* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id
@ 2019-05-08 5:23 Li Wang
2019-05-08 15:04 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-14 14:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2019-05-08 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
For some ppc64le systems, it has non-continuous numa nodes in
hardware configuration. So we're hitting the below warnings while
running set_mempolicy tests on that. To fix this issue, let's just
remove restrictions on numa node-id in get_mempolicy().
Error Log
---------
tst_test.c:1096: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 50m 00s
tst_numa.c:190: INFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
set_mempolicy01.c:63: PASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) node 0
tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 0 allocated 16 pages
tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 8 allocated 0 pages
set_mempolicy01.c:82: PASS: child: Node 0 allocated 16
set_mempolicy01.c:63: PASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) node 8
tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
...
tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 0 allocated 0 pages
tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 8 allocated 0 pages
set_mempolicy01.c:86: FAIL: child: Node 8 allocated 0, expected 16
lscpu
-----
Architecture: ppc64le
...
CPU(s): 128
Core(s) per socket: 16
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 2
Model name: POWER9, altivec supported
...
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-63
NUMA node8 CPU(s): 64-127
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
---
libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c b/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
index 0ba6daf39..56c8640ff 100644
--- a/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
+++ b/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
@@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ void tst_nodemap_count_pages(struct tst_nodemap *nodes,
if (ret < 0)
tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "get_mempolicy() failed");
- if (node < 0 || (unsigned int)node >= nodes->cnt) {
- tst_res(TWARN, "get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node %i\n", node);
+ if (node < 0) {
+ tst_res(TWARN,
+ "get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node %i\n", node);
continue;
}
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id
2019-05-08 5:23 [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id Li Wang
@ 2019-05-08 15:04 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-14 14:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2019-05-08 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
----- Original Message -----
> For some ppc64le systems, it has non-continuous numa nodes in
> hardware configuration. So we're hitting the below warnings while
> running set_mempolicy tests on that. To fix this issue, let's just
> remove restrictions on numa node-id in get_mempolicy().
>
> Error Log
> ---------
> tst_test.c:1096: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 50m 00s
> tst_numa.c:190: INFO: Found 2 NUMA memory nodes
> set_mempolicy01.c:63: PASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) node 0
> tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 0 allocated 16 pages
> tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 8 allocated 0 pages
> set_mempolicy01.c:82: PASS: child: Node 0 allocated 16
> set_mempolicy01.c:63: PASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND) node 8
> tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
> tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
> tst_numa.c:92: WARN: get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node 8
> ...
> tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 0 allocated 0 pages
> tst_numa.c:26: INFO: Node 8 allocated 0 pages
> set_mempolicy01.c:86: FAIL: child: Node 8 allocated 0, expected 16
>
> lscpu
> -----
> Architecture: ppc64le
> ...
> CPU(s): 128
> Core(s) per socket: 16
> Socket(s): 2
> NUMA node(s): 2
> Model name: POWER9, altivec supported
> ...
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-63
> NUMA node8 CPU(s): 64-127
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
> libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c b/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
> index 0ba6daf39..56c8640ff 100644
> --- a/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
> +++ b/libs/libltpnuma/tst_numa.c
> @@ -88,8 +88,9 @@ void tst_nodemap_count_pages(struct tst_nodemap *nodes,
> if (ret < 0)
> tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "get_mempolicy() failed");
>
> - if (node < 0 || (unsigned int)node >= nodes->cnt) {
> - tst_res(TWARN, "get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node %i\n", node);
> + if (node < 0) {
> + tst_res(TWARN,
> + "get_mempolicy(...) returned invalid node %i\n", node);
> continue;
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
2/2 looks good to me:
Acked-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id
2019-05-08 5:23 [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id Li Wang
2019-05-08 15:04 ` Jan Stancek
@ 2019-05-14 14:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2019-05-14 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi!
This is obviously OK, applied, thanks for the fix.
I guess that later on we may replace the check by storing the maximal
numa node to the numa mapping structure and check that the id is <= than
the max node.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-14 14:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-08 5:23 [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] libltpnuma: remove restrictions on numa node-id Li Wang
2019-05-08 15:04 ` Jan Stancek
2019-05-14 14:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.