All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM Juno r1 + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y => boot failure
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011144233.GA2438@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011134354.GA31516@bogus>

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:43:54PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep
> >
> > On 11.10.2019 15:10, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >> Hi James,
> > >>
> > >> On 11.10.2019 12:38, James Morse wrote:
> > >>> Hi guys,
> > >>>
> > >>> On 11/10/2019 11:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >>>>> Recently I've got access to ARM Juno R1 board and did some tests with
> > >>>>> current mainline kernel on it. I'm a bit surprised that enabling
> > >>>>> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING causes a boot failure on this board. After enabling
> > >>>>> this Kconfig option, I get no single message from the kernel, although I
> > >>>>> have earlycon enabled.
> > >>>> I don't have Juno R1 but I tried defconfig + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and
> > >>>> it boots fine.
> > >>> I just tried this on my r1, v5.4-rc1 with this configuration worked just fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> My cmdline is:
> > >>> | root=/dev/sda6 loglevel=9 earlycon=pl011,0x7ff80000 hugepagesz=2M hugepages=512
> > >>> | crashkernel=1G console=ttyAMA0 resume=/dev/sda2 no_console_suspend efi=debug
> > >>>
> > >> That is a bit strange. Here is a boot log from v5.4-rc1 with pure
> > >> defconfig: https://paste.debian.net/1105851/
> > >>
> > > I see from the boot log that both Image.gz and dtb being loaded at the
> > > same address 0x82000000, will u-boot uncompress it elsewhere after loading
> > > it ? Just for my understanding.
> >
> > tftp downloads Image.gz to 0x82000000, then decompress it to
> > $kernel_addr to save transfer time
> >
> > my bootcmd is:
> >
> > tftp ${fdt_addr} juno/Image.gz; unzip ${fdt_addr} ${kernel_addr}; tftp
> > ${fdt_addr} juno/juno-r1.dtb; booti ${kernel_addr} - ${fdt_addr};
> >

If your ${kernel_addr}=0x80000000 or within first 32MB, then it will override
DTB with the image size I had(35MB). Even if kernel fits 32MB, there is a
chance that .bss lies beyond 32MB and it will be cleared during boot resulting
in DTB corruption(Andre P reminded me this)

Can you try setting $${fdt_addr} to 0x84000000 to begin with ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM Juno r1 + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y => boot failure
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011144233.GA2438@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011134354.GA31516@bogus>

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:43:54PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:15:32PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep
> >
> > On 11.10.2019 15:10, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >> Hi James,
> > >>
> > >> On 11.10.2019 12:38, James Morse wrote:
> > >>> Hi guys,
> > >>>
> > >>> On 11/10/2019 11:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > >>>>> Recently I've got access to ARM Juno R1 board and did some tests with
> > >>>>> current mainline kernel on it. I'm a bit surprised that enabling
> > >>>>> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING causes a boot failure on this board. After enabling
> > >>>>> this Kconfig option, I get no single message from the kernel, although I
> > >>>>> have earlycon enabled.
> > >>>> I don't have Juno R1 but I tried defconfig + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and
> > >>>> it boots fine.
> > >>> I just tried this on my r1, v5.4-rc1 with this configuration worked just fine.
> > >>>
> > >>> My cmdline is:
> > >>> | root=/dev/sda6 loglevel=9 earlycon=pl011,0x7ff80000 hugepagesz=2M hugepages=512
> > >>> | crashkernel=1G console=ttyAMA0 resume=/dev/sda2 no_console_suspend efi=debug
> > >>>
> > >> That is a bit strange. Here is a boot log from v5.4-rc1 with pure
> > >> defconfig: https://paste.debian.net/1105851/
> > >>
> > > I see from the boot log that both Image.gz and dtb being loaded at the
> > > same address 0x82000000, will u-boot uncompress it elsewhere after loading
> > > it ? Just for my understanding.
> >
> > tftp downloads Image.gz to 0x82000000, then decompress it to
> > $kernel_addr to save transfer time
> >
> > my bootcmd is:
> >
> > tftp ${fdt_addr} juno/Image.gz; unzip ${fdt_addr} ${kernel_addr}; tftp
> > ${fdt_addr} juno/juno-r1.dtb; booti ${kernel_addr} - ${fdt_addr};
> >

If your ${kernel_addr}=0x80000000 or within first 32MB, then it will override
DTB with the image size I had(35MB). Even if kernel fits 32MB, there is a
chance that .bss lies beyond 32MB and it will be cleared during boot resulting
in DTB corruption(Andre P reminded me this)

Can you try setting $${fdt_addr} to 0x84000000 to begin with ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20191011092604eucas1p1ca11ab9c4c7508776914b0eb4f35e69b@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-10-11  9:26 ` ARM Juno r1 + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y => boot failure Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 10:05   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 10:05     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 10:21     ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 10:21       ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 10:38     ` James Morse
2019-10-11 10:38       ` James Morse
2019-10-11 10:59       ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 10:59         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 13:02       ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:02         ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:10         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 13:10           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 13:15           ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:15             ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-11 13:43             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 13:43               ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-11 14:42               ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-10-11 14:42                 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-14  9:02                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-14  9:02                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-10-14 10:16                   ` James Morse
2019-10-14 10:16                     ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191011144233.GA2438@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.