All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-20 13:17 Changbin Du
  2019-10-20 18:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-20 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-crypto,
	linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga, linux-usb,
	dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox, jani.nikula,
	Thomas Zimmermann, Changbin Du

The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
all documentation are updated.

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>

---
v2:
  o use 'identifiers' as the new directive name.
---
 Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++------------
 Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py      | 19 ++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
index 192c36af39e2..fff6604631ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
@@ -476,6 +476,22 @@ internal: *[source-pattern ...]*
     .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c
        :internal:
 
+identifiers: *[ function/type ...]*
+  Include documentation for each *function* and *type* in *source*.
+  If no *function* is specified, the documentation for all functions
+  and types in the *source* will be included.
+
+  Examples::
+
+    .. kernel-doc:: lib/bitmap.c
+       :identifiers: bitmap_parselist bitmap_parselist_user
+
+    .. kernel-doc:: lib/idr.c
+       :identifiers:
+
+functions: *[ function/type ...]*
+  This is an alias of the 'identifiers' directive and deprecated.
+
 doc: *title*
   Include documentation for the ``DOC:`` paragraph identified by *title* in
   *source*. Spaces are allowed in *title*; do not quote the *title*. The *title*
@@ -488,19 +504,6 @@ doc: *title*
     .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_audio.c
        :doc: High Definition Audio over HDMI and Display Port
 
-functions: *[ function ...]*
-  Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
-  If no *function* is specified, the documentation for all functions
-  and types in the *source* will be included.
-
-  Examples::
-
-    .. kernel-doc:: lib/bitmap.c
-       :functions: bitmap_parselist bitmap_parselist_user
-
-    .. kernel-doc:: lib/idr.c
-       :functions:
-
 Without options, the kernel-doc directive includes all documentation comments
 from the source file.
 
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
@@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
     optional_arguments = 4
     option_spec = {
         'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
-        'functions': directives.unchanged,
         'export': directives.unchanged,
         'internal': directives.unchanged,
+        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
+        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
     }
     has_content = False
 
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
 
         filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
         export_file_patterns = []
+        identifiers = None
 
         # Tell sphinx of the dependency
         env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
@@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
             export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
         elif 'doc' in self.options:
             cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
+        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
+            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
         elif 'functions' in self.options:
-            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
-            if functions:
-                for f in functions:
-                    cmd += ['-function', f]
-            else:
-                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
+            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
 
         for pattern in export_file_patterns:
             for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
                 env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
                 cmd += ['-export-file', f]
 
+        if identifiers:
+            for i in identifiers:
+                cmd += ['-function', i]
+        elif identifiers is not None:
+            cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
+
         cmd += [filename]
 
         try:
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
  2019-10-20 13:17 [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' Changbin Du
@ 2019-10-20 18:05 ` Patchwork
  2019-10-20 18:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-20 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68277/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
5c039a1a525e kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
-:114: WARNING:NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>'

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 87 lines checked

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
  2019-10-20 13:17 [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' Changbin Du
  2019-10-20 18:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2019-10-20 18:35 ` Patchwork
  2019-10-20 20:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-20 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68277/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7136 -> Patchwork_14896
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14896 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
    - fi-skl-6260u:       [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([fdo#111934])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-skl-6260u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-skl-6260u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [DMESG-WARN][3] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_create@basic.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [INCOMPLETE][5] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#111381]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_switch@legacy-render.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_coherency:
    - fi-kbl-soraka:      [TIMEOUT][7] ([fdo#111944]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live_coherency.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@live_coherency.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
    - {fi-icl-u4}:        [INCOMPLETE][9] ([fdo#107713] / [fdo#108569]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-icl-u4/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-icl-u4/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [FAIL][11] ([fdo#111407]) -> [PASS][12]
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
  [fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569
  [fdo#111381]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111381
  [fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407
  [fdo#111934]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
  [fdo#111944]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111944


Participating hosts (51 -> 42)
------------------------------

  Missing    (9): fi-ilk-m540 fi-cml-s fi-hsw-4200u fi-tgl-u2 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_7136 -> Patchwork_14896

