While now
>> it rely on is_help_option(). And no it exit when !is_help_option(), while
>> before this change it exit when is_help_option().
>>
>> I don't understand the reason behind this. My suggestion is you may split this
>> patch into two:
>>
>>   1. remove check on name
>>   2. refine the logic with explanations.
>
>Cases:
>
>(1) User asks for help, i.e. is_help_option(name)
>
>(1a) and no machine named @name exists, i.e.
>     is_help_option(name) && !find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(1b) and a machine named @name exists
>     is_help_option(name) && find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(2) User asks for a machine that doesn't exist, i.e.
>    !is_help_option(name) && !find_machine(name, machines)
>
>(3) User asks for a machine that exists, i.e.
>    !is_help_option(name) && find_machine(name, machines)
>
>Since no machines are called "help" or "?", case (1b) is not actually
>possible.
>
>Old code:
>
>    static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>    {
>        MachineClass *mc = NULL;
>        GSList *el;
>
>        if (name) {
>            mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>        }
>        if (mc) {
>            return mc;
>        }
>        if (name && !is_help_option(name)) {
>            error_report("unsupported machine type");
>            error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>        } else {
>            printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>            machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>            for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>                MachineClass *mc = el->data;
>                if (mc->alias) {
>                    printf("%-20s %s (alias of %s)\n", mc->alias, mc->desc, mc->name);
>                }
>                printf("%-20s %s%s%s\n", mc->name, mc->desc,
>                       mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>                       mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>            }
>        }
>
>        exit(!name || !is_help_option(name));
>    }
>
>Case (1a): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (1b): return find_machine()
>
>Case (2): report error, exit(1)
>
>Case (3): return find_machine()
>
>New code:
>
>    static MachineClass *machine_parse(const char *name, GSList *machines)
>    {
>        MachineClass *mc;
>        GSList *el;
>
>        if (is_help_option(name)) {
>            printf("Supported machines are:\n");
>            machines = g_slist_sort(machines, machine_class_cmp);
>            for (el = machines; el; el = el->next) {
>                MachineClass *mc = el->data;
>                if (mc->alias) {
>                    printf("%-20s %s (alias of %s)\n", mc->alias, mc->desc, mc->name);
>                }
>                printf("%-20s %s%s%s\n", mc->name, mc->desc,
>                       mc->is_default ? " (default)" : "",
>                       mc->deprecation_reason ? " (deprecated)" : "");
>            }
>            exit(0);
>        }
>
>        mc = find_machine(name, machines);
>        if (!mc) {
>            error_report("unsupported machine type");
>            error_printf("Use -machine help to list supported machines\n");
>            exit(1);
>        }
>        return mc;
>    }
>
>Case (1a): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (1b): print help, exit(0)
>
>Case (2): report error, exit(1)
>
>Case (3): return find_machine()
>
>The patch changes "impossible" case (1b).  That's intentional (but my
>commit message could explain it better).

This looks better. Would you mind refine it so that I could send all these
patches in v2.

Or you prefer send it out by our self?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11  6:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] cleanup select_machine Wei Yang
2019-03-11  6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vl.c: make find_default_machine() local Wei Yang
2019-04-02  6:33   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-02 15:07     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-02 15:17       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-11  6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vl.c: allocate TYPE_MACHINE list once during bootup Wei Yang
2019-04-02 13:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-02 15:16     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-02 16:10       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-03  0:49         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-03  6:15           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-02 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] vl: Clean up after previous commit Markus Armbruster
2019-04-03 22:10   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-04 15:49     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-02 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] vl: Simplify machine_parse() Markus Armbruster
2019-04-03 22:32   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-04 16:05     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-04 23:15       ` Wei Yang [this message]
2019-04-04 23:15         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-05  5:39         ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190404231526.GA17148@richard \
    --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.