From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, andrew.murray@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Simplify optional regulator handling Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:59:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191118115930.GC9761@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <347bc3ef8399577e4cef3fdbf3af34d20b4ad27e.1573908530.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 679 bytes --] On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:54:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Null checks are both cheaper and more readable than having !IS_ERR() > splattered everywhere. > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) > + if (!rockchip->vpcie3v3) > return; > > /* > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip) > if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV) > return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v); > dev_info(dev, "no vpcie12v regulator found\n"); > + rockchip->vpcie12v = NULL; According to the API NULL is a valid regulator. We don't currently actually do this but it's storing up surprises if you treat it as invalid. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, heiko@sntech.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, andrew.murray@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Simplify optional regulator handling Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:59:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191118115930.GC9761@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <347bc3ef8399577e4cef3fdbf3af34d20b4ad27e.1573908530.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 679 bytes --] On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:54:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Null checks are both cheaper and more readable than having !IS_ERR() > splattered everywhere. > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) > + if (!rockchip->vpcie3v3) > return; > > /* > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip) > if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV) > return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v); > dev_info(dev, "no vpcie12v regulator found\n"); > + rockchip->vpcie12v = NULL; According to the API NULL is a valid regulator. We don't currently actually do this but it's storing up surprises if you treat it as invalid. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 11:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-11-16 12:54 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Make some regulators non-optional Robin Murphy 2019-11-16 12:54 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-16 12:54 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-16 12:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Simplify optional regulator handling Robin Murphy 2019-11-16 12:54 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-16 12:54 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 11:59 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2019-11-18 11:59 ` Mark Brown 2019-11-18 12:20 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 12:20 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 12:20 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 12:39 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 12:39 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 12:39 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 13:10 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 13:10 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 13:10 ` Robin Murphy 2019-11-18 13:17 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 13:17 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 13:17 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 14:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-11-18 14:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-11-18 14:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2019-11-18 18:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2019-11-18 18:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2019-11-18 18:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2019-11-18 18:38 ` Mark Brown 2019-11-18 18:38 ` Mark Brown 2019-11-18 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Make some regulators non-optional Mark Brown 2019-11-18 11:57 ` Mark Brown 2019-11-18 12:28 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 12:28 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-18 12:28 ` Andrew Murray 2019-11-20 17:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2019-11-20 17:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2019-11-20 17:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2020-11-07 11:36 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 11:36 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 11:36 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 11:57 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 11:57 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 11:57 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 12:47 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-07 12:47 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-07 12:47 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-07 12:54 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 12:54 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 12:54 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 13:30 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 13:30 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-07 13:30 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-09 12:00 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-09 12:00 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-09 12:00 ` Robin Murphy 2020-11-09 12:38 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-09 12:38 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-11-09 12:38 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191118115930.GC9761@sirena.org.uk \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.