All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-stable-4.14 35/48] arm64: fix SSBS sanitization
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:48:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024124833.4158-36-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024124833.4158-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit f54dada8274643e3ff4436df0ea124aeedc43cae ]

In valid_user_regs() we treat SSBS as a RES0 bit, and consequently it is
unexpectedly cleared when we restore a sigframe or fiddle with GPRs via
ptrace.

This patch fixes valid_user_regs() to account for this, updating the
function to refer to the latest ARM ARM (ARM DDI 0487D.a). For AArch32
tasks, SSBS appears in bit 23 of SPSR_EL1, matching its position in the
AArch32-native PSR format, and we don't need to translate it as we have
to for DIT.

There are no other bit assignments that we need to account for today.
As the recent documentation describes the DIT bit, we can drop our
comment regarding DIT.

While removing SSBS from the RES0 masks, existing inconsistent
whitespace is corrected.

Fixes: d71be2b6c0e19180 ("arm64: cpufeature: Detect SSBS and advertise to userspace")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index d8ff8f26db6d..242527f29c41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1402,19 +1402,20 @@ asmlinkage void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
 }
 
 /*
- * SPSR_ELx bits which are always architecturally RES0 per ARM DDI 0487C.a
- * We also take into account DIT (bit 24), which is not yet documented, and
- * treat PAN and UAO as RES0 bits, as they are meaningless at EL0, and may be
- * allocated an EL0 meaning in future.
+ * SPSR_ELx bits which are always architecturally RES0 per ARM DDI 0487D.a.
+ * We permit userspace to set SSBS (AArch64 bit 12, AArch32 bit 23) which is
+ * not described in ARM DDI 0487D.a.
+ * We treat PAN and UAO as RES0 bits, as they are meaningless at EL0, and may
+ * be allocated an EL0 meaning in future.
  * Userspace cannot use these until they have an architectural meaning.
  * Note that this follows the SPSR_ELx format, not the AArch32 PSR format.
  * We also reserve IL for the kernel; SS is handled dynamically.
  */
 #define SPSR_EL1_AARCH64_RES0_BITS \
-	(GENMASK_ULL(63,32) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 25) | GENMASK_ULL(23, 22) | \
-	 GENMASK_ULL(20, 10) | GENMASK_ULL(5, 5))
+	(GENMASK_ULL(63, 32) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 25) | GENMASK_ULL(23, 22) | \
+	 GENMASK_ULL(20, 13) | GENMASK_ULL(11, 10) | GENMASK_ULL(5, 5))
 #define SPSR_EL1_AARCH32_RES0_BITS \
-	(GENMASK_ULL(63,32) | GENMASK_ULL(23, 22) | GENMASK_ULL(20,20))
+	(GENMASK_ULL(63, 32) | GENMASK_ULL(22, 22) | GENMASK_ULL(20, 20))
 
 static int valid_compat_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs)
 {
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24 12:47 [PATCH for-stable-4.14 00/48] arm64 spec mitigation backports Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 01/48] arm64: sysreg: Move to use definitions for all the SCTLR bits Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 02/48] arm64: Expose support for optional ARMv8-A features Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 03/48] arm64: Fix the feature type for ID register fields Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 04/48] arm64: v8.4: Support for new floating point multiplication instructions Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 05/48] arm64: Documentation: cpu-feature-registers: Remove RES0 fields Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 06/48] arm64: Expose Arm v8.4 features Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 07/48] arm64: move SCTLR_EL{1,2} assertions to <asm/sysreg.h> Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 08/48] arm64: add PSR_AA32_* definitions Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 09/48] arm64: Introduce sysreg_clear_set() Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 10/48] arm64: capabilities: Update prototype for enable call back Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 11/48] arm64: capabilities: Move errata work around check on boot CPU Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 12/48] arm64: capabilities: Move errata processing code Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 13/48] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for fine grained capabilities Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:47 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 14/48] arm64: capabilities: Add flags to handle the conflicts on late CPU Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 15/48] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 16/48] arm64: capabilities: Filter the entries based on a given mask Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 17/48] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for grouping features and errata work arounds Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 18/48] arm64: capabilities: Split the processing of " Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 19/48] arm64: capabilities: Allow features based on local CPU scope Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 20/48] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata workarounds Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 21/48] arm64: capabilities: Introduce weak features based on local CPU Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 22/48] arm64: capabilities: Restrict KPTI detection to boot-time CPUs Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 23/48] arm64: capabilities: Add support for features enabled early Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 24/48] arm64: capabilities: Change scope of VHE to Boot CPU feature Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 25/48] arm64: capabilities: Clean up midr range helpers Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 26/48] arm64: Add helpers for checking CPU MIDR against a range Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 27/48] arm64: Add MIDR encoding for Arm Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 28/48] arm64: capabilities: Add support for checks based on a list of MIDRs Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 29/48] arm64: KVM: Use SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 for Falkor BP hardening Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 30/48] arm64: don't zero DIT on signal return Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 31/48] arm64: Get rid of __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_* Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 32/48] arm64: cpufeature: Detect SSBS and advertise to userspace Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 33/48] arm64: ssbd: Add support for PSTATE.SSBS rather than trapping to EL3 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 34/48] KVM: arm64: Set SCTLR_EL2.DSSBS if SSBD is forcefully disabled and !vhe Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 36/48] arm64: Add sysfs vulnerability show for spectre-v1 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 37/48] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for meltdown Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 38/48] arm64: enable generic CPU vulnerabilites support Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 39/48] arm64: Always enable ssb vulnerability detection Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 40/48] arm64: Provide a command line to disable spectre_v2 mitigation Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 41/48] arm64: Advertise mitigation of Spectre-v2, or lack thereof Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 42/48] arm64: Always enable spectre-v2 vulnerability detection Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 14:34   ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-10-24 14:37     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-25 15:25       ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-25 15:28         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-25 15:39           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-26  8:01             ` Greg KH
2019-10-26 15:40               ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-26 15:46                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-27 13:39                   ` Greg KH
2019-10-27 17:39                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 43/48] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for spectre-v2 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 44/48] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for speculative store bypass Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 45/48] arm64: ssbs: Don't treat CPUs with SSBS as unaffected by SSB Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 46/48] arm64: Force SSBS on context switch Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 47/48] arm64: Use firmware to detect CPUs that are not affected by Spectre-v2 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-24 12:48 ` [PATCH for-stable-4.14 48/48] arm64/speculation: Support 'mitigations=' cmdline option Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191024124833.4158-36-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.