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_7136: 6f7e6926bb09b1ec80c5a3d44a930d690dd09d9c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5234: 1205552397bd8a19dc6e5abdaa727cc091dabbfe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_14896: 5c039a1a525e71cceaec2107512c9a1d64140bcf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

5c039a1a525e kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
  2019-10-20 13:17 [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' Changbin Du
  2019-10-20 18:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
  2019-10-20 18:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2019-10-20 20:14 ` Patchwork
  2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-20 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68277/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7136_full -> Patchwork_14896_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14896_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_14896_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14896_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-glk5/igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-glk4/igt@gem_tiled_blits@interruptible.html

  
#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@drm_import_export@import-close-race-flink:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb5/igt@drm_import_export@import-close-race-flink.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb5/igt@drm_import_export@import-close-race-flink.html

  
New tests
---------

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_7136_full and Patchwork_14896_full:

### New Piglit tests (5) ###

  * spec@arb_gpu_shader5@texturegather@fs-rg-0-uint-cubearray:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@arb_gpu_shader5@texturegather@fs-rg-1-uint-cubearray:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@arb_gpu_shader5@texturegatheroffset@fs-rgb-0-uint-2darray-const:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@arb_gpu_shader5@texturegatheroffset@fs-rgb-1-uint-2darray:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  * spec@arb_gpu_shader5@texturegatheroffset@fs-rgb-1-uint-2darray-const:
    - Statuses : 1 incomplete(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14896_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([fdo#111325]) +2 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276]) +6 similar issues
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd2.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd2.html

  * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrash-inactive:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([fdo#112037])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrash-inactive.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrash-inactive.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][11] -> [DMESG-WARN][12] ([fdo#111870]) +1 similar issue
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-snb1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-snb1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([fdo#111870])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][15] -> [INCOMPLETE][16] ([fdo#103665])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-kbl6/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][17] -> [INCOMPLETE][18] ([fdo#105411])
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-snb6/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-snb5/igt@i915_selftest@live_hangcheck.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][19] -> [DMESG-WARN][20] ([fdo#108566]) +4 similar issues
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-apl8/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-apl4/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html

  * igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-a:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][21] -> [DMESG-WARN][22] ([fdo#106107])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl6/igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-a.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl2/igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-a.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-a-single-move:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][23] -> [INCOMPLETE][24] ([fdo#107713])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-a-single-move.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-a-single-move.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-wc:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][25] -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109271]) +1 similar issue
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-snb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-wc.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-snb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-wc.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][27] -> [FAIL][28] ([fdo#103167]) +1 similar issue
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-blt.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][29] -> [SKIP][30] ([fdo#109441])
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][31] -> [FAIL][32] ([fdo#99912])
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-hsw5/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-hsw7/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][33] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][34] +2 similar issues
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-apl8/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-apl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [INCOMPLETE][35] ([fdo#111832]) -> [PASS][36]
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@q-smoketest-all:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [INCOMPLETE][37] ([fdo#111735]) -> [PASS][38]
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_ctx_shared@q-smoketest-all.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_ctx_shared@q-smoketest-all.html

  * igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
    - shard-iclb:         [INCOMPLETE][39] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][40]
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-batch-kernel-default-uc.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_flush@basic-batch-kernel-default-uc.html

  * igt@gem_exec_whisper@normal:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [INCOMPLETE][41] -> [PASS][42] +1 similar issue
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_whisper@normal.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_whisper@normal.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy:
    - shard-snb:          [DMESG-WARN][43] ([fdo#111870]) -> [PASS][44]
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-snb4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-snb4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close:
    - shard-hsw:          [DMESG-WARN][45] ([fdo#111870]) -> [PASS][46]
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-hsw7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close.html

  * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [INCOMPLETE][47] ([fdo#111832] / [fdo#111850]) -> [PASS][48] +1 similar issue
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade_with_suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][49] ([fdo#104108]) -> [PASS][50]
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade_with_suspend.html
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl2/igt@i915_pm_backlight@fade_with_suspend.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][51] ([fdo#104108] / [fdo#107807]) -> [PASS][52]
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl10/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][53] ([fdo#111934]) -> [PASS][54]
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl10/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl5/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
    - shard-apl:          [INCOMPLETE][55] ([fdo#103927] / [fdo#112065]) -> [PASS][56]
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-apl7/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-apl7/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-32bpp-rotate-90:
    - shard-apl:          [INCOMPLETE][57] ([fdo#103927]) -> [PASS][58]
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-apl3/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-32bpp-rotate-90.html
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-apl4/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-32bpp-rotate-90.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][59] ([fdo#105363]) -> [PASS][60]
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-glk9/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank.html
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-glk8/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][61] ([fdo#109507]) -> [PASS][62]
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][63] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][64] +4 similar issues
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt:
    - {shard-tglb}:       [FAIL][65] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][66] +3 similar issues
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][67] ([fdo#108145]) -> [PASS][68]
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-skl9/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-skl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][69] ([fdo#103166]) -> [PASS][70]
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x.html
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-x.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][71] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068]) -> [PASS][72]
   [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
   [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][74] +1 similar issue
   [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs.html
   [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs.html

  * igt@perf@oa-exponents:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][75] ([fdo#105483]) -> [PASS][76]
   [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-glk5/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html
   [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-glk4/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html

  * igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][77] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][78] +9 similar issues
   [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb6/igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2.html
   [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb2/igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109276]) -> [FAIL][80] ([fdo#111329])
   [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv.html
   [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv.html

  * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109276]) -> [FAIL][82] ([fdo#111330])
   [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7136/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-bsd2.html
   [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-bsd2.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo# 112000 ]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id= 112000 
  [fdo#103166]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
  [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  [fdo#103665]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
  [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  [fdo#104108]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
  [fdo#105363]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363
  [fdo#105411]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105411
  [fdo#105483]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105483
  [fdo#106107]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106107
  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#107807]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107807
  [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
  [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#109507]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109507
  [fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
  [fdo#110548]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110548
  [fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
  [fdo#111325]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111325
  [fdo#111329]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111329
  [fdo#111330]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111330
  [fdo#111597]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111597
  [fdo#111646]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111646
  [fdo#111735]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111735
  [fdo#111781]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781
  [fdo#111830 ]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111830 
  [fdo#111832]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111832
  [fdo#111850]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111850
  [fdo#111865]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111865
  [fdo#111870]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870
  [fdo#111934]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111934
  [fdo#112037]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112037
  [fdo#112065]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112065
  [fdo#99912]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912


Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_7136 -> Patchwork_14896

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_7136: 6f7e6926bb09b1ec80c5a3d44a930d690dd09d9c @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5234: 1205552397bd8a19dc6e5abdaa727cc091dabbfe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_14896: 5c039a1a525e71cceaec2107512c9a1d64140bcf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14896/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-24 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-crypto,
	linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga, linux-usb,
	dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox, jani.nikula,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> all documentation are updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>

So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>      optional_arguments = 4
>      option_spec = {
>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>      }
>      has_content = False
>  
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>  
>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>          export_file_patterns = []
> +        identifiers = None
>  
>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> -            if functions:
> -                for f in functions:
> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> -            else:
> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()

Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:

    elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):

...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
identifiers==None .

Thanks,

jon

>          for pattern in export_file_patterns:
>              for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
>                  env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
>                  cmd += ['-export-file', f]
>  
> +        if identifiers:
> +            for i in identifiers:
> +                cmd += ['-function', i]
> +        elif identifiers is not None:
> +            cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +
>          cmd += [filename]
>  
>          try:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-24 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc, linux-pci,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> all documentation are updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>

So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>      optional_arguments = 4
>      option_spec = {
>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>      }
>      has_content = False
>  
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>  
>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>          export_file_patterns = []
> +        identifiers = None
>  
>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> -            if functions:
> -                for f in functions:
> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> -            else:
> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()

Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:

    elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):

...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
identifiers==None .

Thanks,

jon

>          for pattern in export_file_patterns:
>              for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
>                  env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
>                  cmd += ['-export-file', f]
>  
> +        if identifiers:
> +            for i in identifiers:
> +                cmd += ['-function', i]
> +        elif identifiers is not None:
> +            cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +
>          cmd += [filename]
>  
>          try:
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-24 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc, linux-pci,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> all documentation are updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>

So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>      optional_arguments = 4
>      option_spec = {
>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>      }
>      has_content = False
>  
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>  
>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>          export_file_patterns = []
> +        identifiers = None
>  
>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> -            if functions:
> -                for f in functions:
> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> -            else:
> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()

Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:

    elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):

...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
identifiers==None .

