From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net,
mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
paulus@samba.org, rtd2@xtra.co.nz,
"contact@a-eon.com" <contact@a-eon.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125073923.GA30168@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> >
> > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel.
>
> Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't
> actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather
> interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the
> buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers
> to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and
> how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try
> to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably
> without needing too much arch specific magic.
Presuming the problem is relevant for all CoreNet boards something like
this could work:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
index 1b4f0254868f..7c6cfeeaff52 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
@@ -347,5 +347,11 @@ extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#define isa_dma_bridge_buggy (0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+extern phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit;
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT (ppc_dma_phys_limit - 1)
+#endif
+
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_DMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
index fe0606439b5a..346b436b6d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
@@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ void __init mpc85xx_qe_par_io_init(void)
}
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
index 7ee2c6628f64..673bcbdc7c75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void __init corenet_gen_setup_arch(void)
mpc85xx_smp_init();
swiotlb_detect_4g();
-
+ ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0x0fffffffUL;
pr_info("%s board\n", ppc_md.name);
mpc85xx_qe_init();
> As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0
>
> #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
> -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL
> +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL
> #endif
>
> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt-tEXmvtCZX7AybS5Ee8rs3A@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
darren-YHtdit1eIT3easaKlIn9Lw@public.gmane.org,
rtd2-kGM0oXzJM5p02iOg2JU2CQ@public.gmane.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
linuxppc-dev
<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
mad skateman
<madskateman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Christian Zigotzky
<chzigotzky-KCoaydhb8eAb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>,
"contact-+1neenJGU+oAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<contact-+1neenJGU+oAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
nsaenzjulienne-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125073923.GA30168-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> >
> > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel.
>
> Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't
> actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather
> interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the
> buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers
> to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and
> how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try
> to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably
> without needing too much arch specific magic.
Presuming the problem is relevant for all CoreNet boards something like
this could work:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
index 1b4f0254868f..7c6cfeeaff52 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
@@ -347,5 +347,11 @@ extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#define isa_dma_bridge_buggy (0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+extern phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit;
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT (ppc_dma_phys_limit - 1)
+#endif
+
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_DMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
index fe0606439b5a..346b436b6d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
@@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ void __init mpc85xx_qe_par_io_init(void)
}
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
index 7ee2c6628f64..673bcbdc7c75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void __init corenet_gen_setup_arch(void)
mpc85xx_smp_init();
swiotlb_detect_4g();
-
+ ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0x0fffffffUL;
pr_info("%s board\n", ppc_md.name);
mpc85xx_qe_init();
> As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0
>
> #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
> -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL
> +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL
> #endif
>
> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net,
mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
paulus@samba.org, rtd2@xtra.co.nz,
"contact@a-eon.com" <contact@a-eon.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191125093200.GMv9yXnDQsJL8yHD9wgHwrd_0MNjo8IhmizlOoPOsKc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125073923.GA30168@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> >
> > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel.
>
> Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't
> actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather
> interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the
> buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers
> to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and
> how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try
> to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably
> without needing too much arch specific magic.
Presuming the problem is relevant for all CoreNet boards something like
this could work:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
index 1b4f0254868f..7c6cfeeaff52 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
@@ -347,5 +347,11 @@ extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#define isa_dma_bridge_buggy (0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+extern phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit;
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT (ppc_dma_phys_limit - 1)
+#endif
+
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_DMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
index fe0606439b5a..346b436b6d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
@@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ void __init mpc85xx_qe_par_io_init(void)
}
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
index 7ee2c6628f64..673bcbdc7c75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void __init corenet_gen_setup_arch(void)
mpc85xx_smp_init();
swiotlb_detect_4g();
-
+ ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0x0fffffffUL;
pr_info("%s board\n", ppc_md.name);
mpc85xx_qe_init();
> As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0
>
> #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
> -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL
> +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL
> #endif
>
> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net,
rtd2@xtra.co.nz, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
paulus@samba.org, mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
"contact@a-eon.com" <contact@a-eon.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125073923.GA30168@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> >
> > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel.
>
> Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't
> actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather
> interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the
> buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers
> to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and
> how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try
> to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably
> without needing too much arch specific magic.
