All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <pza@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	"Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:37:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118093727.21899-6-peron.clem@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191118093727.21899-1-peron.clem@gmail.com>

From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>

PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.

Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
even enable bit.

This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
package as H6 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 93f4d44e9fa8..b64250b7e2be 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
  * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
+ *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
  */
 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
 
 struct sun4i_pwm_data {
 	bool has_prescaler_bypass;
+	bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
 	unsigned int npwm;
 };
 
@@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 	val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
+	/*
+	 * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
+	 * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
+	 * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
+	 */
+	if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
+	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
+		state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);
+		state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+		state->enabled = true;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
 	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
 		prescaler = 1;
@@ -149,13 +168,23 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
 			       const struct pwm_state *state,
-			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
+			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr,
+			       bool *bypass)
 {
 	u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
 	unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
 
 	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
 
+	*bypass = state->enabled &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
+
+	/* Skip calculation of other parameters if we bypass them */
+	if (*bypass && sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
 		/* First, test without any prescaler when available */
 		prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
@@ -202,10 +231,11 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 {
 	struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
 	struct pwm_state cstate;
-	u32 ctrl;
+	u32 ctrl, period, duty, val;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int delay_us;
+	unsigned int delay_us, prescaler;
 	unsigned long now;
+	bool bypass;
 
 	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
 
@@ -220,43 +250,48 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
 	ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-	if ((cstate.period != state->period) ||
-	    (cstate.duty_cycle != state->duty_cycle)) {
-		u32 period, duty, val;
-		unsigned int prescaler;
+	ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler,
+				  &bypass);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
+		spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
+		if (!cstate.enabled)
+			clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-		ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state,
-					  &duty, &period, &prescaler);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
-			spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-			if (!cstate.enabled)
-				clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
-			return ret;
+	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		if (bypass) {
+			ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
+			/* We can skip apply of other parameters */
+			goto bypass_mode;
+		} else {
+			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
 		}
+	}
 
-		if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
-			/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
-			sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
-
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
-			ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
-		}
+	if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
+		/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-		val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
-		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
-		sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
-			usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
-		sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
+		ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+	val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
+	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
+	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
+		usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
+	sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 	else
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 
 	ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+
 	if (state->enabled) {
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm);
 	} else if (!sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm]) {
@@ -264,6 +299,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+bypass_mode:
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
 	spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Thierry Reding"
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König"
	<u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <pza-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec-gGgVlfcn5nU@public.gmane.org>,
	"Clément Péron"
	<peron.clem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:37:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118093727.21899-6-peron.clem@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191118093727.21899-1-peron.clem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec-gGgVlfcn5nU@public.gmane.org>

PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.

Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
even enable bit.

This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
package as H6 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec-gGgVlfcn5nU@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 93f4d44e9fa8..b64250b7e2be 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
  * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
+ *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
  */
 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
 
 struct sun4i_pwm_data {
 	bool has_prescaler_bypass;
+	bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
 	unsigned int npwm;
 };
 
@@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 	val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
+	/*
+	 * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
+	 * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
+	 * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
+	 */
+	if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
+	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
+		state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);
+		state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+		state->enabled = true;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
 	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
 		prescaler = 1;
@@ -149,13 +168,23 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
 			       const struct pwm_state *state,
-			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
+			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr,
+			       bool *bypass)
 {
 	u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
 	unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
 
 	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
 
+	*bypass = state->enabled &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
+
+	/* Skip calculation of other parameters if we bypass them */
+	if (*bypass && sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
 		/* First, test without any prescaler when available */
 		prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
@@ -202,10 +231,11 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 {
 	struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
 	struct pwm_state cstate;
-	u32 ctrl;
+	u32 ctrl, period, duty, val;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int delay_us;
+	unsigned int delay_us, prescaler;
 	unsigned long now;
+	bool bypass;
 