Thanks,

jon

>          for pattern in export_file_patterns:
>              for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
>                  env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
>                  cmd += ['-export-file', f]
>  
> +        if identifiers:
> +            for i in identifiers:
> +                cmd += ['-function', i]
> +        elif identifiers is not None:
> +            cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +
>          cmd += [filename]
>  
>          try:
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25  6:57     ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-25  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-crypto,
	linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga, linux-usb,
	dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> all documentation are updated.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>
> So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>      optional_arguments = 4
>>      option_spec = {
>>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>>      }
>>      has_content = False
>>  
>> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>  
>>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>>          export_file_patterns = []
>> +        identifiers = None
>>  
>>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> -            if functions:
>> -                for f in functions:
>> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> -            else:
>> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>
> Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>
>     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>
> ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> identifiers==None .

I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
the get('functions') part.

One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):

        # backward compat
        if 'functions' in self.options:
            if 'identifiers' in self.options:
                kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
            else:
                self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25  6:57     ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-25  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc, linux-pci,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> all documentation are updated.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>
> So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>      optional_arguments = 4
>>      option_spec = {
>>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>>      }
>>      has_content = False
>>  
>> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>  
>>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>>          export_file_patterns = []
>> +        identifiers = None
>>  
>>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> -            if functions:
>> -                for f in functions:
>> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> -            else:
>> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>
> Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>
>     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>
> ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> identifiers==None .

I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
the get('functions') part.

One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):

        # backward compat
        if 'functions' in self.options:
            if 'identifiers' in self.options:
                kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
            else:
                self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25  6:57     ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-25  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc, linux-pci,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> all documentation are updated.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>
> So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>      optional_arguments = 4
>>      option_spec = {
>>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>>      }
>>      has_content = False
>>  
>> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>  
>>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>>          export_file_patterns = []
>> +        identifiers = None
>>  
>>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> -            if functions:
>> -                for f in functions:
>> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> -            else:
>> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>
> Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>
>     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>
> ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> identifiers==None .

I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
the get('functions') part.

One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):

        # backward compat
        if 'functions' in self.options:
            if 'identifiers' in self.options:
                kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
            else:
                self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25 14:48       ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-25 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >
> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >>      option_spec = {
> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >>      }
> >>      has_content = False
> >>  
> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>  
> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> +        identifiers = None
> >>  
> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> -            if functions:
> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> -            else:
> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >
> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >
> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >
> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> > identifiers==None .
> 
> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> the get('functions') part.
> 
> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> 
>         # backward compat
>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
same doc.

>             else:
>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>
After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25 14:48       ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-25 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >
> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >>      option_spec = {
> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >>      }
> >>      has_content = False
> >>  
> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>  
> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> +        identifiers = None
> >>  
> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> -            if functions:
> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> -            else:
> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >
> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >
> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >
> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> > identifiers==None .
> 
> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> the get('functions') part.
> 
> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> 
>         # backward compat
>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
same doc.

>             else:
>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>
After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-25 14:48       ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-25 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >
> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >>      option_spec = {
> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >>      }
> >>      has_content = False
> >>  
> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>  
> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> +        identifiers = None
> >>  
> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> -            if functions:
> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> -            else:
> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >
> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >
> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >
> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> > identifiers==None .
> 
> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> the get('functions') part.
> 
> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> 
>         # backward compat
>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
same doc.

>             else:
>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
>
After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
  2019-10-25 14:48       ` Changbin Du
                           ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-28  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> >> all documentation are updated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>      optional_arguments = 4
>> >>      option_spec = {
>> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>> >>      }
>> >>      has_content = False
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>  
>> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>> >>          export_file_patterns = []
>> >> +        identifiers = None
>> >>  
>> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >> -            if functions:
>> >> -                for f in functions:
>> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> >> -            else:
>> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >
>> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>> >
>> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>> >
>> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
>> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
>> > identifiers==None .
>> 
>> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
>> the get('functions') part.
>> 
>> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
>> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
>> 
>>         # backward compat
>>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> same doc.

Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?

>
>>             else:
>>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
> After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.


BR,
Jani.



>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-28  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga,
	linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> >> all documentation are updated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>      optional_arguments = 4
>> >>      option_spec = {
>> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>> >>      }
>> >>      has_content = False
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>  
>> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>> >>          export_file_patterns = []
>> >> +        identifiers = None
>> >>  
>> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >> -            if functions:
>> >> -                for f in functions:
>> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> >> -            else:
>> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >
>> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>> >
>> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>> >
>> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
>> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
>> > identifiers==None .
>> 
>> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
>> the get('functions') part.
>> 
>> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
>> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
>> 
>>         # backward compat
>>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> same doc.

Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?

>
>>             else:
>>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
> After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.


BR,
Jani.



>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-28  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Changbin Du, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
	linux-crypto-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kselftest-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-fpga-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
	intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du <changbin.du-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> >> all documentation are updated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> >
>> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>      optional_arguments = 4
>> >>      option_spec = {
>> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>> >>      }
>> >>      has_content = False
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>  
>> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>> >>          export_file_patterns = []
>> >> +        identifiers = None
>> >>  
>> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >> -            if functions:
>> >> -                for f in functions:
>> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> >> -            else:
>> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >
>> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>> >
>> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>> >
>> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
>> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
>> > identifiers==None .
>> 
>> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
>> the get('functions') part.
>> 
>> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
>> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
>> 
>>         # backward compat
>>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> same doc.

Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?

>
>>             else:
>>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
> After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.


BR,
Jani.



>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-28  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> >> all documentation are updated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>      optional_arguments = 4
>> >>      option_spec = {
>> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>> >>      }
>> >>      has_content = False
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>  
>> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>> >>          export_file_patterns = []
>> >> +        identifiers = None
>> >>  
>> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >> -            if functions:
>> >> -                for f in functions:
>> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> >> -            else:
>> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >
>> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>> >
>> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>> >
>> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
>> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
>> > identifiers==None .
>> 
>> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
>> the get('functions') part.
>> 
>> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
>> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
>> 
>>         # backward compat
>>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> same doc.

Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?

>
>>             else:
>>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
> After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.


BR,
Jani.



>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2019-10-28  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
>> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
>> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
>> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
>> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
>> >> all documentation are updated.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
>> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>      optional_arguments = 4
>> >>      option_spec = {
>> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
>> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
>> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
>> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
>> >>      }
>> >>      has_content = False
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>  
>> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
>> >>          export_file_patterns = []
>> >> +        identifiers = None
>> >>  
>> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
>> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
>> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
>> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
>> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
>> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
>> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
>> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >> -            if functions:
>> >> -                for f in functions:
>> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
>> >> -            else:
>> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
>> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
>> >
>> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
>> >
>> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
>> >
>> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
>> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
>> > identifiers==None .
>> 
>> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
>> the get('functions') part.
>> 
>> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
>> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
>> 
>>         # backward compat
>>         if 'functions' in self.options:
>>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
>>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> same doc.

Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?

>
>>             else:
>>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
> After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)

But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
and '' being confusing.


BR,
Jani.



>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  0:31           ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-29  0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: Changbin Du, Jonathan Corbet, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> >> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >> >>      option_spec = {
> >> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >> >>      }
> >> >>      has_content = False
> >> >>  
> >> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>  
> >> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> >> +        identifiers = None
> >> >>  
> >> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >> -            if functions:
> >> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> >> -            else:
> >> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >
> >> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >> >
> >> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >> >
> >> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> >> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> >> > identifiers==None .
> >> 
> >> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> >> the get('functions') part.
> >> 
> >> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> >> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> >> 
> >>         # backward compat
> >>         if 'functions' in self.options:
> >>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> > This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> > same doc.
> 
> Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
> would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?
>
yes, my mistake. Mine does the same thing.

> >
> >>             else:
> >>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> >> 
> >> BR,
> >> Jani.
> >>
> > After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)
> 
> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
> and '' being confusing.
>
Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
Note such condition is common in python.