Presuming the problem is relevant for all CoreNet boards something like
this could work:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
index 1b4f0254868f..7c6cfeeaff52 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
@@ -347,5 +347,11 @@ extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#define isa_dma_bridge_buggy (0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+extern phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit;
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT (ppc_dma_phys_limit - 1)
+#endif
+
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_DMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
index fe0606439b5a..346b436b6d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
@@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ void __init mpc85xx_qe_par_io_init(void)
}
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
index 7ee2c6628f64..673bcbdc7c75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void __init corenet_gen_setup_arch(void)
mpc85xx_smp_init();
swiotlb_detect_4g();
-
+ ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0x0fffffffUL;
pr_info("%s board\n", ppc_md.name);
mpc85xx_qe_init();
> As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0
>
> #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
> -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL
> +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL
> #endif
>
> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net,
rtd2@xtra.co.nz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
paulus@samba.org, mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
"contact@a-eon.com" <contact@a-eon.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
nsaenzjulienne@suse.de
Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:32:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125073923.GA30168@lst.de>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:39:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hello Christoph,
> >
> > Please find attached the dmesg of your Git kernel.
>
> Thanks. It looks like on your platform the swiotlb buffer isn't
> actually addressable based on the bus dma mask limit, which is rather
> interesting. swiotlb_init uses memblock_alloc_low to allocate the
> buffer, and I'll need some help from Mike and the powerpc maintainers
> to figure out how that select where to allocate the buffer from, and
> how we can move it to a lower address. My gut feeling would be to try
> to do what arm64 does and define a new ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, preferably
> without needing too much arch specific magic.
Presuming the problem is relevant for all CoreNet boards something like
this could work:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
index 1b4f0254868f..7c6cfeeaff52 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma.h
@@ -347,5 +347,11 @@ extern int isa_dma_bridge_buggy;
#define isa_dma_bridge_buggy (0)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+extern phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit;
+#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT (ppc_dma_phys_limit - 1)
+#endif
+
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_DMA_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
index fe0606439b5a..346b436b6d3f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/common.c
@@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ void __init mpc85xx_qe_par_io_init(void)
}
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORENET_GENERIC
+phys_addr_t ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0xffffffffUL;
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
index 7ee2c6628f64..673bcbdc7c75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void __init corenet_gen_setup_arch(void)
mpc85xx_smp_init();
swiotlb_detect_4g();
-
+ ppc_dma_phys_limit = 0x0fffffffUL;
pr_info("%s board\n", ppc_md.name);
mpc85xx_qe_init();
> As a quick hack can you try this patch on top of the tree from Friday?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index f491690d54c6..e3f95c362922 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline int memblock_get_region_node(const struct memblock_region *r)
> #define MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT 0
>
> #ifndef ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT
> -#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0xffffffffUL
> +#define ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT 0x0fffffffUL
> #endif
>
> phys_addr_t memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-16 7:06 Bug 205201 - Booting halts if Dawicontrol DC-2976 UW SCSI board installed, unless RAM size limited to 3500M Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-16 7:06 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 12:16 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 12:16 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 12:16 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 12:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 12:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 12:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-21 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-21 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-21 16:34 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 16:34 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 16:34 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-21 18:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 18:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-21 18:21 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-23 11:42 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-23 11:42 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-23 11:42 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-25 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-25 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-25 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2019-11-25 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-25 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-25 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-25 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-25 16:38 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 16:38 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 16:38 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:57 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:57 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:57 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 16:36 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 16:36 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-25 16:36 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:26 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:26 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 11:26 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-26 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-26 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-26 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-27 6:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-27 6:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-27 6:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-27 6:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-11-27 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-27 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-27 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-27 15:14 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-27 15:14 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-11-27 15:14 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-12-04 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-04 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-04 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-04 12:22 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-12-04 12:22 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-12-04 12:22 ` Christian Zigotzky
2019-12-04 12:22 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-10 7:10 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-10 7:10 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-10 7:10 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-15 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-15 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-29 4:49 Christian Zigotzky
2019-10-30 0:10 ` Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191125093159.GA23118@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=contact@a-eon.com \
--cc=darren@stevens-zone.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madskateman@gmail.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rtd2@xtra.co.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.