 	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
 
@@ -220,43 +250,48 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
 	ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-	if ((cstate.period != state->period) ||
-	    (cstate.duty_cycle != state->duty_cycle)) {
-		u32 period, duty, val;
-		unsigned int prescaler;
+	ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler,
+				  &bypass);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
+		spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
+		if (!cstate.enabled)
+			clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-		ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state,
-					  &duty, &period, &prescaler);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
-			spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-			if (!cstate.enabled)
-				clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
-			return ret;
+	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		if (bypass) {
+			ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
+			/* We can skip apply of other parameters */
+			goto bypass_mode;
+		} else {
+			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
 		}
+	}
 
-		if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
-			/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
-			sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
-
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
-			ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
-		}
+	if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
+		/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-		val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
-		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
-		sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
-			usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
-		sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
+		ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+	val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
+	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
+	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
+		usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
+	sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 	else
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 
 	ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+
 	if (state->enabled) {
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm);
 	} else if (!sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm]) {
@@ -264,6 +299,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+bypass_mode:
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
 	spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-- 
2.20.1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20191118093727.21899-6-peron.clem%40gmail.com.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <pza@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	"Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:37:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118093727.21899-6-peron.clem@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191118093727.21899-1-peron.clem@gmail.com>

From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>

PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.

Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
even enable bit.

This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
package as H6 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 93f4d44e9fa8..b64250b7e2be 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
  * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
+ *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
  */
 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
 
 struct sun4i_pwm_data {
 	bool has_prescaler_bypass;
+	bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
 	unsigned int npwm;
 };
 
@@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 	val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
+	/*
+	 * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
+	 * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
+	 * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
+	 */
+	if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
+	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
+		state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);
+		state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+		state->enabled = true;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
 	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
 		prescaler = 1;
@@ -149,13 +168,23 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 
 static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
 			       const struct pwm_state *state,
-			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
+			       u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr,
+			       bool *bypass)
 {
 	u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
 	unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
 
 	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
 
+	*bypass = state->enabled &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
+		  (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
+
+	/* Skip calculation of other parameters if we bypass them */
+	if (*bypass && sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output)
+		return 0;
+
 	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
 		/* First, test without any prescaler when available */
 		prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
@@ -202,10 +231,11 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 {
 	struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
 	struct pwm_state cstate;
-	u32 ctrl;
+	u32 ctrl, period, duty, val;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int delay_us;
+	unsigned int delay_us, prescaler;
 	unsigned long now;
+	bool bypass;
 
 	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
 
@@ -220,43 +250,48 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
 	ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-	if ((cstate.period != state->period) ||
-	    (cstate.duty_cycle != state->duty_cycle)) {
-		u32 period, duty, val;
-		unsigned int prescaler;
+	ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler,
+				  &bypass);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
+		spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
+		if (!cstate.enabled)
+			clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-		ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state,
-					  &duty, &period, &prescaler);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
-			spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-			if (!cstate.enabled)
-				clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
-			return ret;
+	if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
+		if (bypass) {
+			ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
+			/* We can skip apply of other parameters */
+			goto bypass_mode;
+		} else {
+			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
 		}
+	}
 
-		if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
-			/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
-			sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
-
-			ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
-			ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
-		}
+	if (PWM_REG_PRESCAL(ctrl, pwm->hwpwm) != prescaler) {
+		/* Prescaler changed, the clock has to be gated */
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-		val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
-		sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
-		sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
-			usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
-		sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_PRESCAL_MASK, pwm->hwpwm);
+		ctrl |= BIT_CH(prescaler, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+	val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
+	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
+	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
+		usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
+	sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
+
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 	else
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
 
 	ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
+
 	if (state->enabled) {
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm);
 	} else if (!sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm]) {
@@ -264,6 +299,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
 
+bypass_mode:
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
 	spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-18  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-18  9:37 [PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for H6 PWM Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner: Add H6 PWM description Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for reset line Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] pwm: sun4i: Prefer "mod" clock to unnamed Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:50   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-18  9:50     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for bus clock Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:51   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-18  9:51     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-18  9:51     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-18  9:37 ` Clément Péron [this message]
2019-11-18  9:37   ` [PATCH v5 5/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] pwm: sun4i: Add support for H6 PWM Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add PWM node Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: allwinner: h6: enable Beelink GS1 PWM Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron
2019-11-18  9:37   ` Clément Péron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191118093727.21899-6-peron.clem@gmail.com \
    --to=peron.clem@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=pza@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.