Again, I am ok with both.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  0:31           ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-29  0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, Jonathan Corbet,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-doc, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx,
	Changbin Du

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> >> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >> >>      option_spec = {
> >> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >> >>      }
> >> >>      has_content = False
> >> >>  
> >> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>  
> >> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> >> +        identifiers = None
> >> >>  
> >> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >> -            if functions:
> >> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> >> -            else:
> >> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >
> >> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >> >
> >> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >> >
> >> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> >> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> >> > identifiers==None .
> >> 
> >> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> >> the get('functions') part.
> >> 
> >> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> >> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> >> 
> >>         # backward compat
> >>         if 'functions' in self.options:
> >>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> > This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> > same doc.
> 
> Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
> would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?
>
yes, my mistake. Mine does the same thing.

> >
> >>             else:
> >>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> >> 
> >> BR,
> >> Jani.
> >>
> > After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)
> 
> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
> and '' being confusing.
>
Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
Note such condition is common in python.

Again, I am ok with both.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  0:31           ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-29  0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, Jonathan Corbet,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-doc, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx,
	Changbin Du

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 09:57:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
> >> > Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> >> >> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> >> >> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> >> >> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> >> >> all documentation are updated.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> >> >> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>      optional_arguments = 4
> >> >>      option_spec = {
> >> >>          'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> >> >> -        'functions': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'export': directives.unchanged,
> >> >>          'internal': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> >> >> +        'functions': directives.unchanged,  # alias of 'identifiers'
> >> >>      }
> >> >>      has_content = False
> >> >>  
> >> >> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>  
> >> >>          filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> >> >>          export_file_patterns = []
> >> >> +        identifiers = None
> >> >>  
> >> >>          # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> >> >>          env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> >> >> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> >> >>              export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> >> >>          elif 'doc' in self.options:
> >> >>              cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> >> >> +        elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> >> >>          elif 'functions' in self.options:
> >> >> -            functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >> -            if functions:
> >> >> -                for f in functions:
> >> >> -                    cmd += ['-function', f]
> >> >> -            else:
> >> >> -                cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> >> >> +            identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
> >> >
> >> > Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
> >> >
> >> >     elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
> >> >
> >> > ...then leave the rest of the code intact?  It keeps the logic together,
> >> > and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
> >> > identifiers==None .
> >> 
> >> I think the problem is you still need to distinguish between the two for
> >> the get('functions') part.
> >> 
> >> One option is to rename 'functions' to 'identifiers' in the above block,
> >> and put something like this above the whole if ladder (untested):
> >> 
> >>         # backward compat
> >>         if 'functions' in self.options:
> >>             if 'identifiers' in self.options:
> >>                 kernellog.warn(env.app, "fail")
> > This will miss the content of 'functions' directive if both exist in
> > same doc.
> 
> Did you not notice your patch does the same, except silently, while this
> would produce a warning? Which one is less surprising?
>
yes, my mistake. Mine does the same thing.

> >
> >>             else:
> >>                 self.options.set('identifiers', self.options.get('functions'))
> >> 
> >> BR,
> >> Jani.
> >>
> > After comparing, I still perfer my original code which is simpler. :)
> 
> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
> and '' being confusing.
>
Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
Note such condition is common in python.

Again, I am ok with both.

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
  2019-10-29  0:31           ` Changbin Du
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Markus Heiser @ 2019-10-29  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du, Jani Nikula
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga,
	linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

Am 29.10.19 um 01:31 schrieb Changbin Du:
>> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
>> and '' being confusing.
>>
> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

The one is a empty string str(''), its bool('') value is False.

| >>> type(''), bool('')
| (<class 'str'>, False)

The other is a NoneType, its bool(None) value is False.

| >>> type(None), bool(None)
| (<class 'NoneType'>, False)

None often used like NULL (pointer). E.g if a function does not give an explicit 
return value, the returned value is None.

| >>> def foo():
| ...     pass
| ...
| >>> print(foo())
| None


-- Markus --


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Markus Heiser @ 2019-10-29  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du, Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx

Am 29.10.19 um 01:31 schrieb Changbin Du:
>> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
>> and '' being confusing.
>>
> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

The one is a empty string str(''), its bool('') value is False.

| >>> type(''), bool('')
| (<class 'str'>, False)

The other is a NoneType, its bool(None) value is False.

| >>> type(None), bool(None)
| (<class 'NoneType'>, False)

