* [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 9:52 ` Ramalingam C
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ramalingam C @ 2019-11-15 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld, Chris Wilson
FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
index 48c960ca12fb..82efc0ca83d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
+#include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
#include "intel_fbdev.h"
@@ -137,15 +138,22 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
size = mode_cmd.pitches[0] * mode_cmd.height;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
-
- /* If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is not very
- * important and we should probably use that space with FBC or other
- * features. */
obj = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
- if (size * 2 < dev_priv->stolen_usable_size)
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
- if (IS_ERR(obj))
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(dev_priv, size);
+
+ if (HAS_LMEM(dev_priv)) {
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(dev_priv, size,
+ I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is not
+ * very important and we should probably use that space with
+ * FBC or other features.
+ */
+ if (size * 2 < dev_priv->stolen_usable_size)
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
+ if (IS_ERR(obj))
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(dev_priv, size);
+ }
if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
DRM_ERROR("failed to allocate framebuffer\n");
return PTR_ERR(obj);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 9:52 ` Ramalingam C
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ramalingam C @ 2019-11-15 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld, Chris Wilson
FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
index 48c960ca12fb..82efc0ca83d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
+#include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
#include "intel_fbdev.h"
@@ -137,15 +138,22 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
size = mode_cmd.pitches[0] * mode_cmd.height;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
-
- /* If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is not very
- * important and we should probably use that space with FBC or other
- * features. */
obj = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
- if (size * 2 < dev_priv->stolen_usable_size)
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
- if (IS_ERR(obj))
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(dev_priv, size);
+
+ if (HAS_LMEM(dev_priv)) {
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(dev_priv, size,
+ I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is not
+ * very important and we should probably use that space with
+ * FBC or other features.
+ */
+ if (size * 2 < dev_priv->stolen_usable_size)
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
+ if (IS_ERR(obj))
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(dev_priv, size);
+ }
if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
DRM_ERROR("failed to allocate framebuffer\n");
return PTR_ERR(obj);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 10:28 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-11-15 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69517/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7350 -> Patchwork_15275
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15275 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_15275, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15275:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-skl-lmem: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15275 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([fdo#105541])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([fdo#111045] / [fdo#111096])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- {fi-kbl-7560u}: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([fdo#109964] / [fdo#110343]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [DMESG-WARN][9] ([fdo#112261]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset:
- fi-icl-dsi: [INCOMPLETE][11] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-icl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-icl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-icl-u2: [FAIL][13] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [WARN][15] ([fdo#112252]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
[fdo#105541]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#109964]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
[fdo#110343]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
[fdo#111045]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
[fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
[fdo#112252]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112252
[fdo#112261]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112261
Participating hosts (49 -> 44)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-kbl-soraka fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7350 -> Patchwork_15275
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7350: 152f497716543b573ad729cbee8dd0e51d6b4aaf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5287: 9e57f8a51d59b3ffe4002d761fe0315d733bd66e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15275: 7d588de1c1736c5c78da846ba80128b61aee8173 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
7d588de1c173 drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 10:28 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-11-15 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/69517/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7350 -> Patchwork_15275
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15275 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_15275, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15275:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-skl-lmem: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15275 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([fdo#105541])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-pipe-b.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([fdo#111045] / [fdo#111096])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
- {fi-kbl-7560u}: [INCOMPLETE][7] ([fdo#109964] / [fdo#110343]) -> [PASS][8]
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [DMESG-WARN][9] ([fdo#112261]) -> [PASS][10]
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset:
- fi-icl-dsi: [INCOMPLETE][11] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][12]
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-icl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-icl-dsi/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-icl-u2: [FAIL][13] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- fi-skl-6770hq: [WARN][15] ([fdo#112252]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7350/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/fi-skl-6770hq/igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
[fdo#105541]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
[fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
[fdo#109964]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109964
[fdo#110343]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110343
[fdo#111045]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
[fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
[fdo#112252]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112252
[fdo#112261]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112261
Participating hosts (49 -> 44)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-kbl-soraka fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-byt-clapper
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7350 -> Patchwork_15275
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7350: 152f497716543b573ad729cbee8dd0e51d6b4aaf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5287: 9e57f8a51d59b3ffe4002d761fe0315d733bd66e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_15275: 7d588de1c1736c5c78da846ba80128b61aee8173 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
7d588de1c173 drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15275/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 12:25 ` Matthew Auld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2019-11-15 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 09:52, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> wrote:
>
> FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Sounds reasonable I think. Do we also need to adjust intelfb_create as
part of this? pin_iomap, gmadr etc?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 12:25 ` Matthew Auld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Auld @ 2019-11-15 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 09:52, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> wrote:
>
> FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Sounds reasonable I think. Do we also need to adjust intelfb_create as
part of this? pin_iomap, gmadr etc?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 13:42 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-15 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld, Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld
Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-11-15 12:25:41)
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 09:52, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> Sounds reasonable I think. Do we also need to adjust intelfb_create as
> part of this? pin_iomap, gmadr etc?
I had a vague idea of doing an intel_fb_vma to abstract the different
map handling. What can't be solved with one more layer of indirection?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported
@ 2019-11-15 13:42 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-15 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Auld, Ramalingam C; +Cc: intel-gfx, Matthew Auld
Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-11-15 12:25:41)
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 09:52, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > FB for fbdev is allocated from LMEM if the platform supports LMEM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>
> Sounds reasonable I think. Do we also need to adjust intelfb_create as
> part of this? pin_iomap, gmadr etc?
I had a vague idea of doing an intel_fb_vma to abstract the different
map handling. What can't be solved with one more layer of indirection?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-15 13:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-15 9:52 [PATCH] drm/i915/fbdev: FB allocation from LMEM, if supported Ramalingam C
2019-11-15 9:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2019-11-15 10:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2019-11-15 10:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-15 12:25 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2019-11-15 12:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2019-11-15 13:42 ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-15 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.