All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
	Serge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@intel.com>,
	Shay Katz-zamir <shay.katz-zamir@intel.com>,
	Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Svahn <kai.svahn@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	Philip Tricca <philip.b.tricca@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:15:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604111533.GA15393@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531233159.30992-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 04:31:50PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This series is the result of a rather absurd amount of discussion over
> how to get SGX to play nice with LSM policies, without having to resort
> to evil shenanigans or put undue burden on userspace.  The discussion
> definitely wandered into completely insane territory at times, but I
> think/hope we ended up with something reasonable.

By definition this is a broken series because it does not apply to
mainline. Even RFC series should at least apply. Would be better idea to
discuss design ideas and use snippets instead. Now you have to take
original v20 and apply to these patches to evaluate anything.

> The basic gist of the approach is to require userspace to declare what
> protections are maximally allowed for any given page, e.g. add a flags
> field for loading enclave pages that takes ALLOW_{READ,WRITE,EXEC}.  LSMs
> can then adjust the allowed protections, e.g. clear ALLOW_EXEC to prevent
> ever mapping the page with PROT_EXEC.  SGX enforces the allowed perms
> via a new mprotect() vm_ops hook, e.g. like regular mprotect() uses
> MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC}.

mprotect() does not use MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC} constants. It uses
VM_MAY{READ,WRITE,EXEC,SHARED} constants.

What are ALLOW_{READ,WRITE,EXEC} and how they are used? What does the
hook do and why it is in vm_ops and not in file_operations? Are they
arguments to the ioctl or internal variables that are set based on
SECINFO?

/Jarkko

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31 23:31 [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] x86/sgx: Remove unused local variable in sgx_encl_release() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 22:10       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-05 14:08         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-05 15:17         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-05 20:14           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-06 15:37             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-13 13:48               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-13 16:47                 ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-13 17:14                   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 15:18                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-05 15:15       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] x86/sgx: Allow userspace to add multiple pages in single ioctl() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:26   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 20:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 20:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 23:45         ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  0:54           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 20:18         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 22:02           ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 20:14   ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-03 20:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 20:39       ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-03 23:48       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  0:55         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:55   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mm: Introduce vm_ops->mprotect() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:27   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 12:24   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 14:51   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] x86/sgx: Restrict mapping without an enclave page to PROT_NONE Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 15:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] x86/sgx: Require userspace to provide allowed prots to ADD_PAGES Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 16:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 16:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-05 15:06       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:23   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-05 11:10   ` Ayoun, Serge
2019-06-05 23:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] x86/sgx: Enforce noexec filesystem restriction for enclaves Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:29   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 20:26     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 16:25   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:25     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 20:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:54       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-05 15:10       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-06  1:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 14:19   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 14:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 18:38       ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 18:45         ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-04 20:29   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 20:36     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:43       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-06  2:04         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] security/selinux: Add enclave_load() implementation Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 15:01   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 15:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-02  7:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 17:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 18:30     ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  1:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 15:33       ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-04 16:30         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:38         ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 17:47   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 18:02     ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 11:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190604111533.GA15393@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=philip.b.tricca@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.