All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: yangbo.lu@nxp.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	alexandru.marginean@nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2, 0/4] ENETC: support hardware timestamping
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:16:50 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524.131650.1001639096871571503.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523023451.2933-1-yangbo.lu@nxp.com>

From: "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 02:33:24 +0000

> This patch-set is to support hardware timestamping for ENETC
> and also to add ENETC 1588 timer device tree node for ls1028a.
> 
> Because the ENETC RX BD ring dynamic allocation has not been
> supported and it is too expensive to use extended RX BDs
> if timestamping is not used, a Kconfig option is used to
> enable extended RX BDs in order to support hardware
> timestamping. This option will be removed once RX BD
> ring dynamic allocation is implemented.

Series applied.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: yangbo.lu@nxp.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, alexandru.marginean@nxp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2, 0/4] ENETC: support hardware timestamping
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:16:50 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524.131650.1001639096871571503.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523023451.2933-1-yangbo.lu@nxp.com>

From: "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 02:33:24 +0000

> This patch-set is to support hardware timestamping for ENETC
> and also to add ENETC 1588 timer device tree node for ls1028a.
> 
> Because the ENETC RX BD ring dynamic allocation has not been
> supported and it is too expensive to use extended RX BDs
> if timestamping is not used, a Kconfig option is used to
> enable extended RX BDs in order to support hardware
> timestamping. This option will be removed once RX BD
> ring dynamic allocation is implemented.

Series applied.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-24 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23  2:33 [PATCH net-next v2, 0/4] ENETC: support hardware timestamping Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2, 1/4] enetc: add hardware timestamping support Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2, 2/4] enetc: add get_ts_info interface for ethtool Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2, 3/4] dt-binding: ptp_qoriq: support ENETC PTP compatible Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2, 4/4] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: add ENETC 1588 timer node Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23  2:33   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-23 13:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2, 0/4] ENETC: support hardware timestamping Richard Cochran
2019-05-23 13:48   ` Richard Cochran
2019-05-23 13:48   ` Richard Cochran
2019-05-24  2:20   ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-24  2:20     ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-24  2:20     ` Y.b. Lu
2019-05-24 20:16 ` David Miller [this message]
2019-05-24 20:16   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190524.131650.1001639096871571503.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.