* [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring
@ 2019-09-22 21:52 Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
2019-10-29 13:17 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Osipenko @ 2019-09-22 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Turquette, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter,
Peter De Schrijver, Prashant Gaikwad, Stephen Boyd
Cc: linux-clk, linux-tegra, linux-kernel
There is no need to re-configure PLLX if its configuration in unchanged
on return from suspend / cpuidle, this saves 300us if PLLX is already
enabled (common case for cpuidle).
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
index cceefbd67a3b..4d8222f5c638 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
@@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
{
unsigned int reg, policy;
+ u32 misc, base;
/* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
reg = readl(clk_base + CCLK_BURST_POLICY);
@@ -968,15 +969,21 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
BUG();
if (reg != CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
- /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
- writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
- clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
- writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
- clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
-
- /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
- if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
- udelay(300);
+ misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
+ base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
+
+ if (misc != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
+ base != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
+ /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
+ writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
+ clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
+ writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
+ clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
+
+ /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
+ if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
+ udelay(300);
+ }
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
index a19840fac716..3b5bca44b7aa 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
@@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
{
unsigned int reg, policy;
+ u32 misc, base;
/* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
reg = readl(clk_base + CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST);
@@ -1148,15 +1149,21 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
BUG();
if (reg != CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
- /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
- writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
- clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
- writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
- clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
-
- /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
- if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
- udelay(300);
+ misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
+ base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
+
+ if (misc != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
+ base != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
+ /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
+ writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
+ clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
+ writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
+ clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
+
+ /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
+ if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
+ udelay(300);
+ }
}
/*
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring
2019-09-22 21:52 [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring Dmitry Osipenko
@ 2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
2019-10-29 13:17 ` Thierry Reding
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter De Schrijver @ 2019-10-28 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Osipenko
Cc: Michael Turquette, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter,
Prashant Gaikwad, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, linux-tegra,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:52:03AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> There is no need to re-configure PLLX if its configuration in unchanged
> on return from suspend / cpuidle, this saves 300us if PLLX is already
> enabled (common case for cpuidle).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> index cceefbd67a3b..4d8222f5c638 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> @@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
> static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> {
> unsigned int reg, policy;
> + u32 misc, base;
>
> /* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
> reg = readl(clk_base + CCLK_BURST_POLICY);
> @@ -968,15 +969,21 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> BUG();
>
> if (reg != CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
> - /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> - writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> - clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> - writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> - clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> -
> - /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> - if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> - udelay(300);
> + misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> + base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + if (misc != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
> + base != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
> + /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> + writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> + clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> + writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> + clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> + if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> + udelay(300);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> index a19840fac716..3b5bca44b7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> @@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
> static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> {
> unsigned int reg, policy;
> + u32 misc, base;
>
> /* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
> reg = readl(clk_base + CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST);
> @@ -1148,15 +1149,21 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> BUG();
>
> if (reg != CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
> - /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> - writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> - clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> - writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> - clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> -
> - /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> - if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> - udelay(300);
> + misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> + base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + if (misc != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
> + base != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
> + /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> + writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> + clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> + writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> + clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> + if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> + udelay(300);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.23.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring
@ 2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter De Schrijver @ 2019-10-28 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Osipenko
Cc: Michael Turquette, Thierry Reding, Jonathan Hunter,
Prashant Gaikwad, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, linux-tegra,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:52:03AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> There is no need to re-configure PLLX if its configuration in unchanged
> on return from suspend / cpuidle, this saves 300us if PLLX is already
> enabled (common case for cpuidle).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> index cceefbd67a3b..4d8222f5c638 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c
> @@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
> static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> {
> unsigned int reg, policy;
> + u32 misc, base;
>
> /* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
> reg = readl(clk_base + CCLK_BURST_POLICY);
> @@ -968,15 +969,21 @@ static void tegra20_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> BUG();
>
> if (reg != CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
> - /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> - writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> - clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> - writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> - clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> -
> - /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> - if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> - udelay(300);
> + misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> + base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + if (misc != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
> + base != tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
> + /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> + writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> + clk_base + PLLX_MISC);
> + writel(tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> + clk_base + PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> + if (tegra20_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> + udelay(300);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> index a19840fac716..3b5bca44b7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c
> @@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_suspend(void)
> static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> {
> unsigned int reg, policy;
> + u32 misc, base;
>
> /* Is CPU complex already running on PLLX? */
> reg = readl(clk_base + CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST);
> @@ -1148,15 +1149,21 @@ static void tegra30_cpu_clock_resume(void)
> BUG();
>
> if (reg != CLK_RESET_CCLK_BURST_POLICY_PLLX) {
> - /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> - writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> - clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> - writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> - clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> -
> - /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> - if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> - udelay(300);
> + misc = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> + base = readl_relaxed(clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + if (misc != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc ||
> + base != tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base) {
> + /* restore PLLX settings if CPU is on different PLL */
> + writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_misc,
> + clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_MISC);
> + writel(tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base,
> + clk_base + CLK_RESET_PLLX_BASE);
> +
> + /* wait for PLL stabilization if PLLX was enabled */
> + if (tegra30_cpu_clk_sctx.pllx_base & (1 << 30))
> + udelay(300);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.23.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring
2019-09-22 21:52 [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
@ 2019-10-29 13:17 ` Thierry Reding
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2019-10-29 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Osipenko
Cc: Michael Turquette, Jonathan Hunter, Peter De Schrijver,
Prashant Gaikwad, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, linux-tegra,
linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 551 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:52:03AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> There is no need to re-configure PLLX if its configuration in unchanged
> on return from suspend / cpuidle, this saves 300us if PLLX is already
> enabled (common case for cpuidle).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Applied to for-5.5/clk, thanks.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-29 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-22 21:52 [PATCH v1] clk: tegra20/30: Optimize PLLX configuration restoring Dmitry Osipenko
2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
2019-10-28 14:47 ` Peter De Schrijver
2019-10-29 13:17 ` Thierry Reding
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.