All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking
@ 2019-11-25  0:33 yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs " yadong.qi
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: yadong.qi @ 2019-11-25  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qi1.zhang, ehabkost, mst, peterx, pbonzini, yadong.qi, rth

From: "Qi, Yadong" <yadong.qi@intel.com>

The following patches are to refine/fix issues of reserved fields checking logic
of Second-Level Paging Entries of VT-d:
- split the resevred fields arrays into two ones,
- large page only effect for L2(2M) and L3(1G), so remove
  checking of L1 and L4 for large page,
- when dt is supported, TM filed should not be Reserved(0).

Changes in v3:
- large page only effect for L2(2M) and L3(1G), so remove
  checking of L1 and L4 for large page

Qi, Yadong (2):
  intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs reserved fields checking
  intel_iommu: TM field should not be in reserved bits

 hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 40 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 18 +++++++++------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 1/2] intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs reserved fields checking
  2019-11-25  0:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking yadong.qi
@ 2019-11-25  0:33 ` yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] intel_iommu: TM field should not be in reserved bits yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking Peter Xu
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: yadong.qi @ 2019-11-25  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qi1.zhang, ehabkost, mst, peterx, pbonzini, yadong.qi, rth

From: "Qi, Yadong" <yadong.qi@intel.com>

1. split the resevred fields arrays into two ones,
2. large page only effect for L2(2M) and L3(1G), so
   remove checking of L1 and L4 for large page.

Signed-off-by: Zhang, Qi <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi, Yadong <yadong.qi@intel.com>
---
 hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 37 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  5 +----
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 14e4e6ad62..feb9e55f87 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -910,19 +910,23 @@ static dma_addr_t vtd_get_iova_pgtbl_base(IntelIOMMUState *s,
 
 /*
  * Rsvd field masks for spte:
- *     Index [1] to [4] 4k pages
- *     Index [5] to [8] large pages
+ *     vtd_spte_rsvd 4k pages
+ *     vtd_spte_rsvd_large large pages
  */
-static uint64_t vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[9];
+static uint64_t vtd_spte_rsvd[5];
+static uint64_t vtd_spte_rsvd_large[5];
 
 static bool vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(uint64_t slpte, uint32_t level)
 {
-    if (slpte & VTD_SL_PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK) {
-        /* Maybe large page */
-        return slpte & vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[level + 4];
-    } else {
-        return slpte & vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[level];
+    uint64_t rsvd_mask = vtd_spte_rsvd[level];
+
+    if ((level == VTD_SL_PD_LEVEL || level == VTD_SL_PDP_LEVEL) &&
+        (slpte & VTD_SL_PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK)) {
+        /* large page */
+        rsvd_mask = vtd_spte_rsvd_large[level];
     }
+
+    return slpte & rsvd_mask;
 }
 
 /* Find the VTD address space associated with a given bus number */
@@ -3549,15 +3553,14 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
     /*
      * Rsvd field masks for spte
      */
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[0] = ~0ULL;
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[5] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[6] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[7] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_paging_entry_rsvd_field[8] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[0] = ~0ULL;
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+
+    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[2] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[3] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
 
     if (x86_iommu_ir_supported(x86_iommu)) {
         s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_IR | VTD_ECAP_MHMV;
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
index c1235a7063..1654f746bc 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
@@ -395,14 +395,11 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
         (0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 #define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
         (0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
-#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
-        (0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
+
 #define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
         (0x1ff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 #define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
         (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
-#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
-        (0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 
 /* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
 struct VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo {
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/2] intel_iommu: TM field should not be in reserved bits
  2019-11-25  0:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs " yadong.qi
@ 2019-11-25  0:33 ` yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking Peter Xu
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: yadong.qi @ 2019-11-25  0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qi1.zhang, ehabkost, mst, peterx, pbonzini, yadong.qi, rth

From: "Qi, Yadong" <yadong.qi@intel.com>

When dt is supported, TM field should not be Reserved(0).

Refer to VT-d Spec 9.8

Signed-off-by: Zhang, Qi <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi, Yadong <yadong.qi@intel.com>
---
 hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          |  9 ++++++---
 hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 13 ++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index feb9e55f87..43c94b993b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -3554,13 +3554,16 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
      * Rsvd field masks for spte
      */
     vtd_spte_rsvd[0] = ~0ULL;
-    vtd_spte_rsvd[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd[1] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits,
+                                                  x86_iommu->dt_supported);
     vtd_spte_rsvd[2] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
     vtd_spte_rsvd[3] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
     vtd_spte_rsvd[4] = VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
 
-    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[2] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
-    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[3] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[2] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits,
+                                                         x86_iommu->dt_supported);
+    vtd_spte_rsvd_large[3] = VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(s->aw_bits,
+                                                         x86_iommu->dt_supported);
 
     if (x86_iommu_ir_supported(x86_iommu)) {
         s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_IR | VTD_ECAP_MHMV;
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
index 1654f746bc..edcf9fc9bb 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
@@ -387,7 +387,9 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
 #define VTD_INV_DESC_DEVICE_IOTLB_RSVD_LO 0xffff0000ffe0fff8
 
 /* Rsvd field masks for spte */
-#define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
+#define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L1_RSVD_MASK(aw, dt_supported) \
+        dt_supported ? \
+        (0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM | VTD_SL_TM)) : \
         (0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 #define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
         (0x800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
@@ -396,9 +398,13 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
 #define VTD_SPTE_PAGE_L4_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
         (0x880ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 
-#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
+#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L2_RSVD_MASK(aw, dt_supported) \
+        dt_supported ? \
+        (0x1ff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM | VTD_SL_TM)) : \
         (0x1ff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
-#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(aw) \
+#define VTD_SPTE_LPAGE_L3_RSVD_MASK(aw, dt_supported) \
+        dt_supported ? \
+        (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM | VTD_SL_TM)) : \
         (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
 
 /* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
@@ -503,5 +509,6 @@ typedef struct VTDRootEntry VTDRootEntry;
 #define VTD_SL_W                    (1ULL << 1)
 #define VTD_SL_PT_BASE_ADDR_MASK(aw) (~(VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & VTD_HAW_MASK(aw))
 #define VTD_SL_IGN_COM              0xbff0000000000000ULL
+#define VTD_SL_TM                   (1ULL << 62)
 
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking
  2019-11-25  0:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs " yadong.qi
  2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] intel_iommu: TM field should not be in reserved bits yadong.qi
@ 2019-11-25  3:08 ` Peter Xu
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Xu @ 2019-11-25  3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yadong.qi; +Cc: qi1.zhang, ehabkost, mst, qemu-devel, pbonzini, rth

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:33:19AM +0800, yadong.qi@intel.com wrote:
> From: "Qi, Yadong" <yadong.qi@intel.com>
> 
> The following patches are to refine/fix issues of reserved fields checking logic
> of Second-Level Paging Entries of VT-d:
> - split the resevred fields arrays into two ones,
> - large page only effect for L2(2M) and L3(1G), so remove
>   checking of L1 and L4 for large page,
> - when dt is supported, TM filed should not be Reserved(0).
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - large page only effect for L2(2M) and L3(1G), so remove
>   checking of L1 and L4 for large page

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-25  3:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-25  0:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking yadong.qi
2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] intel_iommu: refine SL-PEs " yadong.qi
2019-11-25  0:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] intel_iommu: TM field should not be in reserved bits yadong.qi
2019-11-25  3:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Refine Second-Level Paging Entries reserved fields checking Peter Xu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.