All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 11:44:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521154411.GD3836@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520213945.17046-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:39:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
> 
> Inspired by some confusion we had discussing i915 mmu notifiers and
> whether we could use the newly-introduced return value to handle some
> corner cases. Until we realized that these are only for when a task
> has been killed by the oom reaper.
> 
> An alternative approach would be to split the callback into two
> versions, one with the int return value, and the other with void
> return value like in older kernels. But that's a lot more churn for
> fairly little gain I think.
> 
> Summary from the m-l discussion on why we want something at warning
> level: This allows automated tooling in CI to catch bugs without
> humans having to look at everything. If we just upgrade the existing
> pr_info to a pr_warn, then we'll have false positives. And as-is, no
> one will ever spot the problem since it's lost in the massive amounts
> of overall dmesg noise.
> 
> v2: Drop the full WARN_ON backtrace in favour of just a pr_warn for
> the problematic case (Michal Hocko).
> 
> v3: Rebase on top of Glisse's arg rework.
> 
> v4: More rebase on top of Glisse reworking everything.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

> ---
>  mm/mmu_notifier.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> index ee36068077b6..c05e406a7cd7 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,9 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
>  				pr_info("%pS callback failed with %d in %sblockable context.\n",
>  					mn->ops->invalidate_range_start, _ret,
>  					!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range) ? "non-" : "");
> +				if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
> +					pr_warn("%pS callback failure not allowed\n",
> +						mn->ops->invalidate_range_start);
>  				ret = _ret;
>  			}
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20 21:39 [PATCH 1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end() Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 14:47   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 14:47     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-20 21:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 15:32   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-05-20 21:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 15:40   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-05-21 16:00     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 16:32       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-05-20 21:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Patchwork
2019-05-21 15:44 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2019-06-18 15:22   ` [PATCH 1/4] " Daniel Vetter
2019-06-18 15:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 16:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 19:57       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 20:13         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 20:18           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-19 20:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-19 21:20               ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-21 17:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-21 18:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-22 12:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-10 10:36 [PATCH 0/4] mmu notifier debug checks v2 Daniel Vetter
2018-12-10 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2018-12-10 10:36   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-10 10:44   ` Koenig, Christian
2018-12-10 10:44     ` Koenig, Christian
2018-12-10 13:27   ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-10 13:27     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521154411.GD3836@redhat.com \
    --to=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.