All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:44:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190828084416.GC2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190826144740.10163-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 07:47:34AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 1b2c37ed49db..f4d6335a18e2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static inline void intel_pmu_ack_status(u64 ack)
>  
>  static void intel_pmu_disable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
>  {
> -	int idx = hwc->idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
> +	int idx = get_reg_idx(hwc->idx) - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
>  	u64 ctrl_val, mask;
>  
>  	mask = 0xfULL << (idx * 4);
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> +	int reg_idx = get_reg_idx(hwc->idx);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(hwc->idx == INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
>  		intel_pmu_disable_bts();

It is unfortunate we need that in both cases; and note how the
inconsitent naming.

> @@ -2157,9 +2158,16 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> -	cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> -	cpuc->intel_cp_status &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> +	/*
> +	 * When any other topdown events are still enabled,
> +	 * cancel the disabling.
> +	 */
> +	if (has_other_topdown_event(cpuc->active_mask, hwc->idx))
> +		return;

And this includes a 3rd instance of that check :/ Also, this really
wants to be in disable_fixed.

> +
> +	cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
> +	cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
> +	cpuc->intel_cp_status &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL))
>  		intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc);

Same for the enable thing.

Let me clean up this mess for you.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-28  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 14:47 [RESEND PATCH V3 0/8] TopDown metrics support for Icelake kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 1/8] perf/x86/intel: Set correct mask for TOPDOWN.SLOTS kan.liang
2019-08-28  7:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters kan.liang
2019-08-28  7:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28  7:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 13:59     ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28  8:44   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-08-28  9:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28  9:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 13:51       ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28  8:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 3/8] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-08-28 15:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 19:04     ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-31  9:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-09-09 13:40         ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 19:35     ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-28 15:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 16:11     ` [PATCH] x86/math64: Provide a sane mul_u64_u32_div() implementation for x86_64 Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29  9:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-28 16:17     ` [RESEND PATCH V3 3/8] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics Andi Kleen
2019-08-28 16:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29  3:11         ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-29  9:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 13:31     ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-29 13:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-29 16:56         ` Liang, Kan
2019-08-31  9:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-30 23:18   ` Stephane Eranian
2019-08-31  0:31     ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-31  9:13       ` Stephane Eranian
2019-08-31  9:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-31 17:53         ` Andi Kleen
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Support per thread RDPMC " kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Export TopDown events for Icelake kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 6/8] perf/x86/intel: Disable sampling read slots and topdown kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 7/8] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-08-26 14:47 ` [RESEND PATCH V3 8/8] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190828084416.GC2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.