All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 23:39:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520213945.17046-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520213945.17046-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We need to make sure implementations don't cheat and don't have a
possible schedule/blocking point deeply burried where review can't
catch it.

I'm not sure whether this is the best way to make sure all the
might_sleep() callsites trigger, and it's a bit ugly in the code flow.
But it gets the job done.

Inspired by an i915 patch series which did exactly that, because the
rules haven't been entirely clear to us.

v2: Use the shiny new non_block_start/end annotations instead of
abusing preempt_disable/enable.

v3: Rebase on top of Glisse's arg rework.

v4: Rebase on top of more Glisse rework.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index c05e406a7cd7..a09e737711d5 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -176,7 +176,13 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 	id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, &range->mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
 		if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_start) {
-			int _ret = mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, range);
+			int _ret;
+
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_start();
+			_ret = mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, range);
+			if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+				non_block_end();
 			if (_ret) {
 				pr_info("%pS callback failed with %d in %sblockable context.\n",
 					mn->ops->invalidate_range_start, _ret,
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-20 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20 21:39 [PATCH 1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end() Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 14:47   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 14:47     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-05-21 15:32   ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Jerome Glisse
2019-05-20 21:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 15:40   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-05-21 16:00     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 16:32       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-05-20 21:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Patchwork
2019-05-21 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Jerome Glisse
2019-06-18 15:22   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-18 15:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 16:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 19:57       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 20:13         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 20:18           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 20:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 21:20               ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 17:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-21 18:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-22 12:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-10 10:36 [PATCH 0/4] mmu notifier debug checks v2 Daniel Vetter
2018-12-10 10:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190520213945.17046-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.