All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: yingwen.chen@intel.com, devel@edk2.groups.io,
	phillip.goerl@oracle.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	jiewen.yao@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
	michael.d.kinney@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, rfc@edk2.groups.io,
	lersek@redhat.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: q35: MCH: add default SMBASE SMRAM lock test
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:07:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917130708.10281-3-imammedo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190917130708.10281-1-imammedo@redhat.com>

test lockable SMRAM at default SMBASE feature introduced by
commit "q35: implement 128K SMRAM at default SMBASE address"

Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
---
 tests/q35-test.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/q35-test.c b/tests/q35-test.c
index a68183d513..dd02660303 100644
--- a/tests/q35-test.c
+++ b/tests/q35-test.c
@@ -186,6 +186,109 @@ static void test_tseg_size(const void *data)
     qtest_quit(qts);
 }
 
+#define SMBASE 0x30000
+#define SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN 0x32
+#define SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN 0x23
+
+static void test_smram_smbase_lock(void)
+{
+    QPCIBus *pcibus;
+    QPCIDevice *pcidev;
+    QDict *response;
+    QTestState *qts;
+    int i;
+
+    qts = qtest_init("-M q35");
+
+    pcibus = qpci_new_pc(qts, NULL);
+    g_assert(pcibus != NULL);
+
+    pcidev = qpci_device_find(pcibus, 0);
+    g_assert(pcidev != NULL);
+
+    /* check that SMRAM is not enabled by default */
+    g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
+    qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+
+    /* check that writinng junk to 0x9c before before negotiating is ignorred */
+    for (i = 0; i < 0xff; i++) {
+        qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
+        g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
+    }
+
+    /* enable SMRAM at SMBASE */
+    qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, 0xff);
+    g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x01);
+    /* lock SMRAM at SMBASE */
+    qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, 0x02);
+    g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x02);
+
+    /* check that SMRAM at SMBASE is locked and can't be unlocked */
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, 0xff);
+    for (i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
+        /* make sure register is immutable */
+        qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
+        g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0x02);
+
+        /* RAM access should go inot black hole */
+        qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+        g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, 0xff);
+    }
+
+    /* reset */
+    response = qtest_qmp(qts, "{'execute': 'system_reset', 'arguments': {} }");
+    g_assert(response);
+    g_assert(!qdict_haskey(response, "error"));
+    qobject_unref(response);
+
+    /* check RAM at SMBASE is available after reset */
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+    g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == 0);
+    qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN);
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_RESET_PATTERN);
+
+    g_free(pcidev);
+    qpci_free_pc(pcibus);
+
+    qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
+static void test_without_smram_base(void)
+{
+    QPCIBus *pcibus;
+    QPCIDevice *pcidev;
+    QTestState *qts;
+    int i;
+
+    qts = qtest_init("-M pc-q35-4.1");
+
+    pcibus = qpci_new_pc(qts, NULL);
+    g_assert(pcibus != NULL);
+
+    pcidev = qpci_device_find(pcibus, 0);
+    g_assert(pcidev != NULL);
+
+    /* check that RAM accessible */
+    qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN);
+
+    /* check that writing to 0x9c succeeds */
+    for (i = 0; i <= 0xff; i++) {
+        qpci_config_writeb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE, i);
+        g_assert(qpci_config_readb(pcidev, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_F_SMBASE) == i);
+    }
+
+    /* check that RAM is still accessible */
+    qtest_writeb(qts, SMBASE, SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN + 1);
+    g_assert_cmpint(qtest_readb(qts, SMBASE), ==, (SMRAM_TEST_PATTERN + 1));
+
+    g_free(pcidev);
+    qpci_free_pc(pcibus);
+
+    qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
     g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
@@ -197,5 +300,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
     qtest_add_data_func("/q35/tseg-size/8mb", &tseg_8mb, test_tseg_size);
     qtest_add_data_func("/q35/tseg-size/ext/16mb", &tseg_ext_16mb,
                         test_tseg_size);
+    qtest_add_func("/q35/smram/smbase_lock", test_smram_smbase_lock);
+    qtest_add_func("/q35/smram/legacy_smbase", test_without_smram_base);
     return g_test_run();
 }
-- 
2.18.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-17 13:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] q35: mch: allow to lock down 128K RAM at default SMBASE address Igor Mammedov
2019-09-17 13:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement 128K SMRAM " Igor Mammedov
2019-09-19 17:02   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-20  8:28     ` [edk2-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2019-09-20  9:28       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-23 18:35         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-24 11:19           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-30 11:51             ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-30 12:36               ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-30 14:22                 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-01 18:03                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-10-04 11:31                     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-07  9:44                       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-24 11:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-17 13:07 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-09-17 15:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/2] q35: mch: allow to lock down 128K RAM " no-reply
2019-09-17 15:24 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190917130708.10281-3-imammedo@redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    --cc=jiewen.yao@intel.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.d.kinney@intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=phillip.goerl@oracle.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rfc@edk2.groups.io \
    --cc=yingwen.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.