All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"nhorman@redhat.com" <nhorman@redhat.com>,
	"npmccallum@redhat.com" <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@intel.com>,
	"Katz-zamir, Shay" <shay.katz-zamir@intel.com>,
	"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
	"Tricca, Philip B" <philip.b.tricca@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:18:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614151805.GB11241@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190613171451.GD5850@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:14:51AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > I don't get this. The swapper takes a read lock on mm->mmap_sem, which locks
> > the vma, which in turn reference counts vma->vm_file. Why is the internal
> > refcount still needed? 
> 
> mmap_sem is only held when reclaim is touching PTEs, e.g. to test/clear
> its accessed bit and to zap the PTE.  The liveliness of the enclave needs
> to be guaranteed for the entire duration of reclaim, e.g. we can't have
> the enclave disappearing when we go to do EWB.  It's also worth nothing
> that a single reclaim may operate on more than one mmap_sem, as enclaves
> can be shared across processes (mm_structs).

Anyway, the takeaway I got from this is that encl->refcount does not
need to be updated for VMAs (sent a patch to linux-sgx that I plan
merge).

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31 23:31 [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] x86/sgx: Remove unused local variable in sgx_encl_release() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 22:10       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-05 14:08         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-05 15:17         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-05 20:14           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-06 15:37             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-13 13:48               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-13 16:47                 ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-13 17:14                   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-14 15:18                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-06-05 15:15       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] x86/sgx: Allow userspace to add multiple pages in single ioctl() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:26   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 20:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 20:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 23:45         ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  0:54           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 20:18         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 22:02           ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 20:14   ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-03 20:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 20:39       ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-03 23:48       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  0:55         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 11:55   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mm: Introduce vm_ops->mprotect() Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:27   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 12:24   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 14:51   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] x86/sgx: Restrict mapping without an enclave page to PROT_NONE Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 15:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] x86/sgx: Require userspace to provide allowed prots to ADD_PAGES Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 16:23   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 16:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-05 15:06       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:23   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-05 11:10   ` Ayoun, Serge
2019-06-05 23:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] x86/sgx: Enforce noexec filesystem restriction for enclaves Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:29   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 20:26     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 16:25   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-04 20:25     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 20:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:54       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-05 15:10       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-06-06  1:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03  6:28   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 14:19   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 14:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 18:38       ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 18:45         ` Dave Hansen
2019-06-04 20:29   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-04 20:36     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:43       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-06  2:04         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-05-31 23:31 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] security/selinux: Add enclave_load() implementation Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 15:01   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 15:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-02  7:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 17:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-03 18:30     ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04  1:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 15:33       ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-04 16:30         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-06-04 21:38         ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-03 17:47   ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-03 18:02     ` Xing, Cedric
2019-06-04 11:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614151805.GB11241@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=philip.b.tricca@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.