All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@endlessm.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: increase D3 delay for AMD Ryzen5/7 XHCI controllers
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:40:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023224003.GA31692@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022093349.GC2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:33:49PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:40:00AM +0800, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:33 PM Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > Just to be sure, did you try the patch or just looked at it? Because
> > > what the patch does is that it does the delay when the downstream/root
> > > port is resumed, not the xHCI itself.
> > 
> > I tried it, it didn't fix the problem.
> 
> :(
> 
> It may very well be that this particular xHCI controller needs more than
> that 10ms from D3hot -> D0 transition. Again the PCIe spec says the 10ms
> is the minimum time system software needs to delay but it does not say
> what would be the maximum time the function absolutely must be properly
> in D0.

Hmm, PCIe r5.0, sec 2.3.1, says devices are permitted to return
Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS) after a "reset initiated in
response to a D3hot to D0uninitialized" transition.

I think that applies to this device because your lspci [1] shows:

	Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

so No_Soft_Reset is clear, which means the D3hot to D0 transition goes
to D0uninitialized.

pci_raw_set_power_state() *does* delay, generally for 10ms:

  pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, pmcsr);
  if (state == PCI_D3hot || dev->current_state == PCI_D3hot)
    pci_dev_d3_sleep(dev);
  pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);

but there's no mention of CRS, so I think that config read is liable
to fail with CRS if the device isn't ready, and we won't notice.

I think we need something like the patch below.  We already do
basically the same thing in pci_pm_reset().

[1] https://gist.github.com/dsd/bd9370b35defdf43680b81ecb34381d5

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index e7982af9a5d8..e8702388830f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -883,9 +883,10 @@ static int pci_raw_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
 	 * Mandatory power management transition delays; see PCI PM 1.1
 	 * 5.6.1 table 18
 	 */
-	if (state == PCI_D3hot || dev->current_state == PCI_D3hot)
+	if (state == PCI_D3hot || dev->current_state == PCI_D3hot) {
 		pci_dev_d3_sleep(dev);
-	else if (state == PCI_D2 || dev->current_state == PCI_D2)
+		pci_dev_wait(dev, "D3 transition", PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS);
+	} else if (state == PCI_D2 || dev->current_state == PCI_D2)
 		udelay(PCI_PM_D2_DELAY);
 
 	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14  6:13 [PATCH] PCI: increase D3 delay for AMD Ryzen5/7 XHCI controllers Daniel Drake
2019-10-14 15:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-15  5:31   ` Daniel Drake
2019-10-15 17:52     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-16  6:14       ` Daniel Drake
2019-10-21 11:33     ` Mika Westerberg
2019-10-22  2:40       ` Daniel Drake
2019-10-22  9:33         ` Mika Westerberg
2019-10-23 22:40           ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-10-24  3:28             ` Daniel Drake
2019-10-24 17:00               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-25  7:11                 ` Daniel Drake
2019-10-25 16:28                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-28  6:32                     ` Daniel Drake
2019-11-18  8:52                       ` Daniel Drake
2019-11-20  0:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-21 18:15   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-22  3:00     ` Daniel Drake
2019-11-22 11:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-11-25  3:45         ` Daniel Drake
2019-11-25 13:37           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191023224003.GA31692@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=drake@endlessm.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@endlessm.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.