None often used like NULL (pointer). E.g if a function does not give an explicit 
return value, the returned value is None.

| >>> def foo():
| ...     pass
| ...
| >>> print(foo())
| None


-- Markus --

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Markus Heiser @ 2019-10-29  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du, Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx

Am 29.10.19 um 01:31 schrieb Changbin Du:
>> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
>> and '' being confusing.
>>
> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

The one is a empty string str(''), its bool('') value is False.

| >>> type(''), bool('')
| (<class 'str'>, False)

The other is a NoneType, its bool(None) value is False.

| >>> type(None), bool(None)
| (<class 'NoneType'>, False)

None often used like NULL (pointer). E.g if a function does not give an explicit 
return value, the returned value is None.

| >>> def foo():
| ...     pass
| ...
| >>> print(foo())
| None


-- Markus --

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Markus Heiser @ 2019-10-29  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du, Jani Nikula
  Cc: linux-usb, Matthew Wilcox, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, Jonathan Corbet, linux-wireless,
	linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest,
	intel-gfx

Am 29.10.19 um 01:31 schrieb Changbin Du:
>> But is it, really? I agree with Jon about the distinction between None
>> and '' being confusing.
>>
> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

The one is a empty string str(''), its bool('') value is False.

| >>> type(''), bool('')
| (<class 'str'>, False)

The other is a NoneType, its bool(None) value is False.

| >>> type(None), bool(None)
| (<class 'NoneType'>, False)

None often used like NULL (pointer). E.g if a function does not give an explicit 
return value, the returned value is None.

| >>> def foo():
| ...     pass
| ...
| >>> print(foo())
| None


-- Markus --

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-29  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Jani Nikula, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-mm,
	linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless, linux-fpga,
	linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.

Thanks,

jon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-29  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Jani Nikula, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
	linux-crypto-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kselftest-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-fpga-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW,
	intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.

Thanks,

jon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-29  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.

Thanks,

jon
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2019-10-29  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Changbin Du
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:

> Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> Note such condition is common in python.

Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.

Thanks,

jon
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-31 13:50               ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet
  Cc: Changbin Du, Jani Nikula, linux-pci, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, linux-wireless,
	linux-fpga, linux-usb, dri-devel, intel-gfx, Matthew Wilcox,
	Thomas Zimmermann

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:27AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> > Note such condition is common in python.
> 
> Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
> elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
> so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.
>
ok, please check update in v3.

> Thanks,
> 
> jon

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-31 13:50               ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:27AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> > Note such condition is common in python.
> 
> Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
> elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
> so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.
>
ok, please check update in v3.

> Thanks,
> 
> jon

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers'
@ 2019-10-31 13:50               ` Changbin Du
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2019-10-31 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Corbet
  Cc: Matthew Wilcox, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, linux-doc,
	linux-pci, linux-fpga, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, linux-crypto, linux-kselftest, intel-gfx, Changbin Du

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:00:27AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python.
> > Note such condition is common in python.
> 
> Treating both as a False value is reasonably common.  Treating them
> elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less
> so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid.
>
ok, please check update in v3.

> Thanks,
> 
> jon

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-01  8:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-20 13:17 [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' Changbin Du
2019-10-20 18:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-10-20 18:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-20 20:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-24 18:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-24 18:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-24 18:19   ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-25  6:57   ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-25  6:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-10-25  6:57     ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-25 14:48     ` Changbin Du
2019-10-25 14:48       ` [Intel-gfx] " Changbin Du
2019-10-25 14:48       ` Changbin Du
2019-10-28  9:24       ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-28  9:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-28  9:24         ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-29  0:31         ` Changbin Du
2019-10-29  0:31           ` [Intel-gfx] " Changbin Du
2019-10-29  0:31           ` Changbin Du
2019-10-29  5:42           ` Markus Heiser
2019-10-29  5:42             ` [Intel-gfx] " Markus Heiser
2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
2019-10-29  5:42             ` Markus Heiser
2019-10-29  8:00           ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-29  8:00             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-29  8:00             ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-10-31 13:50             ` Changbin Du
2019-10-31 13:50               ` [Intel-gfx] " Changbin Du
2019-10-31 13:50               ` Changbin Du

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.