All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:55:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522085505.GY8268@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6e0efaa-162c-e606-54e9-cfe74b228bf4@arm.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:46:28PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 05/21/2019 04:52 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > ARMv8 provides support for chained PMU counters, where an event type
> > of 0x001E is set for odd-numbered counters, the event counter will
> > increment by one for each overflow of the preceding even-numbered
> > counter. Let's emulate this in KVM by creating a 64 bit perf counter
> > when a user chains two emulated counters together.
> > 
> > For chained events we only support generating an overflow interrupt
> > on the high counter. We use the attributes of the low counter to
> > determine the attributes of the perf event.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |   2 +
> >  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > index b73f31baca52..8b434745500a 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  
> >  #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX		(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
> > +#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS	((ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS + 1) >> 1)
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> >  
> > @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ struct kvm_pmc {
> >  struct kvm_pmu {
> >  	int irq_num;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  	bool ready;
> >  	bool created;
> >  	bool irq_level;
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > index ae1e886d4a1a..4b0981c402c6 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > @@ -25,28 +25,128 @@
> >  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> >  
> >  static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> > +
> > +#define PERF_ATTR_CFG1_KVM_PMU_CHAINED 0x1
> > +
> > +static struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch;
> > +
> > +	pmc -= pmc->idx;
> > +	pmu = container_of(pmc, struct kvm_pmu, pmc[0]);
> > +	vcpu_arch = container_of(pmu, struct kvm_vcpu_arch, pmu);
> > +	return container_of(vcpu_arch, struct kvm_vcpu, arch);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> > - * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained - determine if the pmc is chained
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
> > +
> > +	return test_bit(pmc->idx >> 1, vcpu->arch.pmu.chained);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter - determine if select_idx is a high/low counter
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	return select_idx & 0x1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc - obtain the canonical pmc
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + *
> > + * When a pair of PMCs are chained together we use the low counter (canonical)
> > + * to hold the underlying perf event.
> > + */
> > +static struct kvm_pmc *kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(pmc->idx))
> > +		return pmc - 1;
> > +
> > +	return pmc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype - determine if the event type is chain
> >   * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> >   * @select_idx: The counter index
> >   */
> > -u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> > -	u64 counter, reg, enabled, running;
> > -	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > -	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +	u64 eventsel, reg;
> >  
> > -	reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > -	      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > -	counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	select_idx |= 0x1;
> > +
> > +	if (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	reg = PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > +	eventsel = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT;
> > +
> > +	return armv8pmu_evtype_is_chain(eventsel);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static u64 kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > +					  struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	u64 counter, counter_high, reg, enabled, running;
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +		counter_high = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1);
> > +
> > +		counter = lower_32_bits(counter) | (counter_high << 32);
> > +	} else {
> > +		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	/* The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> >  	 * the value perf event counts.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (pmc->perf_event)
> >  		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event, &enabled,
> >  						 &running);
> >  
> > +	return counter;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	u64 counter;
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +
> > +	counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(select_idx))
> > +		counter >>= 32;
> > +
> >  	return counter & pmc->bitmask;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -74,6 +174,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> >   */
> >  static void kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> > +	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> >  	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> >  		perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> >  		perf_event_release_kernel(pmc->perf_event);
> > @@ -91,13 +192,24 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> >  	u64 counter, reg;
> >  
> > -	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> > +	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +	if (!pmc->perf_event)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> > +
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter & pmc->bitmask;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1) = (counter >> 32) & pmc->bitmask;
> > +	} else {
> >  		counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> >  		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> >  		       ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> >  		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter;
> > -		kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -115,6 +227,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].bitmask = 0xffffffffUL;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.pmu.chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -154,6 +268,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  	int i;
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event;
> >  
> >  	if (!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -163,9 +278,21 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute set.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> 
> But pmc is already a canonical pmc, we don't need to call
> kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(). The condition above is the same as the one
> use in kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(), so no "non canonical" pmc ever
> reaches that point. I would understand putting a comment to clarify that
> fact.

Yes you're completely right. Thanks for spotting this unnecessary code.

> 
> >  		if (pmc->perf_event) {
> >  			perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> > -			if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> > +			if (perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> 
> You forgot to set perf_event.

Yes this should have been pmc->perf_event - thanks.

> 
> >  				kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -192,6 +319,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute unset.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> 
> Same as the enable case, we know pmc is already canonical, no need to
> call the function.
> 

Thanks for the good review as always.

