All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
@ 2019-10-31 13:07 Sumit Garg
  2019-11-07 11:06 ` Jens Wiklander
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumit Garg @ 2019-10-31 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jens.wiklander, Volodymyr_Babchuk; +Cc: tee-dev, linux-kernel, Sumit Garg

In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().

So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
optee_shm_register().

Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
---

Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.

 drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
 {
 	unsigned int order = get_order(size);
 	struct page *page;
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
 	if (!page)
@@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
 	shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
 	shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
 
-	return 0;
+	if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
+		shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
+		rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
+					(unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
+	}
+
+	return rc;
 }
 
 static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
 			 struct tee_shm *shm)
 {
+	if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
+		optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
+
 	free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
 	shm->kaddr = NULL;
 }
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
  2019-10-31 13:07 [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations Sumit Garg
@ 2019-11-07 11:06 ` Jens Wiklander
  2019-11-07 12:41   ` Sumit Garg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Wiklander @ 2019-11-07 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sumit Garg; +Cc: Volodymyr_Babchuk, tee-dev, linux-kernel, etienne.carriere

Hi Sumit,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:37:54PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
> dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
> during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().
> 
> So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
> optee_shm_register().
> 
> Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>

Looks good, I'm picking this up. Etienne told me has tested this on some
of his hardware so I'll add:
Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>

Thanks,
Jens

> ---
> 
> Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
> to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.
> 
>  drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
>  {
>  	unsigned int order = get_order(size);
>  	struct page *page;
> +	int rc = 0;
>  
>  	page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
>  	if (!page)
> @@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
>  	shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
>  	shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
> +		shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
> +		rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
> +					(unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
> +	}
> +
> +	return rc;
>  }
>  
>  static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
>  			 struct tee_shm *shm)
>  {
> +	if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
> +		optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
> +
>  	free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
>  	shm->kaddr = NULL;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
  2019-11-07 11:06 ` Jens Wiklander
@ 2019-11-07 12:41   ` Sumit Garg
  2019-11-08 10:39     ` Jens Wiklander
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumit Garg @ 2019-11-07 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Wiklander
  Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk, tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, etienne.carriere

Hi Jens,

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 16:36, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:37:54PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
> > dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
> > during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().
> >
> > So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
> > optee_shm_register().
> >
> > Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
>
> Looks good, I'm picking this up. Etienne told me has tested this on some
> of his hardware so I'll add:
> Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
>

Thanks for picking this up.

>
> > ---
> >
> > Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
> > to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.

You also need to pick up the dependency patch too. The latest v3 of
this patch is here [1] although its unchanged from v2. Also, If you
pick that up I will drop it from future revisions of Trusted Keys
patchset [2].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/431
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/430

-Sumit

> >
> >  drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> >  {
> >       unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> >       struct page *page;
> > +     int rc = 0;
> >
> >       page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> >       if (!page)
> > @@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> >       shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
> >       shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
> >
> > -     return 0;
> > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
> > +             shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
> > +             rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
> > +                                     (unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return rc;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> >                        struct tee_shm *shm)
> >  {
> > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
> > +             optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
> > +
> >       free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
> >       shm->kaddr = NULL;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
  2019-11-07 12:41   ` Sumit Garg
@ 2019-11-08 10:39     ` Jens Wiklander
  2019-11-08 11:05       ` Sumit Garg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Wiklander @ 2019-11-08 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sumit Garg
  Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk, tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Carriere Etienne

Hi Sumit,

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:41 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 16:36, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sumit,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:37:54PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
> > > dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
> > > during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().
> > >
> > > So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
> > > optee_shm_register().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> >
> > Looks good, I'm picking this up. Etienne told me has tested this on some
> > of his hardware so I'll add:
> > Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
> >
>
> Thanks for picking this up.
>
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
> > > to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.
>
> You also need to pick up the dependency patch too. The latest v3 of
> this patch is here [1] although its unchanged from v2. Also, If you
> pick that up I will drop it from future revisions of Trusted Keys
> patchset [2].
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/431
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/430

So I missed taking [1] into account. I think that it would make more
sense to merge this patch ("tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool
allocations") with [1] ("tee: optee: allow kernel pages to register as
shm") into a new patch.

Cheers,
Jens

>
> -Sumit
>
> > >
> > >  drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > >  {
> > >       unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> > >       struct page *page;
> > > +     int rc = 0;
> > >
> > >       page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> > >       if (!page)
> > > @@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > >       shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
> > >       shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
> > >
> > > -     return 0;
> > > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
> > > +             shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
> > > +             rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
> > > +                                     (unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     return rc;
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > >                        struct tee_shm *shm)
> > >  {
> > > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
> > > +             optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
> > > +
> > >       free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
> > >       shm->kaddr = NULL;
> > >  }
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations
  2019-11-08 10:39     ` Jens Wiklander
@ 2019-11-08 11:05       ` Sumit Garg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumit Garg @ 2019-11-08 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Wiklander
  Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk, tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Carriere Etienne

Hi Jens,

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 16:09, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:41 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 16:36, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Sumit,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:37:54PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > In case of dynamic shared memory pool, kernel memory allocated using
> > > > dmabuf_mgr pool needs to be registered with OP-TEE prior to its usage
> > > > during optee_open_session() or optee_invoke_func().
> > > >
> > > > So fix dmabuf_mgr pool allocations via an additional call to
> > > > optee_shm_register().
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 9733b072a12a ("optee: allow to work without static shared memory")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Looks good, I'm picking this up. Etienne told me has tested this on some
> > > of his hardware so I'll add:
> > > Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for picking this up.
> >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Depends on patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/30/506 that adds support
> > > > to allow registration of kernel buffers with OP-TEE.
> >
> > You also need to pick up the dependency patch too. The latest v3 of
> > this patch is here [1] although its unchanged from v2. Also, If you
> > pick that up I will drop it from future revisions of Trusted Keys
> > patchset [2].
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/431
> > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/31/430
>
> So I missed taking [1] into account. I think that it would make more
> sense to merge this patch ("tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool
> allocations") with [1] ("tee: optee: allow kernel pages to register as
> shm") into a new patch.

Sure, will send v2 as merged patch instead.

-Sumit

> Cheers,
> Jens
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > index de1d9b8..0332a53 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/shm_pool.c
> > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > >  {
> > > >       unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> > > >       struct page *page;
> > > > +     int rc = 0;
> > > >
> > > >       page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> > > >       if (!page)
> > > > @@ -26,12 +27,21 @@ static int pool_op_alloc(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > >       shm->paddr = page_to_phys(page);
> > > >       shm->size = PAGE_SIZE << order;
> > > >
> > > > -     return 0;
> > > > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF) {
> > > > +             shm->flags |= TEE_SHM_REGISTER;
> > > > +             rc = optee_shm_register(shm->ctx, shm, &page, 1 << order,
> > > > +                                     (unsigned long)shm->kaddr);
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     return rc;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static void pool_op_free(struct tee_shm_pool_mgr *poolm,
> > > >                        struct tee_shm *shm)
> > > >  {
> > > > +     if (shm->flags & TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF)
> > > > +             optee_shm_unregister(shm->ctx, shm);
> > > > +
> > > >       free_pages((unsigned long)shm->kaddr, get_order(shm->size));
> > > >       shm->kaddr = NULL;
> > > >  }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-08 11:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-31 13:07 [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations Sumit Garg
2019-11-07 11:06 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-11-07 12:41   ` Sumit Garg
2019-11-08 10:39     ` Jens Wiklander
2019-11-08 11:05       ` Sumit Garg

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.