[PATCH] defer/rcuintro: Substitute smp_store_release() for WRITE_ONCE()

[PATCH] defer/rcuintro: Substitute smp_store_release() for WRITE_ONCE()

[Akira Yokosawa]

From 6845d0f978a81ef17d0011bebb500087f39f9a45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:19:13 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] defer/rcuintro: Substitute smp_store_release() for WRITE_ONCE()

This change corresponds to the update of Figure 9.7 by commit
6bc87460e2ad ("defer/rcuintro: Fix colors, fonts, and primitives
in Figures 9.6 and 9.7").

Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
---
 defer/rcuintro.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/defer/rcuintro.tex b/defer/rcuintro.tex
index dc750326..6702153a 100644
--- a/defer/rcuintro.tex
+++ b/defer/rcuintro.tex
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ Again, this same constraint is imposed on reader threads dereferencing
 they are done using the pointed-to data item.
 Returning to the second row of
 Figure~\ref{fig:defer:Deletion With Concurrent Readers},
-where the updater has just completed executing the \co{WRITE_ONCE()},
+where the updater has just completed executing the \co{smp_store_release()},
 imagine that CPU~0 executes a context switch.
 Because readers are not permitted to block while traversing the linked
 list, we are guaranteed that all prior readers that might have been running on
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] defer/rcuintro: Substitute smp_store_release() for WRITE_ONCE()

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:29:04AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >From 6845d0f978a81ef17d0011bebb500087f39f9a45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:19:13 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] defer/rcuintro: Substitute smp_store_release() for WRITE_ONCE()
> 
> This change corresponds to the update of Figure 9.7 by commit
> 6bc87460e2ad ("defer/rcuintro: Fix colors, fonts, and primitives
> in Figures 9.6 and 9.7").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>

Queued and pushed, thank you!

								Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  defer/rcuintro.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/defer/rcuintro.tex b/defer/rcuintro.tex
> index dc750326..6702153a 100644
> --- a/defer/rcuintro.tex
> +++ b/defer/rcuintro.tex
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ Again, this same constraint is imposed on reader threads dereferencing
>  they are done using the pointed-to data item.
>  Returning to the second row of
>  Figure~\ref{fig:defer:Deletion With Concurrent Readers},
> -where the updater has just completed executing the \co{WRITE_ONCE()},
> +where the updater has just completed executing the \co{smp_store_release()},
>  imagine that CPU~0 executes a context switch.
>  Because readers are not permitted to block while traversing the linked
>  list, we are guaranteed that all prior readers that might have been running on
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>