Andrew Murray

> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Julien Thierry
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 09:55:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522085505.GY8268@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6e0efaa-162c-e606-54e9-cfe74b228bf4@arm.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:46:28PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 05/21/2019 04:52 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > ARMv8 provides support for chained PMU counters, where an event type
> > of 0x001E is set for odd-numbered counters, the event counter will
> > increment by one for each overflow of the preceding even-numbered
> > counter. Let's emulate this in KVM by creating a 64 bit perf counter
> > when a user chains two emulated counters together.
> > 
> > For chained events we only support generating an overflow interrupt
> > on the high counter. We use the attributes of the low counter to
> > determine the attributes of the perf event.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |   2 +
> >  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > index b73f31baca52..8b434745500a 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  
> >  #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX		(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
> > +#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS	((ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS + 1) >> 1)
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> >  
> > @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ struct kvm_pmc {
> >  struct kvm_pmu {
> >  	int irq_num;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  	bool ready;
> >  	bool created;
> >  	bool irq_level;
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > index ae1e886d4a1a..4b0981c402c6 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > @@ -25,28 +25,128 @@
> >  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> >  
> >  static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> > +
> > +#define PERF_ATTR_CFG1_KVM_PMU_CHAINED 0x1
> > +
> > +static struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch;
> > +
> > +	pmc -= pmc->idx;
> > +	pmu = container_of(pmc, struct kvm_pmu, pmc[0]);
> > +	vcpu_arch = container_of(pmu, struct kvm_vcpu_arch, pmu);
> > +	return container_of(vcpu_arch, struct kvm_vcpu, arch);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> > - * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained - determine if the pmc is chained
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
> > +
> > +	return test_bit(pmc->idx >> 1, vcpu->arch.pmu.chained);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter - determine if select_idx is a high/low counter
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	return select_idx & 0x1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc - obtain the canonical pmc
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + *
> > + * When a pair of PMCs are chained together we use the low counter (canonical)
> > + * to hold the underlying perf event.
> > + */
> > +static struct kvm_pmc *kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(pmc->idx))
> > +		return pmc - 1;
> > +
> > +	return pmc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype - determine if the event type is chain
> >   * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> >   * @select_idx: The counter index
> >   */
> > -u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> > -	u64 counter, reg, enabled, running;
> > -	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > -	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +	u64 eventsel, reg;
> >  
> > -	reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > -	      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > -	counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	select_idx |= 0x1;
> > +
> > +	if (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	reg = PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > +	eventsel = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT;
> > +
> > +	return armv8pmu_evtype_is_chain(eventsel);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static u64 kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > +					  struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	u64 counter, counter_high, reg, enabled, running;
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +		counter_high = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1);
> > +
> > +		counter = lower_32_bits(counter) | (counter_high << 32);
> > +	} else {
> > +		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	/* The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> >  	 * the value perf event counts.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (pmc->perf_event)
> >  		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event, &enabled,
> >  						 &running);
> >  
> > +	return counter;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	u64 counter;
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +
> > +	counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(select_idx))
> > +		counter >>= 32;
> > +
> >  	return counter & pmc->bitmask;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -74,6 +174,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> >   */
> >  static void kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> > +	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> >  	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> >  		perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> >  		perf_event_release_kernel(pmc->perf_event);
> > @@ -91,13 +192,24 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> >  	u64 counter, reg;
> >  
> > -	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> > +	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +	if (!pmc->perf_event)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> > +
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter & pmc->bitmask;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1) = (counter >> 32) & pmc->bitmask;
> > +	} else {
> >  		counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> >  		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> >  		       ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> >  		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter;
> > -		kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -115,6 +227,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].bitmask = 0xffffffffUL;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.pmu.chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -154,6 +268,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  	int i;
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event;
> >  
> >  	if (!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -163,9 +278,21 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute set.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> 
> But pmc is already a canonical pmc, we don't need to call
> kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(). The condition above is the same as the one
> use in kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(), so no "non canonical" pmc ever
> reaches that point. I would understand putting a comment to clarify that
> fact.

Yes you're completely right. Thanks for spotting this unnecessary code.

> 
> >  		if (pmc->perf_event) {
> >  			perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> > -			if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> > +			if (perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> 
> You forgot to set perf_event.

Yes this should have been pmc->perf_event - thanks.

> 
> >  				kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -192,6 +319,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute unset.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> 
> Same as the enable case, we know pmc is already canonical, no need to
> call the function.
> 

Thanks for the good review as always.

Andrew Murray

> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Julien Thierry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-22  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21 15:52 [PATCH v7 0/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add support for chained counters Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52 ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: rename kvm_pmu_{enable/disable}_counter functions Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52   ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: extract duplicated code to own function Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52   ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52   ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] arm64: perf: extract chain helper into header Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52   ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 16:15   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-05-21 16:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-05-21 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 15:52   ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 16:31   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-21 16:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-22 10:35     ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-22 10:35       ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-22 11:50       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-22 11:50         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-22 13:48         ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-22 13:48           ` Andrew Murray
2019-05-21 16:46   ` Julien Thierry
2019-05-21 16:46     ` Julien Thierry
2019-05-22  8:55     ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-05-22  8:55       ` Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190522085505.GY8268@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.