[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mender: bump version to 2.0.0

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mender: bump version to 2.0.0

[Raul Hidalgo Caballero]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20190527/4d999490/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-package-mender-bump-version-to-2.0.0.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20190527/4d999490/attachment.bin>

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mender: bump version to 2.0.0

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Raul,

On Mon, 27 May 2019 10:00:25 +0200
Raul Hidalgo Caballero <deinok@deinok.com> wrote:

> 

Here as well, please send with git send-email. But in addition, I'd
like to mention we already had a patch bumping mender to 2.0.0 from
Adam Duskett, but it had some minor issues. I'm sure Adam will send a
new iteration of it soon.

Your patch is probably incorrect, because you bump to 2.0.0 without
updating the hash of the license files, while they apparently changed
between 1.7.0 and 2.0.0, so your patch most likely breaks "make
legal-info".

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/mender: bump version to 2.0.0

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Raul,

Please keep the Buildroot mailing list in Cc (i.e use "Reply All"
instead of "Reply"), and also you should prefer bottom-posting instead
of top-posting.

On Mon, 27 May 2019 14:43:58 +0200
Raul Hidalgo Caballero <deinok@deinok.com> wrote:

> Okey, I will wait for Adam.
> Also, what kind of new issues does it have?

Are you asking about the issues caused by your patch, or Adam's patch ?

In Adam's patch, the only minor issue is that he was changing the hash
of the different license files (which is correct since they changed in
Mender 2.0.0), but he didn't explain what the license changes were in
the commit log.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com