All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	ltp@lists.linux.it, "Piotr Król" <piotr.krol@3mdeb.com>,
	"Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ima: skip verifying TPM 2.0 PCR values
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:20:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024172023.GA7948@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024121848.GA5908@dell5510>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I wonder what to do with this patch "ima: skip verifying TPM 2.0 PCR values" [1].
> Is it a correct way to differentiate between TPM 1.2 and TPM 2.0?
> Or something else should be applied?
> 
> How is the work on TPM 2.0 Linux sysfs interface?
> But even it's done in near future, we'd still need some way for older kernels.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1100733/

version_major sysfs file would be acceptable if someone wants to proceed
and send such patch.

Also replicants for durations and timeouts files would make sense for
TPM 2.0.

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] ima: skip verifying TPM 2.0 PCR values
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:20:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024172023.GA7948@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024121848.GA5908@dell5510>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I wonder what to do with this patch "ima: skip verifying TPM 2.0 PCR values" [1].
> Is it a correct way to differentiate between TPM 1.2 and TPM 2.0?
> Or something else should be applied?
> 
> How is the work on TPM 2.0 Linux sysfs interface?
> But even it's done in near future, we'd still need some way for older kernels.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1100733/

version_major sysfs file would be acceptable if someone wants to proceed
and send such patch.

Also replicants for durations and timeouts files would make sense for
TPM 2.0.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16 21:12 [PATCH] ima: skip verifying TPM 2.0 PCR values Mimi Zohar
2019-05-16 21:12 ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2019-05-17  6:51 ` Petr Vorel
2019-05-17  6:51   ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2019-05-17 11:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-05-17 11:19     ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2019-05-17 11:28     ` Petr Vorel
2019-05-17 11:28       ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2019-05-17 13:50 ` Nayna
2019-05-17 13:50   ` [LTP] " Nayna
2019-05-17 15:04   ` Petr Vorel
2019-05-17 15:04     ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2019-10-24 12:18     ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-24 12:18       ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-24 17:20       ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-10-24 17:20         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 18:20         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 18:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 19:14           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 19:14             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 23:36             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 23:36               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 20:51               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-28 20:51                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-24 21:38         ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-24 21:38           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-24 23:26           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 23:26             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-25  0:47           ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-25  0:47             ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-25  2:11             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-25  2:11               ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-25  8:56               ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-25  8:56                 ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-25 12:52                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2019-10-25 12:52                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2019-10-25 13:22                   ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-25 13:22                     ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-25 13:25                   ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-25 13:25                     ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-25 14:13                 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-25 14:13                   ` Jerry Snitselaar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191024172023.GA7948@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=piotr.krol@3mdeb.com \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.