All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"marex@denx.de" <marex@denx.de>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] USB: use genalloc for USB HCs with local memory
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:42:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515124250.GA13754@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4fc0151-5e49-77fd-7736-37cdfe57c268@nxp.com>

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:57:12AM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Glad I could help. On the remoteproc_virtio.c case, I had a cursory look 
> and found out that the dma_declare_coherent_memory() usage was 
> introduced quite recently, by this patch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=086d08725d34c6b3333db710344ae9c4fdafb2d5

Yes.  I took a look at it to, and while it isn't exactly a clean
usage of the API it at least declares system memory and not a resource.
So it doesn't really affect our plan.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-15 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-14 14:38 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-14 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] USB: use genalloc for USB HCs with local memory laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-14 14:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-15  9:57     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-15 12:42       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-05-14 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] usb: host: ohci-sm501: init genalloc for " laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-14 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] usb: host: ohci-tmio: " laurentiu.tudor
2019-05-14 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework Robin Murphy
2019-05-14 18:29   ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-15 10:37     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-15 16:28       ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-16  9:35         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-16 13:47           ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-16 11:49         ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-16 15:15           ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-17 10:52             ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-17 17:41               ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-20 11:34                 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2019-05-20 15:41                   ` Fredrik Noring
2019-05-21 10:32                     ` hch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190515124250.GA13754@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.