[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro

[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro

[Kuninori Morimoto]

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

for_each_dpcm_xx() macro is using "dpcm" as parameter (1),
but, it is also struct member (2).

	#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) \
	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream]...)
	                    ^^^^(1)      ^^^^(2)

Thus, it will be compile error if user not used "dpcm" as parameter

	for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dp)
	                             ^^
This patch fixup it.

Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
v1 -> v2

	- based on mark/for-5.5 branch

 include/sound/soc-dpcm.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
index e55aeb0..b654ebf 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
@@ -103,15 +103,15 @@ struct snd_soc_dpcm_runtime {
 	int trigger_pending; /* trigger cmd + 1 if pending, 0 if not */
 };
 
-#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm)				\
-	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe)
-
-#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)				\
-	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
-#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, dpcm, _dpcm)			\
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(dpcm, _dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
-#define for_each_dpcm_be_rollback(fe, stream, dpcm)			\
-	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, _dpcm)				\
+	list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe)
+
+#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, _dpcm)				\
+	list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, _dpcm, __dpcm)			\
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(_dpcm, __dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_be_rollback(fe, stream, _dpcm)			\
+	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(_dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
 
 /* can this BE stop and free */
 int snd_soc_dpcm_can_be_free_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From 4baabbf932ed4f97df8e18cf546d39b7c2138020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:56:10 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-dpcm: tidyup for_each_dpcm_xx() macro

for_each_dpcm_xx() macro is using "dpcm" as parameter (1),
but, it is also struct member (2).

	#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) \
	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream]...)
	                    ^^^^(1)      ^^^^(2)

Thus, it will be compile error if user not used "dpcm" as parameter

	for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dp)
	                             ^^
This patch fixup it.

Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tv7x7idx.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 include/sound/soc-dpcm.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
index e55aeb00ce2d..b654ebfc8766 100644
--- a/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
+++ b/include/sound/soc-dpcm.h
@@ -103,15 +103,15 @@ struct snd_soc_dpcm_runtime {
 	int trigger_pending; /* trigger cmd + 1 if pending, 0 if not */
 };
 
-#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm)				\
-	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe)
-
-#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)				\
-	list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
-#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, dpcm, _dpcm)			\
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(dpcm, _dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
-#define for_each_dpcm_be_rollback(fe, stream, dpcm)			\
-	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, _dpcm)				\
+	list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(be)->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe)
+
+#define for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, _dpcm)				\
+	list_for_each_entry(_dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_be_safe(fe, stream, _dpcm, __dpcm)			\
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(_dpcm, __dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
+#define for_each_dpcm_be_rollback(fe, stream, _dpcm)			\
+	list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(_dpcm, &(fe)->dpcm[stream].be_clients, list_be)
 
 /* can this BE stop and free */
 int snd_soc_dpcm_can_be_free_stop(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe,
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel