All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix test_cgroup_storage on s390
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:18:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820141804.88799-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are
dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is
accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on
big-endian machines.

Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores,
simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts.

Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b8d ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test")
Fixes: 919646d2a3a9 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu cgroup storage")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
index 2fc4625c1a15..655729004391 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
 		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 			     BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
-		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 0x1),
-		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
 
 		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), /* map fd */
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			     BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
 		BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
-		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0x1),
 		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-- 
2.21.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20 14:18 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2019-08-21 15:09 ` [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: fix test_cgroup_storage on s390 Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190820141804.88799-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.